scholarly journals A Case of Long-term Follow-up after Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis with Left-side Condylar Deformity in Mandibular Deficiency

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 284-292
Author(s):  
YUTARO TAKAMURA ◽  
SACHIO TAMAOKI ◽  
TAKASHI KAJII ◽  
HIROYUKI ISHIKAWA
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 4118
Author(s):  
Suen A. N. Lie ◽  
Britt H. B. T. Engelen ◽  
Veronique C. M. L. Timmer ◽  
Nico M. P. Vrijens ◽  
Paolo Asperio ◽  
...  

Background: Dental Class II is the most common indication for combined orthodontic-orthognathic treatment. Intermolar mandibular distraction osteogenesis (IMDO) treatment was performed during the growth spurt, to avoid surgery at a later age. The aim of this study is to present our first experience with IMDO. Methods: This is a retrospective case series of patients who underwent an IMDO. All patients showed mandibular retrognathism, and orthodontic treatment with functional appliances was not successful. Results: In total, 20 patients (mean age of 14.8 years (SD = 0.9 ys) were included. All patients achieved a Class I occlusion. An average length gain of 9.6 mm (SD = 3.7 mm) was reached. In one patient an abscess occurred. Nine patients presented with root fractures of the second molar; three were lost, one treated endodontically. The average time between insertion and removal of the distractors was 4.6 months (SD = 1.5 mths). In one case a premature consolidation was seen. Conclusion: We achieved satisfactory results with IMDO, although undesirable effects occurred. An advantage is the manageable overall treatment time. Open questions concern the occurrence of root fractures. Furthermore, the question of long-term stability is open. The question of dynamic distraction treatment in relation to temporomandibular joint changes can only be answered in the long term.


2016 ◽  
Vol 137 (2) ◽  
pp. 375e-385e ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma C. Paes ◽  
Gerhard K. P. Bittermann ◽  
Dirk Bittermann ◽  
Marvick M. Muradin ◽  
Rose van Hogezand ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 146531252110598
Author(s):  
Ho-Jin Kim ◽  
Hyo-Sang Park

Severe mandibular deficiency caused by temporomandibular joint (TMJ) ankyloses produces functional and aesthetic problems that require complicated long-term treatment. In this case report, we describe the benefits of using microimplant mechanics for controlling the direction of distraction during distraction osteogenesis and for performing the movement of teeth. We also present its remarkable results and long-term stability. A 20-year-old girl presented with a convex profile due to severe mandibular retrognathia after a history of several TMJ surgeries for bilateral TMJ ankyloses. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) was performed, and elastics were placed between the microimplants to control the direction of distraction. Subsequently, after retraction of the maxillary anterior teeth and distalisation of the whole mandibular dentition, the facial profile was markedly improved, and good interdigitation was obtained. The six-year follow-up retention and overall stability were satisfactory with good interdigitation and jaw function.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Hong ◽  
Elise Graham ◽  
James Belyea ◽  
S. Mark Taylor ◽  
Donald B. Kearns ◽  
...  

Background. Many studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) in alleviating the micrognathia-associated upper airway obstruction but very few studies have focused on long-term dental outcomes. Objective. To report the effect of MDO on developing deciduous molars in the distraction area. Methods. A retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients with Pierre Robin sequence who underwent MDO with documented long-term dental assessments. Results. Ten children (mean age at surgery 69.8 days; 6 boys and 4 girls) were included for analysis. All patients underwent bilateral MDO with an inverted L-shaped osteotomy to avoid injuring tooth buds. The dental developmental stage was primary dentition in all children. Overall, 3 patients developed minor dental problems involving 4 molar teeth (2 root malformations and 2 shape anomalies) but they did not require any interventions. Conclusion. Significant primary molar developmental complications were not seen in our patients. The use of internal distractor device with an inverted L-shaped osteotomy seems to be a safe surgical approach in regards to dental outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document