Class Disparities, Market Fundamentalism, and Work–Family Policy

Author(s):  
Ruth Milkman

This chapter examines class disparities in existing access to work–family support in the context of market fundamentalism. It begins with a discussion of class disparities in time use and access to employer-provided benefits that facilitate work–family reconciliation, along with an overview of market fundamentalism and business objections to work–family policy. It then analyzes California's 2002 law that created a paid family leave program covering all private-sector employees in the state. It shows that advocates for paid leave built a broad coalition in support of the law and prevailed despite organized business' strong opposition to the measure. However, the longstanding class disparities in access to paid family leave were only partially alleviated. The chapter also highlights the importance of class differences among women in relation to paid family leave.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Bennett ◽  
Isil Erel ◽  
Léa Stern ◽  
Zexi Wang

2018 ◽  
Vol 108 ◽  
pp. 388-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Bana ◽  
Kelly Bedard ◽  
Maya Rossin-Slater

We use novel administrative data to study trends and disparities in usage of California's first-in-the-nation paid family leave (PFL) program. We show that take-up for both bonding with a new child and caring for an ill family member increased over 2005-2014. Most women combine PFL with maternity leave from the State Disability Insurance system, resulting in leaves longer than 6 weeks. Most men take less than the full 6 weeks of PFL. Individuals in the lowest earnings quartile and in small firms are the least likely to take leave. There are important differences in take-up across industries, especially for men.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Bennett ◽  
Isil Erel ◽  
Lea Henny Stern ◽  
Zexi Wang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document