scholarly journals Magnetic resonance imaging analysis of screw in-type lateral anchor pull-out in large to massive rotator cuff repair in patients older than 60 years

Author(s):  
Sang-Yoon Lee ◽  
Young-Min Noh

Background: This study was performed to identify the incidence of screw in-type lateral anchor pull-out in patients older than 60 years who underwent rotator cuff repair for large to massive rotator cuff tears.Methods: This study reviewed 25 patients older than 60 years who were diagnosed with large to massive rotator cuff tear and underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in our hospital from March 2017 to February 2021. Preoperative tear size (anterior to posterior, medial to lateral) was measured via preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and the re-tear rate was evaluated at 3 months via MRI. All 25 patients underwent MRI scanning on postoperative day 1 and at 3 months after surgery. The change of lateral row anchor position was measured in axial views on MRI images. The change of anchor position was measured postoperative day 1 and 3 months after surgery by MRI and statistically compared according to bone mineral density (BMD), sex, and number of lateral anchors. Results: Two consecutive MRIs (postoperative day 1 and 3 months) in 25 patients were compared. Anchor pull-out occurred in six patients during 3 months (6.7%), and the mean pull-out length difference was 1.56 mm (range, 0.16–2.58). There was no significant difference in the number of pull-out anchors, degree of pull-out difference, or the re-tear rate by comparing BMD (A, BMD≤-2.5; B, BMD>-2.5), sex, or number of anchors used in each surgery (C, two anchors; D, three anchors) (p>0.05). Conclusions: Pull-out of screw in-type lateral anchors was observed in very few patients (6.7%), and the mean pull-out length difference was negligibly small (1.56 mm) in our study. The screw in-type lateral anchor seems to be a decent option without concern of anchor pull-out even in elderly patients (>60 yr).

1997 ◽  
Vol 344 ◽  
pp. 275???283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herv?? Thomazeau ◽  
Eric Boukobza ◽  
Nicolas Morcet ◽  
Jacques Chaperon ◽  
Frantz Langlais

2011 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 306-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaideep J. Iyengar ◽  
Sharoun Porat ◽  
Keith R. Burnett ◽  
Luis Marrero-Perez ◽  
Victor H. Hernandez ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 170-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Co ◽  
Sonny Bhalla ◽  
Kevin Rowan ◽  
Sven Aippersbach ◽  
Simon Bicknell

Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether 3-dimensional (3D) volumetric acquisition of shoulder ultrasound (US) data for supraspinatus rotator cuff tears is as sensitive when compared with conventional 2-dimensional (2D) US and routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and whether there is improved workroom time efficiency when using the 3D technique compared with the 2D technique. Methods In this prospective study, 39 shoulders underwent US and MRI examination of their rotator cuff to confirm the accuracy of both the 2D and 3D techniques. The difference in sensitivities was compared by using confidence interval analysis. The mean times required to obtain the 2D and 3D US data and to review the scans were compared by using a 1-tailed Wilcoxon test. Results Sensitivity and specificity of 2D US in detecting supraspinatus full- and partial-thickness tears was 100% and 96%, and 80% and 100%, respectively, and similar values were obtained with 3D US at 100% and 100%, and 90% and 96.6%, respectively. Analysis of the confidence limits of the sensitivities showed no significant difference. The mean time (± SD) of the overall 2D examination of the shoulder, including interpretation was 10.02 ± 3.28 minutes, whereas, for the 3D examination, it was 7.08 ± 0.35 minutes. Comparison between the 2 cohorts when using a 1-tailed Wilcoxon test showed a statistically significant difference ( P < .05). Conclusion 3D US of the shoulder is as accurate as 2D US when compared with MRI for the diagnosis of full- and partial-thickness supraspinatus rotator cuff tears, and 3D US examination significantly reduced the time between the initial scan and the radiologist interpretation, ultimately improving workplace efficiency.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document