scholarly journals We should stop calling hysteroscopic tissue removal systems ‘morcellators’

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 191-192
Author(s):  
E Saridogan
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Araya Phonghanyudh ◽  
Chayamon Thana-olarn ◽  
Chayada Teanchai ◽  
Varangkanar Jirarattanasopha

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Xia Hou ◽  
Bryan K. A. Ngoi ◽  
Sek Tien Hoh ◽  
Lee Huat K. Koh ◽  
Yuan Zi Deng

Author(s):  
Matthew Rynes ◽  
Leila Ghanbari ◽  
Jay Jia Hu ◽  
Daniel Sousa Schulman ◽  
Gregory Johnson ◽  
...  

The tools and techniques available for systems neuroscientists for neural recording and stimulation during behavior have become plentiful in the last decade. The tools for implementing these techniques in vivo, however, have not advanced respectively. The use of these techniques requires the removal of sections of skull tissue without damaging the underlying tissue, which is a very delicate procedure requiring significant training. Automating a part of the tissue removal processes would potentially enable more precise procedures to be performed, and it could democratize these procedres for widespread adoption by neuroscience lab groups. Here, we describe the ‘Craniobot’, a microsurgery platform that combines automated skull surface profiling with a computer numerical controlled (CNC) milling machine to perform a variety of microsurgical procedures in mice. Surface profiling by the Craniobot has micrometer precision, and the surface profiling information can be used to perform milling operations with relatively quick, allowing high throughput. We have used the Craniobot to perform skull thinning, small to large craniotomies, as well as drilling pilot holes for anchoring cranial implants. The Craniobot is implemented using open source and customizable machining practices and can be built with of the shelf parts for under $1000.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document