The Quarter Quandary: An Illustration of NCTM's Professional Teaching Standards

1998 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 160-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denise S. Mewborn

The Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics (NCTM 1991) identifies four elements of teachers’ work that have a significant impact on the mathematics learning that takes place in a classroom: tasks, discourse, environment, and analysis.

1992 ◽  
Vol 85 (8) ◽  
pp. 656-659
Author(s):  
Margaret A. Farrell

The next four articles in this department address issues related to four of the six standards in the section of the Professional Teaching Standards (NCTM 1991) titled “Standards for the Professional Development of Teachers of Mathematics.” The series will pay particular attention to the ways in which these standards affect the in-service teacher of mathematics, whose ongoing professional development depends. to a large extent, on individual commitment, reflection, and action. We hope that these articles will furnish a basis from which teachers can begin to examine and improve their own classroom instruction.


1994 ◽  
Vol 87 (5) ◽  
pp. 354-358
Author(s):  
Vicky L. Kouba

A common call heard today is that we want “reflective teachers” who have the skills and expetiences necessary to engage in a high-level examination of teaching. Indeed, the authors of the NCTM's Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics (Professional Teaching Standards), published in 1991, recommend that teachers assume more of the responsibility for both self-evaluation and peer evaluation.


1994 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-7
Author(s):  
Millard E. Showalter

As set forth in the Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics (NCTM 1991), a primary goal for teaching and learning mathematics is the development of mathematical power for all students. To accomplish this goal, the teaching standards document recommends that teachers select interesting and intellectually stimulating mathematical tasks, present opportunities for students to deepen their understanding of mathematics and its applications, promote the investigation of mathematical ideas, use technology to pursue these investigations, find connections to previous and developing knowledge, and employ cooperativelearning experiences (NCTM 1991, 1).


1991 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 44-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah Loewenberg Ball

Despite its title, the Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics (NCTM 1991) should not be read as a set of prescriptions about how to teach. The document will not deliver on such expectations, not because it fails but because no document can prescribe good teaching. No set of standards can be expected to stipulate what teachers should do. The potential of the Professional Teaching Standards rests instead in its use as a set of tools with which to construct productive conversations about teaching. It should be viewed as a resource with which to build teaching rather than as a measuring stick by which to judge teaching. With new ideas about things to pay attention to in our classrooms, to ask ourselves, to wonder about, we would have increased power to analyze and improve our teaching — alone and as members of a wider community of educators. In this article I explore possible outcomes of using the Professional Teaching Standards in such ways.


1997 ◽  
Vol 90 (2) ◽  
pp. 138-143
Author(s):  
Catherine A. Brown ◽  
Margaret S. Smith

In the Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics (NCTM 1991), the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics has explicated what a teacher needs to know and be able to do to teach mathematics in the spirit of reform. Teachers' current knowledge of mathematics and mathematics pedagogy may not be adequate to meet the new instructional goals. Toward this end, the Professional Teaching Standards document includes six standards that are intended to guide the preparation, support, and career development of teachers. This article focuses on one of these standards—Standard 4: Knowing Mathematical Pedagogy—which is integral to the effective teaching of mathematics.


1991 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-22
Author(s):  
Deborah Loewenberg Ball ◽  
Susan N. Friel

In March of this year, NCTM published the Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics (Professional Teaching Standards) (1991), a companion to the earlier Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (Curriculum and Evaluation Standards) (1989). Whereas the earlier document focuses on curriculum, the new document addresses teaching. It elaborates the Curriculum and Evaluation Standards's vision of teaching, in which mathematical reasoning, problem solving, communication, and connections are central. It addresses such questions as, What are classrooms like in which students are able to encounter, develop, and use mathematical ideas and skills in the context of genuine problem and situations? What role might a teacher play in helping students learn to use a variety of resources and tools, such as calculators and computers, and concrete and pictorial models? What is meant by engaging students in mathematical reasoning—in making conjectures, presenting arguments, constructing proofs—at various grade levels? How can adequate mathematical skill be developed in concert with mathematical reasoning? The list of questions can be extended indefinitely, for what we are trying to create is quite different from what we experienced when we were in school and even quite different from much of what we are doing now as teachers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document