The International Monetary Fund--financial medic to the world?: a primer on mission, operations, and public policy issues

1999 ◽  
Vol 37 (04) ◽  
pp. 37-2270-37-2270
2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-92
Author(s):  
Robert M. Stern

This paper considers the key policy issues related to liberalisation of trade in financial services that the International Monetary Fund (IMF) should be concerned with, and the role the IMF has played in advising on policies related to trade in financial services in its bilateral and multilateral surveillance and in conditionality attached to lending programmes. The IMF staff were generally aware of the literature and country experiences showing the benefits of financial liberalisation. But Fund advice in support of liberalisation can be best interpreted to be in support of country unilateral policy actions and the dynamics of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) accession process.


Author(s):  
Ruben Lee

This chapter examines a unique set of assessments of securities markets and their regulation, from countries around the world, in order to provide a global perspective on policymakers' viewpoints about the regulation and governance of market infrastructure institutions. The assessments were undertaken as part of an initiative called the Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP), implemented jointly by the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. Each assessment evaluates the extent to which a country's securities markets regulatory regime reflects internationally recognized standards. The assessments prepared for the FSAP since its inception in 1999 up until 2006 are analyzed. Together they provide insights on three topics: how exchanges, central counterparties, and central securities depositories are regulated and governed globally; official perceptions on the optimal way of regulating markets and market infrastructure institutions; and the assumptions that are often made when examining the governance and regulation of market infrastructure institutions.


Author(s):  
Gary Murphy

Since Irish independence in 1922, governance structures have been excessively secretive. Political and civil service elites operated on a presumption of secrecy and a principle that the public did not need to know about decisions being taken in their name. In the last two decades, a number of policy innovations have gone some way towards providing for a more open polity. These include Ombudsman, regulation of lobbying, and freedom of information legislation, enacted over concerns about payments to politicians and a series of catastrophic public policy decisions that led to the bailout of the Irish economy by the International Monetary Fund, the European Commission, and the European Central Bank. This chapter assesses the importance of the principle of open government in modern Irish politics. It examines the nature of secrecy, assesses the tentative opening up of government since the 1980s, and analyses the open government proposals introduced since 2011.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document