Abstract
Following the era of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the occurrence of revascularization in chronic total occlusions (CTO) is correlated with positive and longstanding echocardiographic and clinical outcomes. The beneficial outcomes of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) treatment to manage CTO are currently inconclusive, since patients presenting with CTO were frequently ruled out from a vast number of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) which assess BVS. This systematic review is aimed to review and recapitulate available reports on the clinical outcomes of CTO with BVS treatment. Available data in the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and, clinicaltrials.gov are being examined to gather investigations on BVS-treated CTO. Outcomes of concern involved vessel restenosis, scaffold thrombosis, target lesion revascularization, myocardial infarction, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and all-cause mortality. Thirteen papers have met the criteria for inclusion. All papers were written based on observational studies cumulative population samples of 1,077. Two papers were found to involve retrospective comparison of drug-eluting stents (DES) group with BVS group. The investigations had varying group size and duration of follow-up. This review presented beneficial results for BVS-treated CTO. In double-arm studies, the recorded MACE incidence diverged from 0% to 6.7% with no notable differences between DES and BVS populations. While reports on the implantation of the first-generation BVS in CTO populations are infrequent and recruited only insufficient observational studies samples, the available data is promising. The data shows satisfactory results which are analogous to second-generation DES. However, additional investigation by means of RCTs and the application of more novel scaffolds is necessitated.
Procedural and one-year clinical outcomes of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for the treatment of chronic total occlusions: a single-centre experience
