"Task Interdependence, Work Group Composition and Turnover: A Longitudinal Study"

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 (1) ◽  
pp. 12921
Author(s):  
Christine D. Isakson ◽  
Jesper B Sorensen
2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 523-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-Li Wu ◽  
Yi-Chih Lee

Purpose – Although the work group is the main context for knowledge exchange and combination in today’s organizations, few knowledge-sharing studies have been conducted at the group level. The purpose of this paper is to apply the concept of group social capital to determine how to promote knowledge sharing at the group level. The authors divided group social capital into two segments, conduits and resources, and argue that different group social capital conduits (i.e. work design in this study) lead to varied resources, which subsequently influence group knowledge sharing. Design/methodology/approach – In this study, group social capital conduits included social interaction and task interdependence, and group social capital resources included group trust and a supportive climate for knowledge sharing. The authors conducted a survey on work groups in the high-tech industry using a sample of 86 work groups. Findings – The results indicated that social interaction in a work group was positively related to group trust and that task interdependence was positively related to group trust and a supportive climate for knowledge sharing. Furthermore, group trust and a supportive climate for knowledge sharing were both found to have an influence on knowledge sharing. Originality/value – Applying the concept of group social capital, this paper is the first research to discuss how group social capital conduits and resources influence knowledge sharing. The results of this study lead us to a better understand the relationship between group social capital and knowledge sharing.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Eileen DeTroy ◽  
Edwin J. C. van Leeuwen ◽  
Cody Ross ◽  
Katherine A. Cronin ◽  
Daniel Haun

iScience ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 102175
Author(s):  
Sarah E. DeTroy ◽  
Cody T. Ross ◽  
Katherine A. Cronin ◽  
Edwin J.C. van Leeuwen ◽  
Daniel B.M. Haun

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 485-505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jürgen P. Wagner ◽  
Nigel Grigg ◽  
Robin Mann ◽  
Musli Mohammad

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate how the basic problem of ingroup favoritism in a setting of high task interdependence is addressed through an intervention strategy combining different approaches. Design/methodology/approach This paper reports on evidence from extensive field-based case research. It focuses on the holistic description of a single high-performance logistics setting and discusses the distinct but interrelated managerial approaches against the backdrop of behavioral theory. Findings Most notably, the authors examine how culturally specific factors such as people’s social ingroup-outgroup categorization is reduced through a continual rotation of jobs. Work relationships are purposefully depersonalized and consequently socially reframed through reference to the corporate philosophy. Likewise, behaviors, roles and responsibilities are redefined based on a purposeful reinterpretation of the corporate philosophy. The authors evaluate these desired behaviors against the background of the perceptions of work group members and describe how these guide actual behaviors. Practical implications The insights of this study exemplify how adverse behavioral effects that may occur in some socio-cultural contexts may be avoided through the appropriate design of operations. Originality/value This study employs a holistic approach to provide valuable insights into both practitioners and academics in the field of OM to counteract detrimental behavioral effects in real-world operations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document