Sudden Visual Loss after Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Device Implantation

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. e28-e31
Author(s):  
Luigi A. De Vitis ◽  
Alessandro Marchese ◽  
Chiara Giuffrè ◽  
Adriano Carnevali ◽  
Lea Querques ◽  
...  

Purpose To report a case of sudden decrease in visual acuity possibly due to a cardiogenic embolism in a patient who underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implantation. Methods A 62-year-old man with severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction and a left bundle branch block was referred to our department because of a sudden decrease in visual acuity. Nine days earlier, he had undergone cardiac transapical implantation of a CRT device, which was followed, 2 days later, by an inflammatory reaction. The patient underwent several general and ophthalmologic examinations, including multimodal imaging. Results At presentation, right eye (RE) best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was counting fingers and RE pupil was hyporeactive. Fundus examination revealed white-centered hemorrhagic dots suggestive of Roth spots. Fluorescein angiography showed delay in vascular perfusion during early stage, late hyperfluorescence of the macula and optic disk, and peripheral perivascular leakage. The first visual field test showed complete loss of vision RE and a normal left eye. Due to suspected giant cell arteritis, temporal artery biopsy was performed. Thirty minutes after the procedure, an ischemic stroke with right hemisyndrome and aphasia occurred. The RE BCVA worsened to hands motion. Four months later, RE BCVA did not improve, despite improvement in fluorescein angiography inflammatory sign. Conclusions We report a possible cardiogenic embolism secondary to undiagnosed infective endocarditis causing monocular visual loss after CRT device implantation. It remains unclear how the embolus caused severe functional damage without altering the retinal anatomical structure.

Heart Rhythm ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. S267
Author(s):  
Mohammed Ali Ghossein ◽  
Antonius M.W. van Stipdonk ◽  
Floor CWM. Salden ◽  
Elien B. Engels ◽  
Francesco Zanon ◽  
...  

Medicina ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 110
Author(s):  
Teruhiko Imamura

Optimal patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy is crucial. There are several concerns that allow to better clarify the association between the ischemic etiology of heart failure and the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. The type of ischemic coronary disease has an impact on the responses to cardiac resynchronization therapy. The prognostic impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy on cardiac death including heart transplantation and durable ventricular assist device implantation is another concern.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 845-852 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stian Ross ◽  
Eirik Nestaas ◽  
Erik Kongsgaard ◽  
Hans H Odland ◽  
Trine F Haland ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims  Three distinct septal contraction patterns typical for left bundle branch block may be assessed using echocardiography in heart failure patients scheduled for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The aim of this study was to explore the association between these septal contraction patterns and the acute haemodynamic and electrical response to biventricular pacing (BIVP) in patients undergoing CRT implantation. Methods and results  Thirty-eight CRT candidates underwent speckle tracking echocardiography prior to device implantation. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether their septal contraction pattern was indicative of dyssynchrony (premature septal contraction followed by various amount of stretch) or not (normally timed septal contraction with minimal stretch). CRT implantation was performed under invasive left ventricular (LV) pressure monitoring and we defined acute CRT response as ≥10% increase in LV dP/dtmax. End-diastolic pressure (EDP) and QRS width served as a diastolic and electrical parameter, respectively. LV dP/dtmax improved under BIVP (737 ± 177 mmHg/s vs. 838 ± 199 mmHg/s, P < 0.001) and 26 patients (68%) were defined as acute CRT responders. Patients with premature septal contraction (n = 27) experienced acute improvement in systolic (ΔdP/dtmax: 18.3 ± 8.9%, P < 0.001), diastolic (ΔEDP: −30.6 ± 29.9%, P < 0.001) and electrical (ΔQRS width: −23.3 ± 13.2%, P < 0.001) parameters. No improvement under BIVP was observed in patients (n = 11) with normally timed septal contraction (ΔdP/dtmax: 4.0 ± 7.8%, P = 0.12; ΔEDP: −8.8 ± 38.4%, P = 0.47 and ΔQRS width: −0.9 ± 11.4%, P = 0.79). Conclusion  Septal contraction patterns are an excellent predictor of acute CRT response. Only patients with premature septal contraction experienced acute systolic, diastolic, and electrical improvement under BIVP.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document