Effectiveness of point‐of‐care testing for therapeutic control of chronic conditions: results from the PoCT in General Practice Trial

2009 ◽  
Vol 190 (11) ◽  
pp. 624-626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanya K Bubner ◽  
Caroline O Laurence ◽  
Angela Gialamas ◽  
Lisa N Yelland ◽  
Philip Ryan ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosy Tirimacco ◽  
Briony Glastonbury ◽  
Caroline O. Laurence ◽  
Tanya K. Bubner ◽  
Mark D. Shephard ◽  
...  

Objectives. To describe the development and evaluation of an accreditation program for Point of Care Testing (PoCT) in general practice, which was part of the PoCT in general practice (GP) Trial conducted in 2005–07 and funded by the Australian Government. Setting and participants. Thirty general practices based in urban, rural and remote locations across South Australia, New South Wales and Victoria, which were in the intervention arm of the PoCT Trial were part of the accreditation program. A PoCT accreditation working party was established to develop an appropriate accreditation program for PoCT in GP. A multidisciplinary accreditation team was formed consisting of a medical scientist, a general practitioner or practice manager, and a trial team representative. Methodology and sequence of events. To enable practices to prepare for accreditation a checklist was developed describing details of the accreditation visit. A guide for surveyors was also developed to assist with accreditation visits. Descriptive analysis of the results of the accreditation process was undertaken. Outcomes. Evaluation of the accreditation model found that both the surveyors and practice staff found the process straightforward and clear. All practices (i.e. 100%) achieved second-round accreditation. Discussion and lessons learned. The accreditation process highlighted the importance of ongoing education and support for practices performing PoCT. What is known about the topic? Currently there is no rebate for Point of Care testing in Australia. Before the Australian Government can consider a rebate it has to be shown that PoCT is safe for patient care. Implementation of a quality framework and an accreditation model for PoCT is vital to ensure that clinical care is not compromised by use of this technology. What does this paper add? This paper provides a model for PoCT accreditation that meets requirements of both the GP and scientific community. It reports on the first government-funded PoCT in general practice trial and illustrates what needs to be considered if the Government decides to fund PoCT in general practice. What are the implications for practitioners? Description of a PoCT accreditation process highlights to practitioners what is entailed in following the interim standards for PoCT currently available. This study is an important piece of work as it shows that PoCT in general practice can be performed safely within a quality framework that meets scientific accreditation requirements.


Author(s):  
Mark Shephard ◽  
Anne Shephard ◽  
Les Watkinson ◽  
Beryl Mazzachi ◽  
Paul Worley

Background From 2005 to 2007 the Australian Government funded a multicentre, clustered randomized controlled trial to determine the clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, satisfaction and safety of point of care testing (PoCT) in general practice (GP). PoC tests measured (and devices used) in the trial were haemoglobin A1c and urine albumin:creatinine ratio (DCA 2000), lipids (Cholestech LDX) and international normalized ratio (CoaguChek S). Methods An internal quality control (QC) program was developed as part of a quality management framework for the trial. PoCT device operators were provided with a colour-coded QC Result Sheet and QC Action Sheet for on-site recording and interpreting of their results. Within-practice imprecision for QC testing was calculated and compared with the analytical goals for imprecision set prior to the trial. Results The average participation rate for QC testing was 91% or greater. Median within-practice imprecision met the analytical goals for all PoC tests, except for high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) where observed performance was outside the minimum goal for one level and one lot number of QC. Most practices achieved the imprecision goals for all analytes, with the principal exception of HDL-C. Conclusions Results from QC testing indicate that PoCT in the GP trial met the analytical goals set for the trial, with the exception of HDL-C.


Pathology ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
pp. 18-19
Author(s):  
Justin Beilby ◽  
Caroline Laurence ◽  
Angela Gialamas ◽  
Lisa Yelland ◽  
Tanya Bubner ◽  
...  

Pathology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa N. Yelland ◽  
Angela Gialamas ◽  
Caroline O. Laurence ◽  
Kristyn J. Willson ◽  
Philip Ryan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document