A collaborative study on user participation in mental health services : east meets west

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pui-shan, Jessica Tang
2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samson Tse ◽  
Eric Cheung ◽  
Alice Kan ◽  
Roger Ng ◽  
Sania Yau

2016 ◽  
Vol 62 (8) ◽  
pp. 696-707 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Pui-Shan Tang ◽  
Samson Tse ◽  
Larry Davidson

Background: User participation is advocated on the basis that consumers know their own needs better than anyone else. Photovoice is a participatory research method that empowers the grass-root population to give voice on concerned issues for eliciting social change. Aim: This study explores the experience and impact of user participation in mental health services (MHS) in Hong Kong through photovoice. It also examines the effects of this method in studying user participation. Method: In this qualitative inquiry, authors, two peer researchers and three participants were involved in the various stages of research design, data collection and data analysis. Participants took photos showing their perception and experiences of being involved in different MHS systems. They shared their narratives through these images and reflected on the participatory experience of photovoice. Results: User participation was experienced as a gradual process of assuming control that involved personal responsibility, connection with peers, collaboration with staff, redefinition of boundaries and social inclusion. Meaningful participation gave rise to a sense of contribution, interpersonal connection and self-worth and transformed one’s identity. Participants enjoyed the mutual interaction and derived benefit from the photovoice process. Issues such as consent and confidentiality arose in implementation. Conclusion: Participation entails partnership among service users, providers and peers. Photovoice opens up new space for unfolding expert knowledge. Further application of this participatory approach with the local community is suggested in order to develop person-centered care.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tine Nesbø Tørseth ◽  
Marian Ådnanes

Abstract Background: In January 2019, the official launch of new guidelines within specialist mental health services and substance abuse treatment in Norway took place, with treatment organized according to structured patient pathways. The pathway system introduced maximum lengths for assessment, treatment, and evaluation and the coding of the different steps. The system was based on overall goals to improve services by focusing on user participation, coordinated patient flow, avoidance of unnecessary waiting time, more equal services independent of geographic location, and greater emphasis on somatic health and lifestyle. The purpose of our study was to examine the implementation of patient pathways within mental health services, and more specifically how trust emerges and influences the final outcome. Methods: Our study included four outpatient clinics for adults in four community health centres in different parts of Norway. The informants consisted of treatment personnel, leaders, and pathway coordinators, and data were collected through qualitative group and individual interviews. Results: The results indicated four distinct themes or reactions towards the patient pathway system. These themes were unclarity regarding the overall goals and content of the patient pathway; increased coding, registration and administrative work, which professionals experienced as stressors; an IT and journal system that did not correspond with the coding of the patient pathway; and an unrealistic distinction between assessment and treatment. All of the above encouraged health professionals to reduce the importance of patient pathways, as well as increase their resistance towards health authorities. Conclusions: To understand how and why health professionals made sense of the patient pathway, theory on trust can be used to show how professionals within health care interpret the implementation of patient pathways as a desire to control more areas and work practices within mental health care, leading to their distrust towards the new system Trial registration: Not neccessary


Crisis ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-5
Author(s):  
Mary Frances Seeley

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document