scholarly journals Cholecystitis following resection of esophageal cancer. 4 Cases required surgical intervention.

1989 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 2697-2700
Author(s):  
Takashi IWAZAWA ◽  
Toshimasa TSUJINAKA ◽  
Yoshihiro KIDO ◽  
Michio OGAWA ◽  
Hitoshi SHIOZAKI ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6561-6561
Author(s):  
Juan Ricardo ◽  
Jorge Conte ◽  
Talal Alkayali ◽  
Ahmed Salem ◽  
Jamie Huston ◽  
...  

6561 Background: Hispanics are the fastest-growing minority accounting for 18% of the US population. The National Cancer Institute estimated 17,290 new cases of esophageal cancer (EC) in the US in 2018. Hispanics are reported to have lower EC prevalence. We sought to interrogate the demographic patterns of EC in Hispanics. Secondary objective was to examine evidence of socioeconomic disparities and differential therapy. Methods: We queried the National Cancer Database to identify patients with EC between 2005–2015. Patients were divided into two groups, Hispanic vs Non-Hispanic (NH). Demographics compared were age, sex, tumor data, surgical intervention, type of treatment, insurance status, income, residence area, and Charlson/Deyo score. Pearson’s Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables. Groups were matched by propensity score-matched analysis (PSM). Survival analysis was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and associated log-rank test. P-value ≤0.05 was considered significant. Results: We identified 85,004 patients with EC; 3,205 were Hispanic (3.8%). In this US population we identified significant disparities between the Hispanic and NH groups. Statistically significant differences among Hispanics included higher prevalence of squamous EC (24.7% vs 19.6%), higher likelihood of stage IV cancer diagnosis (40.7% vs. 34.8%), younger age, higher uninsured status (10.4% vs 3%) with income < $38,000 (26.4% vs 15.9%), and Charlson/Deyo score 0 (72.3% vs 70.7%) when compared to NH. However, Hispanics were less likely to have surgical intervention (29% vs 36.3) and overall less likely to receive any type of treatment (30.1% vs 26.1%). PSM showed that any treatment, insurance status and lower income were predictors of survival. Treated Hispanics survived longer than NH (median survival 17 vs 15 months). Overall survival at 5 years was 22% vs 17%, respectively, p < 0.05. Conclusions: Despite lower prevalence of EC in Hispanics compared to NH, there is a disproportionately higher number of metastatic and untreated cases among Hispanics. This disparity may be explained by Hispanics' limited access to medical care exacerbated by their socioeconomic and insurance status. Further clinical and epidemiologic research is warranted to reveal other factors impacting these health disparities.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Heshmatollah Salahi ◽  
Mehdi Tahamtan ◽  
Bijan Ziaian ◽  
Mansoor Masjedi ◽  
Zahra Saadati ◽  
...  

Gastrotracheal fistula following open transhiatal esophagectomy (Orringer’s technique) for esophageal cancer is an unusual but lethal complication. Surgical intervention with resection of the fistula tract and primary interrupted suturing of gastric and tracheal orifices using a muscle flap interposition has proved to be a successful method. We report the case of a 73-year-old male with an adenocarcinoma of the distal part of the esophagus, who underwent open transhiatal esophagectomy (Orringer’s technique) with gastric tube reconstruction and cervical anastomosis. The patient did not receive induction chemoradiotherapy before the esophagectomy. Two attempts of surgical repair of fistula failed and the patient died. Being aware of warning signs such as dyspnea and respiratory distress accompanied by bilious content in the tracheal tube is helpful in the early detection and treatment of this type of fistula.


2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (13) ◽  
pp. 169-176
Author(s):  
Lisa M. Evangelista ◽  
James L. Coyle

Esophageal cancer is the sixth leading cause of death from cancer worldwide. Esophageal resection is the mainstay treatment for cancers of the esophagus. While curative, surgical resection may result in swallowing difficulties that require intervention from speech-language pathologists (SLPs). Minimally invasive surgical procedures for esophageal resection have aimed to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with more invasive techniques. Both intra-operative and post-operative complications, regardless of the surgical approach, can result in dysphagia. This article will review the epidemiological impact of esophageal cancers, operative complications resulting in dysphagia, and clinical assessment and management of dysphagia pertinent to esophageal resection.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document