Contribution of magnetite (U-Th-Sm)/He thermometer to quantify the final exhumation of high-pressure ultramafic rocks : example of the Rocher Blanc ophiolite (western Alps)

Author(s):  
Stéphane Schwartz ◽  
Cécile Gautheron ◽  
Richard A Ketcham ◽  
Fabrice Brunet ◽  
Arnaud Agranier ◽  
...  

<p>This contribution investigates the use of the (U-Th-Sm)/He dating method to unravel the exhumation history of ultramafic ophiolite rocks. Magnetite-bearing rocks are widely distributed on the Earth's surface and are associated with a large range of geological and geodynamic settings. However, little is known of the crystallization and exhumation history of in case of oceanic accretion to orogenic zones, due to a lack of datable minerals. In the past few years, the (U-Th-Sm)/He method applied on magnetite or spinel appears to be very relevant and promising. However, the applicability of this method to access the thermal history has never been quantitatively investigated, limiting the age interpretation. To highlight the applicability and to access geological information using magnetite (U-Th-Sm)/He method (MgHe), we applied it on a well-known high-pressure low-temperature alpine ophiolite (Rocher Blanc ophiolite, Western Alps) where the P-T-t exhumation history is well constrained. A study of magnetite petrology, mineralogy and geochemistry has allowed us to characterize that magnetite crystallize at T>250°C. MgHe ages that range between apatite and zircon fission track (AFT and ZFT) ages of surrounding rocks in agreement with the known thermal sensitivity of those methods. MgHe data were co-inverted with AFT and ZFT data to determine the most robust thermal history associated with the ophiolite cooling. This first MgHe age inversion is consistent with experimental He diffusion data, opening the use of MgHe as a thermochronometer. This result allows us to refine the thermal history and to precise the geodynamical context associated to the final exhumation of this alpine ophiolite.</p>

1999 ◽  
Vol 137 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 46-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Sherlock ◽  
Simon Kelley ◽  
Simon Inger ◽  
Nigel Harris ◽  
Aral Okay

Lithos ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 376-377 ◽  
pp. 105767
Author(s):  
Paul G. Starr ◽  
Kirkland S. Broadwell ◽  
Besim Dragovic ◽  
Marco Scambelluri ◽  
Anne A. Haws ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 543 ◽  
pp. 116359
Author(s):  
Stéphane Schwartz ◽  
Cécile Gautheron ◽  
Richard A. Ketcham ◽  
Fabrice Brunet ◽  
Marianna Corre ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 625 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Ring ◽  
K. Gessner ◽  
S. Thomson ◽  
V. Markwitz

Structure and exhumation history of the Hellenide-Anatolide Orogen in the Aegean Sea region and the adjacent Anatolian peninsula is controlled by along-strike variations of pre-Alpine palaeogeography. In the Hellenides, Mesozoic extension created ribbon-like continental fragments of thinned and dense lithosphere that pinch out eastwards. In the east, the relatively large Anatolide microcontinent mostly escaped Mesozoic extension and lithospheric thinning, presumably because it had a distinctly different, thicker and more depleted lithosphere. In the Aegean transect these alongstrike differences in lithosphere structure ultimately resulted in sustained highpressure metamorphism followed by progressive slab retreat since about 60 Ma. Further east, collision of the Anatolide microcontinent at about 42 Ma formed a south verging greenschist-facies thrust-and-fold belt. Pronounced slab retreat in the Aegean forced differential extension resulting in a broad sinistral wrench corridor that started to from at 24-23 Ma. Since then, extension in both regions mainly controlled denudation. This review highlights how differences in pre-orogenic architecture control lithospheric thickening and the subsequent exhumation of high-pressure rocks, and how large-scale continental extension evolves


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Lowe ◽  
Peter M. Abbott ◽  
Takehiko Suzuki ◽  
Britta J. L. Jensen

Abstract. Modern tephra studies per se began almost 100 years ago (in the late 1920s) but the first collective of tephrochronologists, with a common purpose and nascent global outlook, was not formed until 7 September, 1961, in Warsaw, Poland. On that date, the inaugural ‘Commission on Tephrochronology’ (COT) was ratified under the aegis of the International Union for Quaternary Research (INQUA). COT’s formation can be attributed largely to the leadership of Kunio Kobayashi of Japan, the commission’s president for its first 12 years. We were motivated to record COT’s heritage for posterity and also because the discipline of tephrochronology, including the study of cryptotephras, continues to grow globally at a significant rate. This is recognition of tephrochronology as both a unique correlational and age-equivalent dating method, and as a complementary method in other fields, such as volcanology, in which tephra research has been employed to develop eruption histories and hazards and to help understand volcano-climate interactions. In this article, we review the history of COT (which also functioned under other names, abbreviated as COTS, CEV, ICCT, COTAV, SCOTAV, INTAV) under the umbrella of INQUA for 53 of the last 60 years, or under IAVCEI (International Association of Volcanology and Chemistry of the Earth’s Interior) for seven of the last 60 years, including since 2019. We describe the development of the commission and its subsequent activities that include organising nine specialist tephra-field meetings in seven different countries, numerous conference sessions or workshops, and generating tephra-themed issues of journals/books or specialist internet documents or websites. The commission began to prosper after 1987 when key changes occurred, and it has blossomed further, especially in the past decade or so as an entire new cohort of specialists has emerged alongside new analytical and dating techniques to become a vibrant global group today. We name 29 elected officers involved with COT since 1961 and their roles, and 15 honorary life members. We also document the aims of the commission and conclude by evaluating its legacies and current and future work.


Tectonics ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
A. E. Blythe ◽  
D. W. Burbank ◽  
A. Carter ◽  
K. Schmidt ◽  
J. Putkonen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document