Transcystic or Transductal Stone Extraction during Single-Stage Treatment of Choledochocystolithiasis: A Systematic Review

2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (9) ◽  
pp. 2403-2411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Siert K. Reinders ◽  
Dirk J. Gouma ◽  
Dirk T. Ubbink ◽  
Bert van Ramshorst ◽  
Djamila Boerma
Author(s):  
Soledad Arribalzaga ◽  
Aitor Viribay ◽  
Julio Calleja-González ◽  
Diego Fernández-Lázaro ◽  
Arkaitz Castañeda-Babarro ◽  
...  

Due to the high metabolic and physical demands in single-stage one-day ultra-trail (SOUT) races, athletes should be properly prepared in both physical and nutritional aspects in order to delay fatigue and avoid associated difficulties. However, high carbohydrate (CHO) intake would seem to increase gastrointestinal (GI) problems. The main purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate CHO intake during SOUT events as well as its relationship with fatigue (in terms of internal exercise load, exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD) and post-exercise recovery) and GI problems. A structured search was carried out in accordance with PRISMA guidelines in the following: Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Scopus databases up to 16 March 2021. After conducting the search and applying the inclusion/exclusion criteria, eight articles in total were included in this systematic review, in all of which CHO intake involved gels, energy bars and sports drinks. Two studies associated higher CHO consumption (120 g/h) with an improvement in internal exercise load. Likewise, these studies observed that SOUT runners whose intake was 120 g/h could benefit by limiting the EIMD observed by CK (creatine kinase), LDH (lactate dehydrogenase) and GOT (aspartate aminotransferase), and also improve recovery of high intensity running capacity 24 h after a trail marathon. In six studies, athletes had GI symptoms between 65–82%. In summary, most of the runners did not meet CHO intake standard recommendations for SOUT events (90 g/h), while athletes who consumed more CHO experienced a reduction in internal exercise load, limited EIMD and improvement in post-exercise recovery. Conversely, the GI symptoms were recurrent in SOUT athletes depending on altitude, environmental conditions and running speed. Therefore, a high CHO intake during SOUT events is important to delay fatigue and avoid GI complications, and to ensure high intake, it is necessary to implement intestinal training protocols.


2019 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshiaki Terauchi ◽  
Hiroharu Shinozaki ◽  
Satoshi Shinozaki ◽  
Yuichi Sasakura ◽  
Masaru Kimata ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 134 (5) ◽  
pp. 922-931 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nima Khavanin ◽  
Sumanas W. Jordan ◽  
Aksharananda Rambachan ◽  
John Y. S. Kim

Gland Surgery ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 545-557
Author(s):  
Pedro Ciudad ◽  
Oscar J. Manrique ◽  
Samyd S. Bustos ◽  
Mouchammed Agko ◽  
Tony Chieh-Ting Huang ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-110
Author(s):  
Ahmed Adam ◽  
Deshin Reddy

Background: To describe a simple, novel stone extraction technique using the transvaginal route for large renal calculi encountered during laparoscopic/robotic pyelolithotomy. Methods: After a standard approach laparoscopic pyelolithotomy in a patient with a large (42 × 36 mm) pelvic calculus, Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty was performed. A transverse posterior colpotomy was performed laparoscopically with the assistance of the Colpassist Vaginal Positioning Device (Boston Scientific) and the calculus was extracted, intact, through the vagina with the aid of an endoscopic retrieval bag. The vaginal incision was then closed intra-corporeally. A systematic review on the topic was also performed. Results: The stone was removed in its entirety through an occult vaginal incision. There were no complications reported and the patient was stone free at follow-ups. Conclusions: This simple, novel technique is an easily reproducible method, for the removal of large urinary calculi during either traditional laparoscopic or robotic-assisted laparoscopic stone surgery in the appropriate female patient. It avoids the need for additional abdominal incisions or complex techniques involving lithotripsy which may be more complicated and time consuming. All previously published stone extraction techniques for large calculi (greater than 20 mm) within this systematic review are also critically appraised.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document