scholarly journals Visual loss after aesthetic facial filler injection: a literature review on an ophthalmologic issue

2022 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliana Mika Kato ◽  
Suzana Matayoshi
2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (11) ◽  
pp. 2859-2866
Author(s):  
Gerardo Graue ◽  
Dora Aline Ochoa Araujo ◽  
Cristina Plata Palazuelos ◽  
Juan Ángel Núñez Medrano ◽  
Fernando José López San Juan ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Hayson Chenyu Wang ◽  
Nanze Yu ◽  
Xiaojun Wang ◽  
Ruijia Dong ◽  
Xiao Long ◽  
...  

Abstract Background With the popularity of facial filler injections, increased severe adverse events, such as cerebral embolism, have been reported. Objectives This article aims to summarize the clinical manifestations, and proposed mechanism of the filler-induced cerebral embolism (FICE) cases. Methods A literature review was performed with the search keywords including “filler injection, hyaluronic acid, fat graft, cerebral infarction/embolism, stroke, cerebrovascular infarction, disorders of consciousness, and hemiplegia”. Results Among the 43 cases of FICE from 35 articles enrolled, 37 patients were female, and 6 were male. Twenty-nine of these patients received fat grafting, followed by 12 who received HA injection. Most of the injection sites of FICE patients were at the glabella, followed by temporal, forehead, and nasal areas. Among 30 patients receiving injection under local anesthesia, 43.33% presented with neurological symptoms during the procedure. The main symptoms were consciousness disorders and hemiplegia. Most of the embolization sites were in the middle cerebral artery, followed by frontal lobe infarction and anterior cerebral artery infarction. Three patients developed cerebral hemorrhage after embolism. Twenty-six patients presented with newly acquired vision loss, and 17 patients did not have newly acquired vision loss. The management for FICE cases included embolectomy, thrombolysis, decompressive craniectomy, antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy and symptomatic and nutritional treatment. Nearly half of the patients recovered or improved in neurological manifestations but not the visual loss. Five patients died. Conclusions FICE is a severe complication following facial filler injection. Careful prevention, timely identification and treatment are crucial to decrease the morbidity and mortality of FICE.


Author(s):  
Elizabeth Hawkes ◽  
Mayank A Nanavaty

ABSTRACT Keratoconus is a progressive corneal ectactic condition that can lead to visual loss. Despite being the most common cause for keratoplasty in the developed world the aetiology is unknown. It is thought to be multifactorial, with genetic and environmental factors implicated. The association of eye rubbing and pathogenesis of keratoconus has been well documented. In this review, we collate the existing literature and summarize the current knowledge of the role of eye rubbing in the pathogenesis of keratoconus. How to cite this article Hawkes E, Nanavaty MA. Eye Rubbing and Keratoconus: A Literature Review. Int J Kerat Ect Cor Dis 2014;3(3):118-121.


2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Jong Suk Lee ◽  
Jun Yup Kim ◽  
Se Joon Woo

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. e228323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Annette Erika Bachmeier ◽  
Cameron Snell ◽  
Adam Morton

Visual loss in pregnancy may be caused by a variety of reasons including pituitary adenomas. Prolactinomas (PRLs) are the most common hormone-secreting tumours in pregnant women. As most PRLs present with menstrual abnormalities, infertility or galactorrhoea, they are most commonly diagnosed before pregnancy. We present the case of a 30-year-old primigravida who presented at 36+5 weeks gestation with headaches and left-sided visual loss. MRI of the pituitary gland confirmed a 10×11 mm left suprasellar mass. Results of her anterior pituitary function were unremarkable for her gestational age. Postpartum, she underwent an endoscopic endonasal resection of the pituitary tumour. The histology was consistent with a PRL. Literature review reveals only one possible case of a new diagnosis of a PRL during pregnancy. It highlights the importance to consider a wide range of differential diagnoses when assessing visual loss in pregnancy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document