Seasonal changes in zooplankton community structure at kurnur dam

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 178
Author(s):  
Sahebagouda S. Patil ◽  
Vithal R. More
Author(s):  
Natalia Kuczyńska-Kippen ◽  
Barbara Nagengast ◽  
Sofia Celewicz-Gołdyn ◽  
Małgorzata Klimko

Zooplankton community structure within various macrophyte stands of a small water body in relation to seasonal changes in water level


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Estelle Coguiec ◽  
Elizaveta A. Ershova ◽  
Malin Daase ◽  
Tobias R. Vonnahme ◽  
Owen S. Wangensteen ◽  
...  

Phyto- and zooplankton in Arctic and sub-Arctic seas show very strong seasonal changes in diversity and biomass. Here we document the seasonal variability in the mesozooplankton community structure in a sub-Arctic fjord in Northern Norway based on monthly sampling between November 2018 and February 2020. We combined traditional morphological zooplankton identification with DNA metabarcoding of a 313 base pair fragment of the COI gene. This approach allowed us to provide the most detailed mesozooplankton species list known for this region across an entire year, including both holo- and meroplankton. The zooplankton community was dominated by small copepods throughout the sampling period both in terms of abundance and relative sequence counts. However, meroplankton was the most diverse group, especially within the phylum polychaeta. We identified four distinct periods based on the seasonal analysis of the zooplankton community composition. The pre-spring bloom period (February–March) was characterized by low abundance and biomass of zooplankton. The spring bloom (April) was characterized by the presence of Calanus young stages, cirripedia and krill eggs. The spring-summer period (May–August) was characterized by a succession of meroplankton and a relatively high abundance of copepods of the genus Calanus spp. Finally, the autumn-winter period (September–December) was characterized by a high copepod diversity and a peak in abundance of small copepods (e.g., Oithona similis, Acartia longiremis, Pseudocalanus acuspes, Pseudocalanus elongatus, Pseudocalanus moultoni, Pseudocalanus minutus). During this period, we also observed an influx of boreal warm-water species which were notably absent during the rest of the year. Both the traditional community analysis and metabarcoding were highly complementary and with a few exceptions showed similar trends in the seasonal changes of the zooplankton community structure.


1998 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-78
Author(s):  
Takashi ARAKAWA ◽  
Norihiko YOSHIDA ◽  
Kimio HIRABAYASHI ◽  
Kazuya YOSHIZAWA

2009 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 556-561
Author(s):  
Gui-Jun YANG ◽  
Bo-Qiang QIN ◽  
Guang GAO ◽  
Xiao-Dong WANG ◽  
Hong-Yan WANG

Hydrobiologia ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 632 (1) ◽  
pp. 225-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Matthew Drenner ◽  
Stanley I. Dodson ◽  
Ray W. Drenner ◽  
John E. Pinder III

2018 ◽  
Vol 77 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zengling Ma ◽  
Hengguo Yu ◽  
Ronald Thring ◽  
Chuanjun Dai ◽  
Anglv Shen ◽  
...  

Algal bloom has been a subject of much research, especially the occurrence of blue-green algae (cyanobacteria) blooms and their effects on aquatic ecosystems. However, the interaction between green algae blooms and zooplankton community was rarely investigated. In the present study, the effects exerted by Scenedesmus dimorphus (green alga) bloom on the community structure of zooplankton and the top-down control of the bloom process mediated by the zooplankton were evaluated using a series of laboratory cultures. The results showed that a dense S. dimorphus bloom could change the zooplankton community structure by decreasing its diversity indices, leading to the enrichment of a particular zooplankton species, Brachionus calyciflorus. In the presence of mixed species of zooplankton, the density of S. dimorphus in the culture was decreased as determined by a change in total chlorophyll a (Chl a) concentration, which was about 200 μg L-1 lower than that of the zooplankton-free culture. Furthermore, the number of species belonging to Cladocera, Copepoda and Rotifera all decreased, with all the cladocerans disappeared in the co-culture within 2 weeks of culturing, while the density of rotifers increased from 818 (±243) ind L-1 at the time of inoculation to 40733 (±2173) ind L-1 on the 14th day post-inoculation. Grazing of S. dimorphus by the rotifer B. calyciflorus neutralized its growth, and the gradual increase in B. calyciflorus density eventually led to the collapse of the bloom. Furthermore, grazing by B. calyciflorus also led to a decrease in the maximal photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm) of photosystem II (PSII). The combined changes occurring in the zooplankton community structure during the process of S. dimorphus bloom and the negative effects of grazing on algal growth, morphology and photosynthetic activities confirmed the key role of zooplankton in the control of algal bloom. The results of the study therefore indicated that dense algal blooms caused by non-toxic algae could still remain a threat to aquatic ecosystems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document