scholarly journals Derivatives of Nostratic Root Morpheme Ya - “To Shine, To Glow, To Get Warm” in Turkic Languages

Author(s):  
Baba B. Maharramly
10.29007/kcnh ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olga Nevzorova ◽  
Alfiia Galieva ◽  
Dzhavdet Suleymanov

This study is aimed at exploring the semantic properties of Tatar affixes. Turkic languages have complicated morphology and syntax, which is a challenge for language processing.The fundamental principle of inflection and derivation in Tatar, as well as in other Turkic languages, is agglutination, when the stem joins postpositive affixes in a strictly determined order.The Tatar language has affixes of different types:a) derivational affixes expressing only lexical meaning and forming new words;b) inflectional affixes changing the word form (for example, case affixes);c) affixes serving as means of derivation as well as inflection.The current study is devoted to the ambiguous Tatar –lık polyfunctional affix which may be joined to nominal, adjectival and verbal stems and form derivatives of different types depending on contextual environment, the meaning of the stem and the composition of the affixal chain of a derivative. -Lık affix is a productive affix in modern Tatar which builds nominal, adjectival and verbal derivatives.The answer to the question of the number of the types of derivatives and word forms produced with -lık affix is not trivial, and different researchers distinguish different types of derivatives.Based on a thorough analysis of Tatar derivatives containing - lık affix we identified some empirical features of these constructs and then performed their manual and automatic classification. Four classes were distinguished. For our experiments we used data from the Tatar National Corpus “Tugan Tel” (http://corpus.antat.ru).The results obtained may be used for disambiguation in Tatar National Corpus and for analyzing other Tatar ambiguous affixes.


2013 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 184-200
Author(s):  
Arnaud Fournet

The paper first presents a little-known language, Mokša, belonging to the Uralic family, and investigates adverbs as they were listed in the first linguistic description of Mokša published by Ahlquist in 1861. It is shown that originally all adverbial forms in Mokša were motivated and transparent derivatives of deictics, adjectives and nouns. There apparently did not exist primary adverbs, unanalyzable in the synchronic system of Proto-Mokša. The unanalyzable adverbs stem from recent borrowings taken from Russian and Turkic languages. This situation opens the way toward a kind of lexical utopia where there would exist no primary unanalyzable adverbial form in a language.


1982 ◽  
Vol 85 (1) ◽  
pp. 257-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Graja ◽  
M. Przybylski ◽  
B. Butka ◽  
R. Swietlik

2002 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor D. Sadekov ◽  
Alexander V. Zakharov ◽  
Alexander A. Maksimenko
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document