general practice setting
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

150
(FIVE YEARS 23)

H-INDEX

21
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (9) ◽  
pp. 656-660
Author(s):  
Fred Chuang ◽  
Rohan Arasu ◽  
Benjamin Wallwork

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (7) ◽  
pp. 467-471
Author(s):  
Ellen O'Connor ◽  
Aoife McVey ◽  
Stephanie Demkiw ◽  
Nathan Lawrentschuk ◽  
Declan G Murphy

2021 ◽  
pp. 75-92
Author(s):  
Philippa Tostevin

This chapter contains 33 questions that encompass all of the important areas of ear, nose, and throat (ENT), with detailed explanations. The questions are based on the important knowledge that needs to be accrued as an undergraduate or a recently qualified doctor, as many readers may not have the opportunity to work as a junior doctor in an ENT team before treating ENT patients in the Emergency Department or in a general practice setting. Unique to this series, questions are rated by difficulty and are cross-referenced to the eleventh edition of Oxford Handbook of Clinical Specialties to track revision progress and revise effectively.


Author(s):  
Pernille Ravn Jakobsen ◽  
Jeanette Reffstrup Christensen ◽  
Jesper Bo Nielsen ◽  
Jens Søndergaard ◽  
Dorte Ejg Jarbøl ◽  
...  

Most type 2 diabetes patients are treated in general practice and there is a need of developing and implementing efficient lifestyle interventions. eHealth interventions have shown to be effective in promoting a healthy lifestyle. The purpose of this study was to test the feasibility, including the identification of factors of importance, when offering digital lifestyle coaching to type 2 diabetes patients in general practice. We conducted a qualitative feasibility study with focus group interviews in four general practices. We identified two overall themes and four subthemes: (1) the distribution of roles and lifestyle interventions in general practice (subthemes: external and internal distribution of roles) and (2) the pros and cons for digital lifestyle interventions in general practice (subthemes: access to real life data and change in daily routines). We conclude that for digital lifestyle coaching to be feasible in a general practice setting, it was of great importance that the general practitioners and practice nurses knew the role and content of the intervention. In general, there was a positive attitude in the general practice setting towards referring type 2 diabetes patients to digital lifestyle intervention if it was easy to refer the patients and if easily understandable and accessible feedback was implemented into the electronic health record. It was important that the digital lifestyle intervention was flexible and offered healthcare providers in general practice an opportunity to follow the type 2 diabetes patient closely.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document