Mechanisms affecting equilibrium climate sensitivity in the PlaSim Earth System Model with different ocean model configurations

Author(s):  
Michela Angeloni ◽  
Elisa Palazzi ◽  
Jost von Hardenberg

<p>The equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) of a state-of-the-art Earth System Model of intermediate complexity, the Planet Simulator (PlaSim), is determined under three tuned configurations, in which the model is coupled with a simple Mixed Layer (ML) or with the full 3D Large Scale Geostrophic (LSG) ocean model, at two horizontal resolutions, T21 (600 km) and T42 (300 km). Sensitivity experiments with doubled and quadrupled CO<sub>2</sub> were run, using either dynamic or prescribed sea ice. The resulting ECS using dynamic sea ice is 6.3 K for PlaSim-ML T21, 5.4 K for PlaSim-ML T42 and a much smaller 4.2 K for PlaSim-LSG T21. A systematic comparison between simulations with dynamic and prescribed sea ice helps to identify a strong contribution of sea ice to the value of the feedback parameter and of the climate sensitivity. Additionally, Antarctic sea ice is underestimated in PlaSim-LSG leading to a further reduction of ECS when the LSG ocean is used. The ECS of ML experiments is generally large compared with current estimates of equilibrium climate sensitivity in CMIP5 models and other EMICs: a relevant observation is that the choice of the ML horizontal diffusion coefficient, and therefore of the parameterized meridional heat transport and in turn the resulting equator-poles temperature gradient, plays an important role in controlling the ECS of the PlaSim-ML configurations. This observation should be possibly taken into account when evaluating ECS estimates in models with a mixed layer ocean. The configuration of PlaSim with the LSG ocean shows very different AMOC regimes, including 250-year oscillations and a complete shutdown of meridional transport, which depend on the ocean vertical diffusion profile and the CO<sub>2</sub> forcing conditions. These features can be explored in the framework of tipping points: the simplified and parameterized form of the climate system components included in PlaSim makes this model a suitable tool to study the transitions occurring in the Earth system in presence of critical points.</p>

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michela Angeloni ◽  
Elisa Palazzi ◽  
Jost von Hardenberg

Abstract. A set of experiments is performed with coupled atmosphere-ocean configurations of the Planet Simulator, an Earth-system Model of Intermediate Complexity (EMIC), in order to identify under which set of parameters the model output better agrees with observations and reanalyses of the present climate. Different model configurations are explored, in which the atmospheric module of PlaSim is coupled with two possible ocean models, either a simple mixed-layer (ML) ocean with a diffusive transport parameterization or a more complex dynamical Large-Scale Geostrophic (LSG) ocean, together with a sea-ice module. In order to achieve a more realistic representation of present-day climate, we performed a preliminary tuning of the oceanic horizontal diffusion coefficient for the ML ocean and of the vertical oceanic diffusion profile when using LSG. Model runs under present-day conditions are compared, in terms of surface air temperature, sea surface temperature, sea ice cover, precipitation, radiation fluxes, ocean circulation, with a reference climate from observations and reanalyses. Our results indicate that, in all configurations, coupled PlaSim configurations are able to reproduce the main characteristics of the climate system, with the exception of the Southern Ocean region in the PlaSim-LSG model, where surface air and sea surface temperatures are warm-biased and sea ice cover is by consequence highly underestimated. The resulting sets of tuned parameters are used to perform a series of model equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) experiments, with the aim to identify the main mechanisms contributing to differences between the different configurations and leading to elevated values of ECS. In fact, high resulting global ECS values are found, positioned in the upper range of CMIP5 and recent CMIP6 estimates. Our analysis shows that a significant contribution to ECS is given by the sea-ice feedback mechanisms and by details of the parameterization of meridional oceanic heat transport. In particular, the configurations using a diffusive heat transport in the mixed layer present an important sensitivity in terms of radiative forcing to changes in sea-ice cover, leading to an important contribution of sea-ice feedback mechanisms to ECS.


2012 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 3053-3070 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. M. Bitz ◽  
K. M. Shell ◽  
P. R. Gent ◽  
D. A. Bailey ◽  
G. Danabasoglu ◽  
...  

Equilibrium climate sensitivity of the Community Climate System Model, version 4 (CCSM4) is 3.20°C for 1° horizontal resolution in each component. This is about a half degree Celsius higher than in the previous version (CCSM3). The transient climate sensitivity of CCSM4 at 1° resolution is 1.72°C, which is about 0.2°C higher than in CCSM3. These higher climate sensitivities in CCSM4 cannot be explained by the change to a preindustrial baseline climate. This study uses the radiative kernel technique to show that, from CCSM3 to CCSM4, the global mean lapse-rate feedback declines in magnitude and the shortwave cloud feedback increases. These two warming effects are partially canceled by cooling because of slight decreases in the global mean water vapor feedback and longwave cloud feedback from CCSM3 to CCSM4. A new formulation of the mixed layer, slab-ocean model in CCSM4 attempts to reproduce the SST and sea ice climatology from an integration with a full-depth ocean, and it is integrated with a dynamic sea ice model. These new features allow an isolation of the influence of ocean dynamical changes on the climate response when comparing integrations with the slab ocean and full-depth ocean. The transient climate response of the full-depth ocean version is 0.54 of the equilibrium climate sensitivity when estimated with the new slab-ocean model version for both CCSM3 and CCSM4. The authors argue the ratio is the same in both versions because they have about the same zonal mean pattern of change in ocean surface heat flux, which broadly resembles the zonal mean pattern of net feedback strength.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 6165-6200
Author(s):  
Øyvind Seland ◽  
Mats Bentsen ◽  
Dirk Olivié ◽  
Thomas Toniazzo ◽  
Ada Gjermundsen ◽  
...  

Abstract. The second version of the coupled Norwegian Earth System Model (NorESM2) is presented and evaluated. NorESM2 is based on the second version of the Community Earth System Model (CESM2) and shares with CESM2 the computer code infrastructure and many Earth system model components. However, NorESM2 employs entirely different ocean and ocean biogeochemistry models. The atmosphere component of NorESM2 (CAM-Nor) includes a different module for aerosol physics and chemistry, including interactions with cloud and radiation; additionally, CAM-Nor includes improvements in the formulation of local dry and moist energy conservation, in local and global angular momentum conservation, and in the computations for deep convection and air–sea fluxes. The surface components of NorESM2 have minor changes in the albedo calculations and to land and sea-ice models. We present results from simulations with NorESM2 that were carried out for the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). Two versions of the model are used: one with lower (∼ 2∘) atmosphere–land resolution and one with medium (∼ 1∘) atmosphere–land resolution. The stability of the pre-industrial climate and the sensitivity of the model to abrupt and gradual quadrupling of CO2 are assessed, along with the ability of the model to simulate the historical climate under the CMIP6 forcings. Compared to observations and reanalyses, NorESM2 represents an improvement over previous versions of NorESM in most aspects. NorESM2 appears less sensitive to greenhouse gas forcing than its predecessors, with an estimated equilibrium climate sensitivity of 2.5 K in both resolutions on a 150-year time frame; however, this estimate increases with the time window and the climate sensitivity at equilibration is much higher. We also consider the model response to future scenarios as defined by selected Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) from the Scenario Model Intercomparison Project defined under CMIP6. Under the four scenarios (SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, SSP3-7.0, and SSP5-8.5), the warming in the period 2090–2099 compared to 1850–1879 reaches 1.3, 2.2, 3.0, and 3.9 K in NorESM2-LM, and 1.3, 2.1, 3.1, and 3.9 K in NorESM-MM, robustly similar in both resolutions. NorESM2-LM shows a rather satisfactory evolution of recent sea-ice area. In NorESM2-LM, an ice-free Arctic Ocean is only avoided in the SSP1-2.6 scenario.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document