Palliative care for head and neck cancer patients division of surgical operation and palliative medicine

Toukeibu Gan ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 300-304
Author(s):  
Naohito Shimoyama ◽  
Toru Iizuka ◽  
Megumi Shimoyama
2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19613-e19613
Author(s):  
Kimberson Tanco ◽  
David Hui ◽  
Sun Hyun Kim ◽  
Jung Hye Kwon ◽  
Tao Zhang ◽  
...  

e19613 Background: We previously examined factors associated with delayed PC referral. Little is known about the actual proportion of patients referred to PC. We determined the proportion of patients who had a PC consultation at our cancer center and the predictors of referral. Methods: All adult patients in the Houston area who died of advanced cancer between 9/1/2009 and 2/28/2010 while under the care of our institution were included. We collected baseline demographics and data on PC referral. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with PC referral. Results: 386/912 (42%) decedents had a PC referral, and 179 (46%) were seen initially as outpatients. In multivariate analysis, PC referral was associated with younger age (odds ratio (OR) 0.98 per year; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.97-0.99; P<0.001), married status (OR 1.5; 1.1-2.0; P=0.005), and gynecologic cancer (OR 1.9, 1.1-3.5, P=0.02 relative to lung). Among patients with a PC referral, outpatient consultation was more likely among patients with head and neck cancer (OR=5.5, 1.7-17.6, P=0.004 relative to lung). In contrast, hematologic malignancy was associated with decreased PC referral (OR=0.59, 0.36-0.97, P=0.04), fewer outpatient PC consultations (OR=0.3, 0.1-0.7, P=0.01) and less time from referral to death (Table). Conclusions: Younger, married patients and those with gynecologic cancer were more like to be referred to palliative care. Head and neck cancer patients were more often seen as PC outpatients. Patients with hematologic malignancies had fewer PC referrals and often late in the disease trajectory compared to patients with solid tumors. [Table: see text]


Author(s):  
Vijay Maruti Patil ◽  
Pankaj Singhai ◽  
Vanita Noronha ◽  
Atanu Bhattacharjee ◽  
Jayita Deodhar ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Early palliative care (EPC) is an important aspect of cancer management but has never been evaluated in patients with head and neck cancer. Hence, we performed this study to determine whether the addition of EPC to standard therapy leads to an improvement in the quality of life (QOL), decrease in symptom burden and improvement in overall survival. Methods Adult patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck region planned for palliative systemic therapy, were allocated 1:1 to either standard systemic therapy without (STD arm) or with comprehensive EPC service referral (EPC arm). Patients were administered the revised Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS-r) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy for head and neck cancer (FACIT HN) questionnaire at baseline and every 1 month thereafter for 3 months. The primary endpoint was a change in the QOL measured at 3 months after random assignment. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results Ninety patients were randomly assigned to each arm. There was no statistical difference in the change in the FACT-H&N total score (P = .94), FACT-H&N Trial Outcome Index (P = .95), FACT- G (general) total (P = .84) and ESAS-r scores at 3 months between the two arms. The median overall survival was similar between the two arms (Hazard ratio for death = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.74–1.35). There were 5 in-hospital deaths in both arms (5.6% for both, P = .99). Conclusions In this phase III study, the integration of EPC in head and neck cancer patients did not lead to an improvement in the QOL or survival.


2011 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-157
Author(s):  
Hideki Okubo ◽  
Yoshiyuki Kizawa ◽  
Keiji Tabuchi ◽  
Akira Hara

2006 ◽  
Vol 126 (9) ◽  
pp. 975-980 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quirine C.P. Ledeboer ◽  
Lilly-Ann Van Der Velden ◽  
Maarten F. De Boer ◽  
Louw Feenstra ◽  
Jean F. A. Pruyn

2013 ◽  
Vol 42 (10) ◽  
pp. 1282
Author(s):  
S. Siddiqui ◽  
M. Zolotar ◽  
C. Schilling ◽  
V. Pace ◽  
M. McGurk

2001 ◽  
Vol 94 (10) ◽  
pp. 935-940
Author(s):  
Takayuki NAKAGAWA ◽  
Tadayoshi TAKASHIMA ◽  
Kenta TOMIYAMA

2020 ◽  
pp. 082585972095781
Author(s):  
Catriona Rachel Mayland ◽  
Hannah C. Doughty ◽  
Simon N. Rogers ◽  
Anna Gola ◽  
Stephen Mason ◽  
...  

Objectives: To report on direct experiences from advanced head and neck cancer patients, family carers and healthcare professionals, and the barriers to integrating specialist palliative care. Methods: Using a naturalistic, interpretative approach, within Northwest England, a purposive sample of adult head and neck cancer patients was selected. Their family carers were invited to participate. Healthcare professionals (representing head and neck surgery and specialist nursing; oncology; specialist palliative care; general practice and community nursing) were recruited. All participants underwent face-to-face or telephone interviews. A thematic approach, using a modified version of Colazzi’s framework, was used to analyze the data. Results: Seventeen interviews were conducted (9 patients, 4 joint with family carers and 8 healthcare professionals). Two main barriers were identified by healthcare professionals: “lack of consensus about timing of Specialist Palliative Care engagement” and “high stake decisions with uncertainty about treatment outcome.” The main barrier identified by patients and family carers was “lack of preparedness when transitioning from curable to incurable disease.” There were 2 overlapping themes from both groups: “uncertainty about meeting psychological needs” and “misconceptions of palliative care.” Conclusions: Head and neck cancer has a less predictable disease trajectory, where complex decisions are made and treatment outcomes are less certain. Specific focus is needed to define the optimal way to initiate Specialist Palliative Care referrals which may differ from those used for the wider cancer population. Clearer ways to effectively communicate goals of care are required potentially involving collaboration between Specialist Palliative Care and the wider head and neck cancer team.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document