HOW IVAN THE TERRIBLE DEFENDED THE ORTHODOX FAITH: THE RELIGIOUS DISPUTE OF THE RUSSIAN TSAR WITH THE PAPAL LEGATE

Author(s):  
Galina A. Dianova
1997 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 20-31
Author(s):  
Anne Nesbet
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 125-141
Author(s):  
Charles J. Halperin
Keyword(s):  

Nine of the ten articles in this Forum critique and/or expand upon themes, conclusions, or interpretations in Charles J. Halperin’s Ivan the Terrible: Free to Reward and Free to Punish (2019), albeit in greatly varying proportion. The tenth addresses how to teach from the book. The quality of the articles speaks for itself. The range of the themes addressed speaks to the scope of Ivan’s reign. All the contributions to the Forum constitute valuable contributions to scholarship on Ivan, but to further discussion the remarks below concentrate on areas of disagreement. Much research remains to be done, but it is doubtful that historians will ever fully understand Ivan the Terrible and his reign. Ivan will always remain “a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma,” and consensus among historians will forever remain an elusive dream.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
CHARLES J. HALPERIN
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-25
Author(s):  
Gianamar Giovannetti-Singh

The Chinese rites controversy (c.1582–1742) is typically characterized as a religious quarrel between different Catholic orders over whether it was permissible for Chinese converts to observe traditional rites and use the terms tian and shangdi to refer to the Christian God. As such, it is often argued that the conflict was shaped predominantly by the divergent theological attitudes between the rites-supporting Jesuits and their anti-rites opponents towards “accommodation.” By examining the Jesuit missionary Kilian Stumpf's Acta Pekinensia—a detailed chronicle of the papal legate Charles-Thomas Maillard de Tournon's 1705–6 investigation into the controversy in Beijing—this article proposes that ostensibly religious disputes between Catholic orders consisted primarily of disagreements over ancient Chinese history. Stumpf's text shows that missionaries’ understandings of antiquity were constructed through their interpretations of ancient Chinese books and their interactions with the Kangxi Emperor. The article suggests that the historiographical characterization of the controversy as “religious” has its roots in the Vatican suppression of the rites, which served to erase the historical nature of the conflict exposed in the Acta Pekinensia.


Author(s):  
Penskoy V. V. ◽  
◽  
Polukhin O. N. ◽  
Borisov S. N. ◽  
Dmitrakov R. A. ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document