The Role of Compassion and Sustainability Awareness on Fair Trade Fashion Consumption with Internet Engagement as a Moderator in advance

Author(s):  
Shireen Musa ◽  
Pradeep Gopalakrishna ◽  
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 32-46
Author(s):  
Kathleen Mintarja ◽  
Priscilia Christian Kadim ◽  
Stella Claresta Alexander

The second half of the twentieth century witnessed unprecedented growth in the number of international actors. There has been a dramatic increase in the number of non-state actors that, on many occasions, helped solve problems and improve lives. This makes the responsibility of people’s welfare no longer only held by the government. One of the most prominent examples is the role of Body Shop on improving the living standard of Rwandan. Twenty four years after the genocide that killed almost 800,000 people, the country of Rwanda is rebuilding with the support of international communities, including multinational corporations. The Body Shop’s Community Trade commitment has been a key part of bringing local producers into international supply chains and empowering them. Therefore, the research question in this paper is “How is the role of The Body Shop on implementing fair trade principles towards the Rwandan society?” To answer the research question, the authors use several theories and concepts; such as pluralism, multinational companies, and fair trade theory. In addition, the research method to be used by the authors is a qualitative study method. This research found that The Body Shop has launched a Moringa Community Trade program as an embodiment of efforts to improve the welfare of Rwandan people after the genocide occurred. This community trade initiative aims to be one small step forward to achieve financial stability for the people currently living and working in Rwanda.


2007 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Chatzidakis ◽  
Sally Hibbert ◽  
Andrew P. Smith
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 (1) ◽  
pp. 16656
Author(s):  
Rommel O. Salvador ◽  
Altaf G Merchant ◽  
Elizabeth A. Alexander

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 139-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon H. Dash ◽  
Nina Kajiji ◽  
Domenic Vonella

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria del Mar Garcia-De los Salmones ◽  
Andrea Perez
Keyword(s):  

1993 ◽  
Vol 8 (0) ◽  
pp. 59-89
Author(s):  
Jong Won Choi

In this paper, we identify three systematic performance biases in the Korean antitrust system: the absence of structural enforcement, the minimal role of antitrust agencies in anticompetitive major industrial policy-making, and the biased conception of the problems of economic concentration. After examining five competing hypothesis based on current implementation literature, we attribute the performance biases mainly to the limited bureaucratic expertise and skills required for complex structural enforcement and to the biased perceptions and expectations, inherent in the policy environment, about the roles of the antitrust system. Further, we connect the two factors above, found in the post-decision period, with some conspicuous features of the preceding enactment process of the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document