scholarly journals Diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of encapsulated papillary carcinoma: a single institution experience

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 66-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Steponavičienė ◽  
Daiva Gudavičienė ◽  
Rūta Briedienė ◽  
Donatas Petroška ◽  
Aušra Garnelytė

Background. Encapsulated papillary carcinoma (EPC) is a rare entity of breast cancer accounting for approximately 1–2% of all breast tumours. There are no evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of EPC. Materials and methods. From the database of the National Centre of Pathology (NCP), we obtained pathology reports of 19 patients with histologically confirmed EPC, who were treated at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) in Vilnius, Lithuania, between July 2009 and July 2015. Demographic, diagnostic and treatment data were collected from medical records retrospectively. Results. During the indicated period, 19 patients with EPC were treated at the NCI. Three of them had pure EPC, they were 74 to 81 years of age at the time of diagnosis (mean 76.7 years, median 75 years); all of them are still alive and no disease progression has been observed. Seven patients had EPC associated with carcinoma in situ. Nine patients had EPC associated with invasive breast ductal carcinoma. All patients underwent surgery, in most cases – wide local excision. Only one patient died. Conclusions. EPC is a rare form of breast cancer and usually presents with an invasive breast carcinoma or carcinoma in situ in postmenopausal women. Tumours have an excellent prognosis in the cases of pure EPC and in both EPC associated with carcinoma in situ (CIS) and invasive carcinoma.

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 237-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugo Villanueva ◽  
Sandra Grimm ◽  
Sagar Dhamne ◽  
Kimal Rajapakshe ◽  
Adriana Visbal ◽  
...  

Abstract Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a non-obligate precursor to most types of invasive breast cancer (IBC). Although it is estimated only one third of untreated patients with DCIS will progress to IBC, standard of care for treatment is surgery and radiation. This therapeutic approach combined with a lack of reliable biomarker panels to predict DCIS progression is a major clinical problem. DCIS shares the same molecular subtypes as IBC including estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) positive luminal subtypes, which encompass the majority (60–70%) of DCIS. Compared to the established roles of ER and PR in luminal IBC, much less is known about the roles and mechanism of action of estrogen (E2) and progesterone (P4) and their cognate receptors in the development and progression of DCIS. This is an underexplored area of research due in part to a paucity of suitable experimental models of ER+/PR + DCIS. This review summarizes information from clinical and observational studies on steroid hormones as breast cancer risk factors and ER and PR as biomarkers in DCIS. Lastly, we discuss emerging experimental models of ER+/PR+ DCIS.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. e0160835
Author(s):  
Hoe Suk Kim ◽  
Minji Jung ◽  
Sul Ki Choi ◽  
Woo Kyung Moon ◽  
Seung Ja Kim

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document