scholarly journals Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Kejadian Low Back Pain pada Pekerja Kantoran: Systematic Review

Author(s):  
Veronica Christie Guesteva ◽  
Riza Andini Anggraini ◽  
Laura Patrycia Maudi ◽  
Putri Yasmin Rahmadiani ◽  
Neva Azzahra

Abstrak Latar Belakang: Saraf tepi pinggang bagian bawah sering mengalami masalah kesehatan yang saat ini lebih dikenal sebagai Low Back Pain (LBP). Penyakit ini sangat umum terjadi dan menjadi salah satu faktor utama yang berpengaruh dalam kualitas kinerja dan kesejahteraan kerja. Penyebab Low Back Pain (LBP) yang paling sering adalah duduk terlalu lama, sikap duduk yang salah, dan aktivitas yang berlebihan. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan memahami faktor-faktor besar yang menyebabkan terjadinya Low Back Pain di tempat kerja kantoran.  Metode: Kajian ini diolah melalui proses sistematik yang tentu disesuaikan dengan tahapan Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review (PRISMA). Google Scholar digunakan karena kemudahan dalam mengakses juga banyaknya literatur yang dapat diakses secara gratis. Artikel dipilih berdasarkan publikasi yang diterbitkan dalam periode waktu dari tahun 2016 sampai dengan tahun 2021.  Hasil: Posisi duduk yang tidak ergonomis, durasi duduk cukup lama dengan posisi yang sama, lingkungan kerja, dan karakteristik individu seperti umur, jenis kelamin, dan Indeks Massa Tubuh (IMT) berhubungan dengan kejadian LBP. Sementara itu, beban kerja tidak berhubungan dengan kejadian LBP. Kesimpulan: Faktor yang mempengaruhi kejadian LBP pada pekerja kantoran yaitu karakteristik individu, posisi duduk, durasi duduk, dan faktor lingkungan kerja berhubungan dengan kejadian LBP. Sedangkan faktor yang tidak berhubungan yaitu beban kerja. Diharapkan kepada para pekerja kantoran untuk memperbaiki posisi dan durasi duduknya sebagai pencegahan terhadap LBP. Kata kunci : Low Back Pain, posisi duduk, pekerja kantoran, dan tempat kerja Abstract Background: The nerves of the lower waist often experience health problems which are currently better known as Low Back Pain (LBP), this disease is very common and became one of the main factors that affect the quality of work performance and welfare. The most common causes of Low Back Pain are sitting too long, the wrong sitting posture, and excessive activity. The purpose of this study were to identify and understand the major factors that cause LBP in the office workplace.  Methods: This study was processed through a systematic process which adapted to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review (PRISMA) stage. Google Scholar was used due to the convenience of accessing, the large amount of literature, and open access. Articles published during 2016 to 2021 were included. Result: This study found that a non-ergonomic sitting position, long sitting duration in the same position, work environment, and individual characteristics (such as age, sex, and Body Mass Index (BMI)) were associated with the incidence of LBP. Meanwhile, the workload were not related to the incidence of LBP.  Conclusion: Individual characteristics, sitting position, sitting duration, and work environment were found as related factors of LBP. It is expected for office workers to improve their sitting position and duration as a prevention against LBP. Key Words : Low Back Pain, sitting posture, office worker, and workplace

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
Stefano Gobbo ◽  
Valentina Bullo ◽  
Manuele Bergamo ◽  
Federica Duregon ◽  
Barbara Vendramin ◽  
...  

This systematic review aimed to analyze the effects of a physical exercise (PE) program on low back pain (LBP) symptoms of office workers and the modification of flexibility and range of motion (ROM), muscular strength, and quality of life (QoL). A literature research was performed on PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE, and SPORTDiscus from April to May 2018. The keyword “low back pain” was associated with “office worker” OR “VDT operators” OR “office employees” OR “workplace” AND “exercise”, OR “exercise therapy” OR “physical activity”. Inclusion criteria were a home- or work-based exercise protocol for office workers with LBP symptoms and pre- to post-intervention evaluation of LBP symptoms. Three researchers independently examined all abstracts. The modified Cochrane methodological quality criteria were used for quality assessment and 11 articles were included. Exercise protocols were performed from 6 weeks to 12 months, 1–5 day per week, lasting 10–60 min for each session. Physical Exercise in the workplace improved all the considered outcomes. The best improvement was recorded in supervised protocols and in video-supported protocols performed in the workplace. The effect may be generated with small duration sessions during the working day, with only 10–15 min of adapted exercise to be performed 3–5 days per week.


2020 ◽  
Vol 90 ◽  
pp. 104177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorena K.B. Amaral ◽  
Mateus B. Souza ◽  
Mariana G.M. Campos ◽  
Vanessa A. Mendonça ◽  
Alessandra Bastone ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 140 ◽  
pp. 111727
Author(s):  
Mingxiao Yang ◽  
Susan Q. Li ◽  
Colleen M. Smith ◽  
Yi Lily Zhang ◽  
Ting Bao ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Waleska Reyes-Ferrada ◽  
Luis Chirosa-Rios ◽  
Angela Rodriguez-Perea ◽  
Daniel Jerez-Mayorga ◽  
Ignacio Chirosa-Rios

Background: The purpose of this systematic review was to: (I) determine the quality of evidence from studies assessing trunk isokinetic strength in subjects with acute low back pain (ALBP) compared to healthy subjects and (II) establish reference values of isokinetic trunk strength in subjects with ALBP. Methodology: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statements were followed using keywords associated with trunk, strength and low back pain. Four databases were used: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and SPORTDiscus. Methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS). Results: A total of 1604 articles were retrieved, four included in this review. All were evaluated as high risk of bias (Rob). Due to the high Rob and the diversity of protocols, instruments and variables used, it was not possible to determine reference values for subjects with ALBP, we can only establish a range of flexion peak torque (PT) between 175.1 and 89.7 Nm at 60°/s and between 185 and 81.5 Nm at 120°/s, and for extension PT between 240.0 and 91.5 Nm at 60°/s and between 217.5 and 69.2 Nm at 120°/s in subjects with ALBP. Conclusions: Due to the low quality of the evidence and the diversity of protocols used when measuring trunk isokinetic strength, it is necessary to carry out new high-quality research to establish reference values of trunk strength in subjects with ALBP.


Author(s):  
Le Ge ◽  
Chuhuai Wang ◽  
Haohan Zhou ◽  
Qiuhua Yu ◽  
Xin Li

Abstract Background Research suggests that individuals with low back pain (LBP) may have poorer motor control compared to their healthy counterparts. However, the sample population of almost 90% of related articles are young and middle-aged people. There is still a lack of a systematic review about the balance performance of elderly people with low back pain. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to understand the effects of LBP on balance performance in elderly people. Methods This systematic review and meta-analysis included a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for full-text articles published before January 2020. We included the articles that 1) investigated the elderly people with LBP; 2) assessed balance performance with any quantifiable clinical assessment or measurement tool and during static or dynamic activity; 3) were original research. Two independent reviewers screened the relevant articles, and disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer. Results Thirteen case-control studies comparing balance performance parameters between LBP and healthy subjects were included. The experimental group (LBP group) was associated with significantly larger area of centre of pressure movement (P < 0.001), higher velocity of centre of pressure sway in the anteroposterior and mediolateral directions (P = 0.01 and P = 0.02, respectively), longer path length in the anteroposterior direction (P < 0.001), slower walking speed (P = 0.05), and longer timed up and go test time (P = 0.004) than the control group. Conclusion The results showed that balance performance was impaired in elderly people with LBP. We should pay more attention to the balance control of elderly people with LBP.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document