Comprehensive Fitness Control in Young Soccer Players - Comparison of Laboratory and Field Testing Indicators

Author(s):  
Anna Zakharova ◽  
Kamiliia Mekhdieva ◽  
Anastasia Berdnikova
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 1168-1174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlo Castagna ◽  
Stefano D’Ottavio ◽  
Paolo Roberto Gabrielli ◽  
Susana Póvoas

Purpose: To profile sprint endurance performance of elite-level female soccer players. Methods: Twenty-five female national-team soccer players (age 25.1 [2.7] y, body mass 59.6 [3.6] kg, height 168.5 [4.1] cm) were tested for sprint endurance, performing 5 maximal sprints, interspersed with 30 seconds of active recovery (5 × 30 m) and a 30-second all-out shuttle run in a soccer pitch. The Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test level 1 (YYIR1) evaluated intermittent high-intensity endurance under the same field-testing conditions. Maximal anaerobic capacity was assessed while participants performed three 10-second all-out bouts separated by 20 seconds of passive recovery (3 × 10 s) on a nonmotorized treadmill. Results: Huge interplayer variability was observed for sprint decrements in 3 × 10 seconds (coefficient of variation = 37%) and 5 × 30 m (coefficient of variation = 62%). The 3 × 10 performance was largely associated with 5 × 30-m mean and best time and very largely with 30 seconds. A very large and nearly perfect correlation was observed between 30 seconds and 5 × 30 mMean (r = −.86) and 5 × 30 mBest (r = −.92), respectively. The YYIR1 was moderately to largely associated with 5 × 30-m variables and 30 seconds, respectively. A nearly perfect association was observed between 5 × 30 mBest and 5 × 30 mMean (r = .97). Conclusions: Elite female soccer players’ sprint endurance variables are characterized by remarkable variability. Associations between sprint endurance variables suggest physiological interdependence and a likelihood of a general ability in sustaining sprinting in this population.


2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 495-499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zackary S. Cicone ◽  
Oleg A. Sinelnikov ◽  
Michael R. Esco

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the differences between measured (MHRobt) and predicted (MHRpred) maximal heart rate (MHR) in youth athletes. Methods: In total, 30 male soccer players [14.6 (0.6) y] volunteered to participate in this study. MHRobt was determined via maximal-effort graded exercise test. Age-predicted MHR (MHRpred) was calculated for each participant using equations by Fox, Tanaka, Shargal, and Nikolaidis. Mean differences were compared using Friedman’s 2-way analysis of variance and post hoc pairwise comparisons. Agreement between MHRobt and MHRpred values was calculated using the Bland–Altman method. Results: There were no significant differences between MHRobt and MHRpred from the Fox (P = .777) and Nikolaidis (P = .037) equations. The Tanaka and Shargal equations significantly underestimated MHRobt (P < .001). All 4 equations produced 95% limits of agreement of ±15.0 beats per minute around the constant error. Conclusions: The results show that the Fox and Nikolaidis equations produced the smallest mean difference in predicting MHRobt. However, the wide limits of agreement suggests that none of the equations adequately account for individual variability in MHRobt. Practitioners should avoid applying these equations in youth athletes and utilize a lab or field testing protocol to obtain MHR.


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva M. Garcia-Quinteiro ◽  
Elena M. Andrade ◽  
Rodriguez Mauro
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
David E. Kancler ◽  
Christopher C. Curtis ◽  
Darryl S. Stimson ◽  
Johnnie Jernigan

1993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renate Haschke ◽  
M. Tennigkeit ◽  
H.-J. Lehmann ◽  
S. Rosahl ◽  
J. Kuhl

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document