scholarly journals Endovascular treatment of upper extremity ischemia due to radiation-induced arteritis

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 506-508
Author(s):  
Fatih Yilmaz ◽  
◽  
Berhan Keskin ◽  
Zubeyde Bayram ◽  
Serdar Fidan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Radiation Induced ◽  
Extremity Ischemia

Successful Revascularization for Delayed Presentation of Radiation-Induced Distal Upper Extremity Ischemia

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 257.e5-257.e8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee J. Goldstein ◽  
Joseph D. Ayers ◽  
Scott Hollenbeck ◽  
Jason A. Spector ◽  
Ageliki G. Vouyouka
Keyword(s):  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Delayed Presentation ◽  
Radiation Induced ◽  
Extremity Ischemia

scholarly journals Case Report: Urgent endovascular treatment of subclavian artery injury after blunt trauma

F1000Research ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taka-aki Nakada ◽  
Koji Idoguchi ◽  
Hiroshi Fukuma ◽  
Hidefumi Ono ◽  
Shota Nakao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Cerebral Infarction ◽  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Blunt Trauma ◽  
Subclavian Artery ◽  
Clavicle Fracture ◽  
Arterial Injury ◽  
Artery Injury ◽  
Extremity Ischemia

Subclavian arterial injury is rare and potentially life-threatening, particularly when it leads to arterial occlusion, causing limb ischemia, retrograde thromboembolization and cerebral infarction within hours after injury. Here we report a blunt trauma case with subclavian arterial injury, upper extremity ischemia, and the need for urgent treatment to salvage the limb and prevent cerebral infarction. A 41-year-old man had a left, open, mid-shaft clavicle fracture and left subclavian artery injury accompanied by a weak pulse in the left radial artery, decreased blood pressure of the left arm compared to the right, and left hand numbness. Urgent debridement and irrigation of the open clavicle fracture was followed by angiography for the subclavian artery injury. The left distal subclavian artery had a segmental dissection with a thrombus. Urgent endovascular treatment using a self-expanding nitinol stent successfully restored the blood flow and blood pressure to the left upper extremity. Endovascular treatment is a viable option for cases of subclavian artery injury where there is a risk of extremity ischemia and cerebral infarction.

scholarly journals Thoracoscopic Cervicothoracic Sympathectomy for Treatment of Upper Extremity Ischemia

2008 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 1218-1218
Author(s):  
Majid Moini ◽  
Mohammad R. Rasouli
Keyword(s):  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Extremity Ischemia

scholarly journals Acute right upper extremity ischemia resulting from true aneurysmof right brachial artery: A case report

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 337-340
Author(s):  
Niki Tadayon ◽  
Sina Zarrintan ◽  
Seyed Mohammad Reza Kalantar-Motamedi
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Ct Angiography ◽  
Brachial Artery ◽  
Artery Aneurysm ◽  
True Aneurysm ◽  
Postoperative Course ◽  
Run Off ◽  
The Right ◽  
Extremity Ischemia

We report a case of 66-year-old woman with true aneurysm of the right brachial artery. She presented with acute upper extremity ischemia. The hand was cold and parenthesized and distal pulses were absent. CT angiography (CTA) revealed a 20*25 mm true brachial artery aneurysm. The aneurysm was thrombosed without distal run-off. We excised the aneurysm and reestablished the arterial flow by a reverse saphenous interposition graft. The postoperative course was uneventful.

Bilateral upper extremity ischemia after administration of dihydroergotamine-heparin for prophylaxis of deep venous thrombosis

1988 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 410-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth B. Seifert ◽  
William M. Blackshear ◽  
C.Wayne Cruse ◽  
John A. Schwartz ◽  
Frank Suslavitch
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Extremity Ischemia

scholarly journals Endovascular Treatment of Radiation-induced Carotid Blowout Syndrome: Report of Two Cases

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 597-603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akihiko Adachi ◽  
Eiichi Kobayashi ◽  
Yoshiyuki Watanabe ◽  
Tomoko Yoneyama-Sarnecky ◽  
Michihiro Hayasaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Carotid Blowout Syndrome ◽  
Radiation Induced ◽  
Syndrome Report

scholarly journals Cerebrovascular Complications After Upper Extremity Access for Complex Aortic Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 186-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Max M. Meertens ◽  
Charlotte C. Lemmens ◽  
Gustavo S. Oderich ◽  
Geert W. H. Schurink ◽  
Barend M. E. Mees
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Cerebrovascular Event ◽  
Cerebrovascular Complications ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Aortic Interventions

Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study was to review the risk of developing cerebrovascular complications from upper extremity access during endovascular treatment of complex aortic aneurysms. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the PRISMA guideline. An electronic search of the public domains Medline (PubMed), Embase (Ovid), Web of Science and Cochrane Library was performed to identify studies related to the treatment of aortic aneurysms involving upper extremity access. Meta-analysis was used to compare the rate of cerebrovascular event after left, right and bilateral upper extremity access. Results are presented as relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Thirteen studies including 1276 patients with complex endovascular treatment of aortic aneurysms using upper extremity access were included in the systematic review. Left upper extremity access (UEA) was used in 1028 procedures, right access in 148 and bilateral access in 100 procedures. The rate of cerebrovascular complications for patients treated through left UEA was 1.7%, through right UEA 4% and through bilateral UEA 5%. In the meta-analysis, we included seven studies involving 645 patients treated with a left upper extremity access, 87 patients through a right and 100 patients through a bilateral upper extremity access. Patients, who underwent right-sided (RR 5.01, 95% CI 1.51–16.58, P = 0.008) or bilateral UEA (RR 4.57, 95% CI 1.23–17.04, P = 0.02), had a significantly increased risk of cerebrovascular events compared to those who had a left-sided approach. Conclusion Left upper extremity access is associated with a significantly lower rate of cerebrovascular complications as compared to right or bilateral upper extremity access.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document