Renal Dysfunction is an Independent Risk Factor for Rebleeding After Endoscopic Hemostasis in Patients with Peptic Ulcer Bleeding

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. 622-630
Author(s):  
Hideharu Ogiyama ◽  
◽  
Shusaku Tsutsui ◽  
Yoko Murayama ◽  
Kensuke Matsushima ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 1295-1299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yen-Ling Peng ◽  
Hsin-Bang Leu ◽  
Jiing-Chyuan Luo ◽  
Chin-Chou Huang ◽  
Ming-Chih Hou ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
pp. 15-21
Author(s):  
Hieu Tam Huynh ◽  
Dang Quy Dung Ho

Background: Peptic ulcer bleeding is one of the common medical emergencies. The hemostatic efficacy of endoscopic therapeutic modalities has been reported in many studies and frequently has been found to exceed 90%. Four groups of modalities are used in the endoscopic management of bleeding peptic ulcers: thermal probe methods, injection sclerotherapy, local spray methods, and mechanical hemostatic therapy. The endoscopic hemoclip method is a safe and effective hemostatic therapy for managing bleeding peptic ulcers. Objective: To determine the success rate of hemoclip in endoscopic hemostasis. Patients and methods: Clinical intervention study on 36 patients with peptic ulcer bleeding admitted in Can Tho Central General Hospital from May 2012 to November 2014. All the patients underwent emergency endoscopy for hemostasis by hemoclip and high-dose PPI use. Results: The success rate of initial hemostasis was 97.2%, and permanent hemostasis was 91.7%. The rates of rebleeding, surgery, mortality were 11.1%, 5.6%, 2.8%, respectively. Conclusion: Endoscopic hemostasis therapy by clipping combined with high- dose PPI is an effective, relatively safe treatment for peptic ulcer bleeding. Key words: Peptic ulcer bleeding, hemoclip, endoscopic hemostasis therapy


2012 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. 283-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara El Ouali ◽  
Alan N. Barkun ◽  
Jonathan Wyse ◽  
Joseph Romagnuolo ◽  
Joseph J.Y. Sung ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document