scholarly journals Comparison of interradicular distances and cortical bone thickness in Thai patients with Class I and Class II skeletal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography

2016 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nattida Khumsarn ◽  
Virush Patanaporn ◽  
Apirum Janhom ◽  
Dhirawat Jotikasthira
2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 325-331
Author(s):  
Kalyani Trivedi ◽  
Bharvi K Jani ◽  
Sagar Hirani ◽  
Mansi V Radia

Aim: The purpose of this study was to use measurements from cone beam computed tomography scans to quantify the cortical bone thickness of mandibular buccal shelf region and preferable site for buccal shelf implant placement in 10 hyperdivergent and 10 hypodivergent patients. Method: 20 cone beam computed tomographies were equally divided based on divergence. 6 sites were examined: mesial of first molar (6M), middle of first molar (6Mi), interdental between the first and second molar (Id), mesial of second molar (7M), middle of second molar (7Mi), and distal of second molar (7D). The study quantified the mandibular buccal shelf relative to its angle of slope, the cortical bone thickness measured perpendicular to the bone surface, the amount of cortical bone 30° angle to the bone surface. The cortical bone thickness was measured perpendicular and at a 30° angle at 3, 5, and 7 mm from the alveolar crest. Result: Significant change is seen at the buccal shelf slope at 6M ( P = .001) and further increase in this angle till 7D ( P = .003). Mean amount of cortical bone for hyperdivergent group at 7D is 4.77 ± 0.68 mm and for hypodivergent group is 3.86 ± 0.70 mm. Statistically significant differences were noted at insertion site at 90° and 30° for both groups at 3, 5, and 7 mm from the alveolar crest. Conclusion: Preferable site for buccal shelf implant placement is distal to the mandibular second molar. The maximum amount of cortical bone is found distal to the second molar 7 mm vertically from alveolar crest when the buccal shelf implant is placed at 30° angulation for hyperdivergent group.


2017 ◽  
Vol 123 (6) ◽  
pp. 707-713 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monikelly do Carmo Chagas Nascimento ◽  
Solange Maria de Almeida Boscolo ◽  
Francisco Haiter-Neto ◽  
Emanuela Carla dos Santos ◽  
Ivo Lambrichts ◽  
...  

Odontology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 108 (4) ◽  
pp. 669-675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonino Lo Giudice ◽  
Lorenzo Rustico ◽  
Alberto Caprioglio ◽  
Marco Migliorati ◽  
Riccardo Nucera

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. 5812-5817 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ozkan Adiguzel ◽  
Ceren Aktuna Belgin ◽  
Seda Falakaloglu ◽  
Suzan Cangul ◽  
Zeki Akkus

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 630-637 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Y Hajeer ◽  
Maram MN Al-Masri ◽  
Mowaffak A Ajaj ◽  
Muataz S Al-Eed

ABSTRACT Objectives To evaluate the bone thickness and density in the lower incisors’ region in orthodontically untreated adults, and to examine any possible relationship between thickness and density in different skeletal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and methods The CBCT records of 48 patients were obtained from the archive of orthodontic department comprising three groups of malocclusion (class I, II and III) with 16 patients in each group. Using OnDemand 3D® software, sagittal sections were made for each lower incisor. Thicknesses and densities were measured at three levels of the root (cervical, middle and apical regions) from the labial and lingual sides. Accuracy and reliability tests were undertaken to assess the intraobserver reliability and to detect systematic error. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was employed to detect significant differences among the three groups of skeletal malocclusion. Results Apical buccal thickness (ABT) in the four incisors was higher in class II and I patients than in class III patients (p < 0.05). There were significant differences between buccal and lingual surfaces at the apical and middle regions only in class II and III patients. Statistical differences were found between class I and II patients for the cervical buccal density (CBD) and between class II and III patients for apical buccal density (ABD). Relationship between bone thickness and density values ranged from strong at the cervical regions to weak at the apical regions. Conclusions Sagittal skeletal patterns affect apical bone thickness and density at buccal surfaces of the four lower incisors’ roots. Alveolar bone thickness and density increased from the cervical to the apical regions. How to cite this article Al-Masri MMN, Ajaj MA, Hajeer MY, Al-Eed MS. Evaluation of Bone Thickness and Density in the Lower Incisors’ Region in Adults with Different Types of Skeletal Malocclusion using Cone-beam Computed Tomography. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015;16(8):630-637.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document