scholarly journals Single-Stage Endoscopic Stone Extraction and Cholecystectomy during the Same Hospitalization

2019 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshiaki Terauchi ◽  
Hiroharu Shinozaki ◽  
Satoshi Shinozaki ◽  
Yuichi Sasakura ◽  
Masaru Kimata ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chih-Ming Liang ◽  
Yi-Chun Chiu ◽  
Lung-Sheng Lu ◽  
Cheng-Kun Wu ◽  
Fai-Meng Sou ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of removing a single-stage, retrograde, endoscopic common bile duct stone in patients with mild and moderate acute cholangitis associated with choledocholithiasis.Methods: We enrolled 196 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-naïve patients diagnosed with acute cholangitis and choledocholithiasis between September 2018 and February 2020 at a single hospital. For eligible patients, single-stage treatment involved stone removal at initial ERCP. Early ERCP was defined as ERCP performed ≤ 72 hours following diagnosis in the emergency room.Results: The final analysis included 138 patients. The success rate of complete stone extraction was similar in patients with mild and moderate cholangitis (88.5% vs. 91.7%; p = 0. 536). Complication rates were also comparable between the two groups. In the moderate cholangitis group, the length of hospitalization declined significantly among patients who underwent early single-stage ERCP (10.6 ± 6.1 vs. 18.7 ± 12.5 days; p = 0.001) compared with patients treated with delayed ERCP. In the multivariate analysis, early ERCP indicated shorter hospitalization times (≤ 10 days) (odds ratio (OR), 7.689; p = 0.030), while endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage, for acute cholangitis only, indicated longer hospitalization times (OR, 0.358; p = 0.030). A stone size larger than 1.5 cm was an independent risk factor for stone extraction failure (OR, 24.507; p = 0.009).Conclusions: Single-stage, retrograde, endoscopic common bile duct stone removal may be safe and effective for patients with mild and moderate cholangitis. The benefit of early single-stage ERCP (≤ 72 hours) was reflected mainly by reduced hospitalization time and costs.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03754491.


2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (9) ◽  
pp. 2403-2411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Siert K. Reinders ◽  
Dirk J. Gouma ◽  
Dirk T. Ubbink ◽  
Bert van Ramshorst ◽  
Djamila Boerma

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 12-12
Author(s):  
L. Andrew Evans ◽  
Benjamin Moses ◽  
Kevin Rice ◽  
Craig Robson ◽  
Allen F. Morey

1989 ◽  
Vol 50 (C1) ◽  
pp. C1-813-C1-817
Author(s):  
M. ARNOULD ◽  
F. BAETEN ◽  
D. DARQUENNES ◽  
Th. DELBAR ◽  
C. DOM ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 75 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sherif Emara ◽  
Hassan Nablsi ◽  
Tarek ELKammash ◽  
Mohamed Sief ◽  
Khaled Attia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 7369-7378
Author(s):  
Ky-Quang Pham ◽  
Xuan-Truong Le ◽  
Cong-Truong Dinh

Splitter blades located between stator blades in a single-stage axial compressor were proposed and investigated in this work to find their effects on aerodynamic performance and operating stability. Aerodynamic performance of the compressor was evaluated using three-dimensional Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations using the k-e turbulence model with a scalable wall function. The numerical results for the typical performance parameters without stator splitter blades were validated in comparison with experimental data. The numerical results of a parametric study using four geometric parameters (chord length, coverage angle, height and position) of the stator splitter blades showed that the operational stability of the single-stage axial compressor enhances remarkably using the stator splitter blades. The splitters were effective in suppressing flow separation in the stator domain of the compressor at near-stall condition which affects considerably the aerodynamic performance of the compressor.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document