scholarly journals Determination of Operative Procedure Based on Preoperative Examination of Rectal Cancer.

1992 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 1161-1165
Author(s):  
Hiroharu Isomoto ◽  
Kazuo Shirouzu ◽  
Tatsuhisa Morodomi ◽  
Yuichi Yamashita ◽  
Teruo Kakegawa
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lotte Jacobs ◽  
David B Meek ◽  
Joost van Heukelom ◽  
Thomas L Bollen ◽  
Peter D Siersema ◽  
...  

Background and aim Endoscopy and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are used routinely in the diagnostic and preoperative work-up of rectal cancer. We aimed to compare colonoscopy and MRI in determining rectal tumor height. Methods Between 2002 and 2012, all patients with rectal cancer with available MRIs and endoscopy reports were included. All MRIs were reassessed for tumor height by two abdominal radiologists. To obtain insight in techniques used for endoscopic determination of tumor height, a survey among regional endoscopists was conducted. Results A total of 211 patients with rectal cancer were included. Tumor height was significantly lower when assessed by MRI than by endoscopy with a mean difference of 2.5 cm (95% CI: 2.1–2.8). Although the agreement between tumor height as measured by MRI and endoscopy was good (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.7 (95% CI: 0.7–0.8)), the 95% limits of agreement varied from –3.0 cm to 8.0 cm. In 45 patients (21.3%), tumors were regarded as low by MRI and middle–high by endoscopy. MRI inter- and intraobserver agreements were excellent with an ICC of 0.8 (95% CI: 0.7–0.9) and 0.9 (95% CI: 0.9–1.0), respectively. The survey showed no consensus among endoscopists as to how to technically measure tumor height. Conclusion This study showed large variability in rectal tumor height as measured by colonoscopy and MRI. Since MRI measurements showed excellent inter- and intraobserver agreement, we suggest using tumor height measurement by MRI for diagnostic purposes and treatment allocation.


1980 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-62
Author(s):  
Akira OHASHI ◽  
Kiyoshi NISHIYAMA ◽  
Yoshihiro OMI ◽  
Hitoshi KANEKO ◽  
Shunsuke KOBAYASHI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Vol 60 (6) ◽  
pp. 593-595 ◽  
Author(s):  
I Eid ◽  
M S El-Muhtaseb ◽  
R Mukherjee ◽  
R Renwick ◽  
D S Gardiner ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 99 (2) ◽  
pp. 100-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koji Komori ◽  
Kenya Kimura ◽  
Takashi Kinoshita ◽  
Tsuyoshi Sano ◽  
Seiji Ito ◽  
...  

Abstract Preoperative management of advanced rectal cancer often includes chemoradiotherapy, but little is known about the late complications of radiotherapy. However, these are usually serious, making determination of the characteristics of late complications after radiation therapy critical. Accordingly, we investigated the complications occurring after adjuvant pelvic radiation therapy in patients with advanced rectal cancer. We enrolled 34 consecutive patients with TNM stage III rectal cancer who had undergone curative surgery with adjuvant pelvic radiation therapy. Data on the type of complication/organ involved, the number of complications, the phase of onset, and the treatments used were reviewed. Patients who experienced gut complications or edema were less likely to have their complications resolved than those with complications due to infection. Similarly, patients with multiple complications and late-onset complications were also less likely to have their complications resolved than those with single complications and those with early-onset complications, respectively. Adjuvant radiation therapy in patients with resected advanced rectal cancer was associated with various complications, characterized by late onset and impaired resolution. Therefore, patients indicated for radiation therapy should be selected with great caution.


2011 ◽  
Vol 201 (4) ◽  
pp. 508-513 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Hirano ◽  
Keiji Koda ◽  
Chihiro Kosugi ◽  
Masato Yamazaki ◽  
Hideki Yasuda

2011 ◽  
Vol 32 (11) ◽  
pp. 1023-1031 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Knupp ◽  
Sjoerd A.S. Stufkens ◽  
Lilianna Bolliger ◽  
Alexej Barg ◽  
Beat Hintermann

Background: Supramalleolar osteotomies are increasingly popular for addressing asymmetric arthritis of the ankle joint. Still, recommendations for the indication and the use of additional procedures remain arbitrary. We preoperatively grouped different types of asymmetric arthritis into several classes and assessed the usefulness of an algorithm based on these classifications for determining the choice of supramalleolar operative procedure and the risk factors for treatment failure. Methods: Ninety-two patients (94 ankles) were followed prospectively and assessed clinically and radiographically 43 months after a supramalleolar osteotomy for asymmetric arthritis of the ankle joint. Results: Significant improvement of the clinical scores was found. Postoperative reduction of radiological signs of arthritis was observed in mid-stage arthritis. Age and gender did not affect the outcome. Ten ankles failed to respond to the treatment and were converted to total ankle replacements or fused. Conclusions: Supramalleolar osteotomies can be effective for the treatment of early and midstage asymmetric arthritis of the ankle joint. However, certain subgroups have a tendency towards a worse outcome and may require additional surgery. Therefore preoperative distinction of different subgroups is helpful for determination of additional procedures. Level of Evidence: II, Prospective Comparative Study


2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 606-615
Author(s):  
Xiaoyan Zhang ◽  
◽  
Qiaoyuan Lu ◽  
Xiangjie Guo ◽  
Wuteng Cao ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document