Technology Identification and Risk Assessment for Anti-Tampering of Weapon Systems

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 41-50
Author(s):  
Kyungho Song ◽  
◽  
Ara Hur ◽  
Yeonseung Ryu
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Weapon Systems ◽  
Technology Identification

Artificial Agents and General Principles of Law

2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 239-266
Author(s):  
Antje von Ungern-Sternberg
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
International Law ◽  
Artificial Agents ◽  
Criminal Recidivism ◽  
Voting Behaviour ◽  
Weapon Systems ◽  
Autonomous Cars ◽  
General Principles Of Law ◽  
The Many ◽  
Automated Decision Making

Artificial agents – from autonomous cars and weapon systems to social bots, from profiling and tracking programmes to risk assessment software predicting criminal recidivism or voting behaviour – challenge general principles of national and international law. This article addresses three of these principles: responsibility, explainability, and autonomy. Responsibility requires that actors be held accountable for their actions, including damages and breaches of law. Responsibility for actions and decisions taken by artificial agents can be secured by resorting to strict or objective liability schemes, which do not require human fault and other human factors, or by relocating human fault, i.e. by holding programmers, supervisors, or standard setters accountable. ‘Explainability’ is a term used to characterise that even if artificial agents produce useful and reliable results, it must be explainable how these results are generated. Lawyers have to define those areas of law that require an explanation for artificial agents’ activities, ranging from human rights interferences to, possibly, any form of automated decision-making that affects an individual. Finally, the many uses of artificial agents also raise questions regarding several aspects of autonomy, including privacy and data protection, individuality, and freedom from manipulation. Yet, artificial agents do not only challenge existing principles of law, they can also strengthen responsibility, explainability, and autonomy.

Risk assessment in dentistry

1998 ◽  
Vol 62 (10) ◽  
pp. 756-761 ◽  
Author(s):  
CW Douglass
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment

1648: Multi-Institutional Validation of the UCSF Cancer of the Rostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) for Prediction of Recurrence Following Radical Prostatectomy

2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 531-532
Author(s):  
Matthew R. Cooperberg ◽  
Stephen J. Freedland ◽  
David J. Pasta ◽  
Eric P. Elkin ◽  
Joseph C. Presti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy

New Questions on PAD Alter Framingham Risk Assessment

2006 ◽  
Vol 39 (17) ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
BRUCE JANCIN
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Framingham Risk

Osteoporosis Guidelines Add Risk Assessment Tool

2008 ◽  
Vol 41 (10) ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
SHERRY BOSCHERT
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Risk Assessment Tool
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document