scholarly journals Optimization of Network Carbon Capture and Storage System (CCS) Using Mathematical Approach

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 161
Author(s):  
David Licindo ◽  
Arinne Christin Paramudita ◽  
Renanto Handogo ◽  
Juwari Purwo Sutikno
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Capture ◽  
Storage System ◽  
Carbon Capture And Storage ◽  
Exact Result ◽  
Maximum Load ◽  
Mathematical Approach ◽  
Source To Sink ◽  
Storage Location ◽  
The Cost ◽  
And Storage

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is one of the technologies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) tocapture of CO2 from the flue gas of a power plant that typically use coal as a Source of energy and then store it ina suitable geological storage (in specific locations). In practice, these sites may not be readily available forstorage at the same time that the Sources (GHG producing) are operating which gives rise to multi – periodplanning problems. This study presents a mathematical approach by considering constraints limit flowratereceived by Sink, various time availability of Sink and Source and calculation with the purpose to determine theminimum cost network which is getting the maximum load that is exchanged from Source to Sink. Illustrativecase studies are given to demonstrate the application of mathematical models to obtained with the exact result ofthe exchange network from Source to Sink. Derived from network obtained from the calculation of theMaximum Load Source to Sink and results may vary in accordance with the limitations that exist in themathematical model. The case study has been prepared with 2 cases, first 6 Source and 3 Sink with value ofSource Load is greater than the amount available on the Sink. Also, second case is 2 Source and 5 Sinkwithvalue of Source Load is smaller than the amount available on the Sink. In addition, Case Studies tominimize the cost of pipeline construction and distribution of CO2 by plant and storage location determination inJava. Flowrate restriction factor that goes into Sink, Source and Sink establishment time and cost are taken intoaccount can affect the networks that can be exchanged from the Source to the Sink.

Novel methodology for EEDI calculation considering onboard carbon capture and storage system

2021 ◽  
Vol 105 ◽  
pp. 103241
Author(s):  
Sanghyuk Lee ◽  
Seunghyeon Yoo ◽  
Hyunjun Park ◽  
Junkeon Ahn ◽  
Daejun Chang
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Capture ◽  
Storage System ◽  
Carbon Capture And Storage ◽  
And Storage

The Cost of Carbon Capture and Storage in the Perth Region

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Guy Allinson ◽  
Richard Edward Dunsmore ◽  
Peter Neal ◽  
Minh Ho
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Capture ◽  
Carbon Capture And Storage ◽  
The Cost ◽  
And Storage

scholarly journals Total cost of carbon capture and storage implemented at a regional scale: northeastern and midwestern United States

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 20190065 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J. Schmelz ◽  
Gal Hochman ◽  
Kenneth G. Miller
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Carbon Capture ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Regional Scale ◽  
Carbon Capture And Storage ◽  
Midwestern United States ◽  
Additional Costs ◽  
The Cost ◽  
And Storage

We model the costs of carbon capture and storage (CCS) in subsurface geological formations for emissions from 138 northeastern and midwestern electricity-generating power plants. The analysis suggests coal-sourced CO 2 emissions can be stored in this region at a cost of $52–$60 ton −1 , whereas the cost to store emission from natural-gas-fired plants ranges from approximately $80 to $90. Storing emissions offshore increases the lowest total costs of CCS to over $60 per ton of CO 2 for coal. Because there apparently is sufficient onshore storage in the northeastern and midwestern United States, offshore storage is not necessary or economical unless there are additional costs or suitability issues associated with the onshore reservoirs. For example, if formation pressures are prohibitive in a large-scale deployment of onshore CCS, or if there is opposition to onshore storage, offshore storage space could probably store emissions at an additional cost of less than $10 ton −1 . Finally, it is likely that more than 8 Gt of total CO 2 emissions from this region can be stored for less $60 ton −1 , slightly more than the $50 ton −1 Section 45Q tax credits incentivizing CCS.

scholarly journals Assessing Potential Thermo-Mechanical Impacts on Caprock Due to CO2 Injection—A Case Study from Northern Lights CCS

Energies ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (16) ◽  
pp. 5054
Author(s):  
Nicholas Thompson ◽  
Jamie Stuart Andrews ◽  
Tore Ingvald Bjørnarå
Keyword(s):  
Effective Stress ◽  
Carbon Capture ◽  
Storage System ◽  
Carbon Capture And Storage ◽  
Development Planning ◽  
Co2 Injection ◽  
Field Development ◽  
Stress Changes ◽  
Pressure Changes ◽  
And Storage

Due to significant temperature differences between the injected medium and in situ formation, injection of CO2 (as with water or other cold fluids) at depth induces thermal changes that must be accounted for a complete understanding of the mechanical integrity of the injection/storage system. Based on evaluations for the Northern Lights Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) project, we focus on thermal effects induced on the caprock via conduction from cooling in the storage sands below. We investigate, using both analytical and numerical approaches, how undrained effects within the low permeability caprock can lead to volumetric contraction differences between the rock framework and the pore fluid which induce both stress and pore pressure changes that must be properly quantified. We show that such undrained effects, while inducing a more complicated response in the stress changes in the caprock, do not necessarily lead to unfavourable tensile conditions, and may, in fact, lead to increases in effective stress. These observations build confidence in the integrity of the caprock/seal system. We also show, through conservative assumptions, that pressure communication between the caprock and storage sands may lead to a localised negative effective stress condition, challenging stability of the base caprock, which will be mitigated for in field development planning.

scholarly journals Techno-Economic Assessment of Bio-Energy with Carbon Capture and Storage Systems in a Typical Sugarcane Mill in Brazil

Energies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 1129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Restrepo-Valencia ◽  
Arnaldo Walter
Keyword(s):  
Co2 Capture ◽  
Carbon Capture ◽  
Carbon Capture And Storage ◽  
Economic Assessment ◽  
Energy Requirements ◽  
Biomass Combustion ◽  
Reference Case ◽  
Cogeneration System ◽  
The Cost ◽  
And Storage

For significantly reducing greenhouse gas emissions, those from electricity generation should be negative by the end of the century. In this sense, bio-energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) technology in sugarcane mills could be crucial. This paper presents a technical and economic assessment of BECCS systems in a typical Brazilian sugarcane mill, considering the adoption of advanced—although commercial—steam cogeneration systems. The technical results are based on computational simulations, considering CO2 capture both from fermentation (released during ethanol production) and due to biomass combustion. The post combustion capture technology based on amine was considered integrated to the mill and to the cogeneration system. A range of energy requirements and costs were taken from the literature, and different milling capacities and capturing rates were considered. Results show that CO2 capture from both flows is technically feasible. Capturing CO2 from fermentation is the alternative that should be prioritized as energy requirements for capturing from combustion are meaningful, with high impacts on surplus electricity. In the reference case, the cost of avoided CO2 emissions was estimated at 62 €/t CO2, and this can be reduced to 59 €/t CO2 in case of more efficient technologies, or even to 48 €/t CO2 in case of larger plants.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document