scholarly journals Wyoming Big Sagebrush and Herbaceous Cover Relationships

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 179
Author(s):  
Bok Sowell ◽  
Carl Wambolt ◽  
Jennifer Paddock ◽  
Vanessa Lane ◽  
Michael Frisina

<p class="emsd"><span lang="EN-GB">We measured 328 sites in northern, central, and southern Montana and northern Wyoming during 2003 to test the competitive relationship of herbaceous cover in the interspaces to Wyoming big sagebrush (<em>Artemisia tridentata wyomingensis)</em> cover. Long term annual precipitation at all sites was approximately 31 cm. Sagebrush and total herbaceous cover varied from 5 to 45 percent and 3.5 to 55 percent, respectively. Simple linear regression was the best fit model for predicting herbaceous cover from sagebrush cover using the highest R<sub><span>a</span></sub><sup><span>2</span></sup> values as the model selection criteria. In northern Montana, herbaceous vegetation was predicted by sagebrush cover with the following model:  Y = 37.4 – 0.61X (<a name="OLE_LINK2"></a><a name="OLE_LINK1"></a>R<sub><span>a</span></sub><sup><span>2</span></sup>  = 0.16, P &lt; 0.001, n = 87). In central Montana, the model was Y = 14.0 – 0.00X (R<sub><span>a</span></sub><sup><span>2</span></sup>  = 0.00, P = 1.0, n = 155). In southern Montana, the model was Y = 35.9 – 0.39X (R<sub><span>a</span></sub><sup><span>2</span></sup>  = 0.14, P &lt; 0.001, n = 86). When all sites were combined, the best fit model was Y = 23.7 – 0.15X (R<sub><span>a</span></sub><sup><span>2</span>  </sup>= 0.01, P &lt; 0.061, n = 328). This analysis determined that only 1 percent of the variation in herbaceous vegetation cover was associated with Wyoming big sagebrush cover. Management suggestions to reduce Wyoming big sagebrush in order to increase long-term herbaceous production for greater sage-grouse (<em>Centrocercus urophasianus</em>) would not be recommended.</span></p>

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 129
Author(s):  
Krystle A. Wengreen ◽  
Michael Frisina ◽  
Julie L. Hager ◽  
Bok F. Sowell

<p class="emsd-body"><span lang="EN-GB">Greater sage-grouse <span class="search1">(<em>Centrocercus urophasianus)</em> is</span> a high priority species for federal and state land management agencies in the Western United States. Sage-grouse<span class="search1"> are sagebrush (<em>Artemisia spp</em>.) obligates requiring sagebrush for their survival throughout the year. Sagebrush has been removed and replaced with crested wheatgrass </span>(<em>Agropyron</em><em>cristatum</em><span class="search1"> &amp; </span><em>A.</em><em>desertorum</em><span class="search1">) throughout the West. The objectives of this paper were to review the literature (100 papers), as well as consult experts, to determine which methods are most likely to eliminate crested wheatgrass and establish sagebrush. No technique eliminates crested wheatgrass in a single application but research suggests it should not comprise more than 14% cover for successful reseeding of other species. Grazing and fire have no long-term impacts on crested wheatgrass. Mechanical treatments, such as plowing, disking, and cultivating reduce and eradicate crested wheatgrass, but a flush of invasive annual grasses following mechanical disturbance can make establishment of seeded species difficult. </span><span class="search1"><span>If invasive plant establishment is a problem with mechanical treatments, crested wheatgrass stands should be treated with </span>glyphosate in early spring for two consecutive years at a rate of 1.1 kg/ha of active ingredient. Then, sagebrush should be seeded in the late fall using a compact row seeder or Brillion cultipacker at a rate of 0.22 kg/ha pure live seed. </span></span></p>


2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 206
Author(s):  
Vanessa Lane ◽  
Jenny Sika ◽  
Carl Wambolt ◽  
Michael R. Frisina ◽  
Bok Sowell

Vegetative characteristics of 146 greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) nest sites and 48 brood rearing sites were compared with paired random sites to determine if hens were selecting sites with certain vegetative attributes at three study areas in central Montana in 2003 and 2004. Ninety-seven percent of all nest locations and 92% of all brood rearing locations were in Wyoming big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata Nutt. ssp. wyomingensis Beetle & Young) plants. Therefore, only attributes of Wyoming big sagebrush plants were analyzed. Shrub characteristics such as percent cover, density (shrubs/m2), average shrub height (cm), nest shrub height (cm) and nest shrub production (g/shrub) were recorded. Herbaceous measurements such as forb cover (%), grass cover (%), total cover (%) and grass height (cm) were recorded. Sage-grouse hen nest sites had greater (P ≤ 0.05) average shrub height (36 vs 31 cm) and more (P ≤ 0.05) nest shrub production (55 vs 48 g/shrub) than random sites. There were no differences in sagebrush cover density or nest shrub height or any herbaceous characteristics between nest and random sites. Fifty percent of all nests were successful. Successful nest sites were not different from unsuccessful nest sites in any shrub or herbaceous component. There were no differences in shrub or herbaceous measurements between yearling and adult nest sites. Shrub and herbaceous characteristics of brood sites did not differ from random sites. Average shrub height was greater (P ≤ 0.05) for adult brood rearing sites compared to yearling sites (35 vs 31 cm). Brood site shrub cover was less (P < 0.05) than nest shrub cover (14 vs 21%). Our results suggest that even though nesting sage-grouse hens selected for taller and more productive Wyoming big sagebrush plants, these attributes did not improve nesting success. Grazing guidelines suggested to increase herbaceous vegetation may not improve nesting or brood rearing success. Although brood rearing vegetative characteristics were lower (P £ 0.05) in sagebrush cover and production than nesting sites, managers should not reduce Wyoming big sagebrush cover or production to emphasize one stage of sage-grouse production since this plant is vital for all life phases. 


2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 126
Author(s):  
Jennifer Woodward ◽  
Jenny Sika ◽  
Carl Wambolt ◽  
Jay Newell ◽  
Sean Schroff ◽  
...  

<p class="emsd"><span lang="EN-GB">Greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) habitat characteristics were studied in central Montana primarily on Wyoming big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata Nutt. ssp. wyomingensis Beetle &amp; Young) dominated rangeland. The primary objective was to compare shrub and herbaceous parameters within (use, random or non-use) and between seasonal habitats (nest, brood, winter). Two study sites (Musselshell and Golden Valley counties), and 2 years (2004 and 2005) were compared. Nest, brood, and random sites were compared for herbaceous cover, and grass height (n = 648). Nest, brood, random, winter use and winter non-use sites were evaluated for shrub cover, density, and height. All differences were considered significant at P ≤ 0.05. Sage-grouse nested in areas with greater total shrub cover and height, and taller live and residual grass than was randomly available. No differences were found between brood and paired random sites for any of the herbaceous or shrub parameters measured. Shrub cover and density were greater at winter use sites than non-use sites. Winter use sites had less shrub cover than nest sites. The nest and brood habitat had similar shrub cover, density, and height on the study area. Sage-grouse habitats should be managed to include sagebrush, forbs, and grass. Herbaceous vegetation was more important during nesting and brood rearing than during the winter. Therefore, some portions of <span>sage-</span>grouse habitat may benefit from management for greater herbaceous cover, but not at the expense of removing sagebrush. Sagebrush cover from 10 to 15 percent was the most consistent component of sage-grouse habitat.</span></p>


Ecosystems ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 257-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Schyler A. Reis ◽  
Lisa M. Ellsworth ◽  
J. Boone Kauffman ◽  
David W. Wrobleski

1996 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myles J. Watts ◽  
Carl L. Wambolt

2014 ◽  
Vol 92 (4) ◽  
pp. 319-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.B. Dinkins ◽  
M.R. Conover ◽  
C.P. Kirol ◽  
J.L. Beck ◽  
S.N. Frey

Survival of breeding-age hens has been identified as the demographic rate with the greatest potential to influence population growth of Greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus (Bonaparte, 1827); hereafter “Sage-Grouse”). During 2008–2011, we collected summer survival data from 427 Sage-Grouse hens in southern Wyoming, USA. We assessed the effects of raptor densities, anthropogenic features, landscape features, and Sage-Grouse hen behavior on Sage-Grouse hen survival. Survival of Sage-Grouse hens was positively associated with the proportion of big sagebrush (genus Artemisia L.) habitat within 0.27 km radius and road density and negatively associated with power-line density, proximity to forested habitat, and topographic ruggedness index within 0.27 km radius (TRI0.27). Raptor densities did not have individual effects on Sage-Grouse survival; however, an interaction between site-specific exposure to Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos (L., 1758)) density (GOEA) and TRI0.27 indicated that negative effects of GOEA and TRI0.27 were dampened in areas with both high TRI0.27 and high GOEA. Survival of nonreproductive hens was greater than brooding or nesting hens. Hens that stayed in intermediate-size flocks and yearling hens had higher survival than hens in small or large flocks and hens >2 years old. Results indicated that risk of death for Sage-Grouse hens was greater relative to potential raptor perches but not anthropogenic and landscape variables that could provide food subsidies for predators.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document