The Influence of CO2 on the Solubility of Quartz in Single-Phase Hydrothermal Fluids: Implications for the Formation of Stockwork Veins in Porphyry Copper Deposits

2019 ◽  
Vol 114 (6) ◽  
pp. 1195-1206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Monecke ◽  
Jochen Monecke ◽  
T. James Reynolds

Abstract Porphyry copper deposits consist of low-grade stockwork and disseminated sulfide zones that contain characteristic vein generations formed during the evolution of the hydrothermal systems. The present contribution examines the influence of variable CO2 concentrations on the solubility of quartz in single-phase hydrothermal fluids forming stockwork veins in porphyry deposits at temperatures of 150° to 550°C and pressures ranging from 100 to 2,000 bar at concentrations up to 8 mol % CO2. The calculations demonstrate that quartz solubility in hydrothermal fluids decreases with increasing CO2 content. Retrograde quartz solubility is less pronounced in CO2-bearing fluids and is not observed in single-phase fluids having CO2 concentrations exceeding 6 mol %. Despite the effects of CO2, retrograde quartz solubility plays an important role in the formation of porphyry stockwork veins that contain little or no quartz as a gangue mineral. At high temperatures and lithostatic pressure conditions below 900 bar, early biotite veins can form as a result of quasi-isobaric cooling of single-phase hydrothermal fluids under conditions of retrograde quartz solubility or near-constant quartz solubility. Stock-work veins consisting of molybdenite or hypogene copper sulfide minerals lacking quartz could form at temperatures of up to 450°C under hydrostatic pressures ranging from ~250 to 900 bar. In the presence of CO2, retrograde quartz solubility is shifted toward slightly lower temperatures at constant pressure. At temperatures below ≾375°C, quartz is precipitated during quasi-isobaric cooling irrespective of CO2 content of the hydrothermal fluids, resulting in the formation of late porphyry quartz veins.

Geophysics ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 65 (5) ◽  
pp. 1418-1434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Baishali Roy ◽  
Ron M. Clowes

The Guichon Creek batholith (GCB), located in south‐central British Columbia, contains several large, low‐grade copper deposits of considerable economic importance. The surface geology of the Guichon batholith and its surrounding region have been well mapped; however, little information about subsurface features is available. The batholith consists of four major phases, emplaced radially outward, which can be separated on the basis of their texture and composition. Previous interpretation of gravity data suggests a mushroom‐shaped structure for the batholith. Data from Lithoprobe seismic reflection line 88-11, acquired across the batholith in 1988, reveal weakly coherent east‐dipping reflections on the west side and west‐dipping reflections on the east in the upper 10 km. To determine if these are related to structures associated with the batholith, we reprocessed the upper 6 s with particular emphasis on applications of signal enhancement techniques (e.g., pattern recognition methods, refraction statics, dip moveout corrections) and correlation of the improved subsurface images with the geological environment associated with porphyry copper deposits. Low near‐surface velocities correlate well with the phases of the batholith hosting the major copper deposits, which structurally lie in faulted and brecciated regions. Although the top 1.5 km cannot be imaged by the regional‐scale seismic reflection data, the reprocessed seismic section helps define the edges of the batholith, its various concentric phases, and the stem in the depth range of 1.5 to 10 km. The seismic results are complemented by 2.5-D (profile sense) modeling and 3-D inversion of regional‐scale gravity and high‐resolution aeromagnetic data. These show a low‐density and low‐magnetic‐susceptibility region associated with the batholith that extends to more than 10 km depth. The region of active mining interest lies above a circular low‐susceptibility area at 2 km depth and a low‐velocity region. Integrated interpretation of geophysical results and geological observations indicates the GCB is a funnel‐shaped feature in which mineralization is located above the stem of the batholith.


SEG Discovery ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Stewart D. Redwood

Abstract The porphyry deposit name has a long and fascinating etymological history of over 3,000 years. “Porphyry” is derived from the ancient Greek word porphyra (πoρϕύρα), or purple. It was originally applied to a rare purple dye, Tyrian purple, extracted by the Phoenicians from murex shells. It was later applied to a prized purple porphyritic rock, Imperial Porphyry or Porfido rosso attico, quarried by the Romans from Mons Porphyrites in the Eastern Red Sea hills of Egypt from the first to fifth centuries A.D., and used as a monumental stone in Imperial Rome and Byzantium (Istanbul). The name evolved in the field of igneous petrology to include all rocks with a porphyritic texture, regardless of their color. Mining of the first porphyry copper deposits, which were originally called disseminated or low-grade copper deposits, started in 1905. As a result of the close spatial and genetic relationship to porphyry stocks, they became known as porphyry copper deposits. The term was first used by W. H. Emmons in his 1918 textbook The Principles of Economic Geology, but it was originally used more as an engineering and economic description, as in Parsons’ 1933 book The Porphyry Coppers. It was slow to catch on in the geological literature. It was first used in the title of a paper in Economic Geology in 1947 but did not gain widespread use until the 1970s, following the publication of seminal papers on porphyry models and genesis by Lowell and Guilbert (1970) and Sillitoe (1972, 1973).


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimo Chiaradia ◽  
Luca Caricchi

Abstract Porphyry copper deposits, the principal natural source of Cu and Mo, form at convergent margins. Copper is precipitated from fluids associated with cooling magmas that have formed in the mantle and evolved at variably deep crustal levels, before raising close to the surface where they exsolve fluids and copper. Despite significant advances in the understanding of their formation, there are still underexplored aspects of the genesis of porphyry copper deposits. Here, we address the role played by magma injection rates into the shallow crust on the formation of porphyry copper deposits with different copper endowments. Using a mass balance approach, we show that supergiant porphyry Cu deposits (>10 Mt Cu) require magma volumes and magma injection rates typical of large volcanic eruptions. Because such volcanic events would destroy magmatic-hydrothermal systems or prevent their formation, the largest porphyry Cu deposits can be considered as failed large eruptions and this may be one of the causes of their rarity.


2018 ◽  
Vol 113 (5) ◽  
pp. 1007-1046 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Monecke ◽  
Jochen Monecke ◽  
T. James Reynolds ◽  
Subaru Tsuruoka ◽  
Mitchell M. Bennett ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document