The Impossibility of the Separation Thesis: A Response to Joakim Sandberg

2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 541-548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jared D. Harris ◽  
R. Edward Freeman

Distinguishing “business” concerns from “ethical” values is not only an unfruitful and meaningless task, it is also an impossible endeavor. Nevertheless, fruitless attempts to separate facts from values produce detrimental second-order effects, both for theory and practice, and should therefore be abandoned. We highlight examples of exemplary research that integrate economic and moral considerations, and point the way to a business ethics discipline that breaks new ground by putting ideas and narratives about business together with ideas and narratives about ethics.

2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-87
Author(s):  
Mark T. Keane ◽  
Aaron Gerow

AbstractThe textual, big-data literature misses Bentley et al.’s message on distributions; it largely examines the first-order effects of how a single, signature distribution can predict population behaviour, neglecting second-order effects involving distributional shifts, either between signature distributions or within a given signature distribution. Indeed, Bentley et al. themselves under-emphasise the potential richness of the latter, within-distribution effects.


2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (24) ◽  
pp. 243501
Author(s):  
Anna N. Matsukatova ◽  
Andrey V. Emelyanov ◽  
Anton A. Minnekhanov ◽  
Aleksandr A. Nesmelov ◽  
Artem Yu. Vdovichenko ◽  
...  

ce/papers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2-4) ◽  
pp. 2249-2254
Author(s):  
Jian‐Wei He ◽  
Lei Zhao ◽  
Yao‐Peng Liu ◽  
Siu‐Lai Chan

1985 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 598-610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Zamble ◽  
G. Marilyn Hadad ◽  
John B. Mitchell ◽  
Tim R. H. Cutmore

1979 ◽  
Vol 100 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 607-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Sluyters-Rehbach ◽  
J. Struys ◽  
J.H. Sluyters

1984 ◽  
Vol 109 (4) ◽  
pp. 398-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.C. Evans ◽  
A.Y. Obaid ◽  
C.C. Rowlands

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 333-357
Author(s):  
D.M. OLIVEIRA ◽  
N.A. SILVA ◽  
C.C. RIBEIRO ◽  
S.E.C. RIBEIRO

Abstract In this paper the simplified method to evaluate final efforts using γ z coefficient is studied considering the variation of the second order effects with the height of the buildings. With this purpose, several reinforced concrete buildings of medium height are analyzed in first and second order using ANSYS software. Initially, it was checked that the (z coefficient should be used as magnifier of first order moments to evaluate final second order moments. Therefore, the study is developed considering the relation (final second order moments/ first order moments), calculated for each story of the structures. This moments relation is called magnifier of first order moments, "γ", and, in the ideal situation, it must coincide with the γ z value. However, it is observed that the reason γ /γ z varies with the height of the buildings. Furthermore, using an statistical analysis, it was checked that γ /γ z relation is generally lower than 1.05 and varies significantly in accordance with the considered building and with the presence or not of symmetry in the structure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document