Treatment of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

2005 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 627-636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew H. Ko ◽  
Margaret A. Tempero

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma represents the fourth-leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. The vast majority of patients are diagnosed at advanced stages of the disease when surgery is no longer an option. For these patients, systemic therapy remains the mainstay of care. Although single-agent gemcitabine has remained the standard of care since its approval in 1997, improvements in patient outcomes may potentially be realized by (1) applying pharmacokinetic principles to optimize drug delivery, such as the administration of gemcitabine at a “fixed-dose rate” infusion; (2) combining gemcitabine with other cytotoxic agents for which evidence of synergy exists, such as platinum compounds; and (3) integrating novel targeted agents such as bevacizumab, erlotinib, and cetuximab into treatment paradigms, based on an increasing understanding of the molecular pathways that govern pancreatic tumor growth and maintenance. This article provides the evidence to support each of these approaches and highlights future directions in the management of metastatic pancreatic cancer.

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (14_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4120-4120
Author(s):  
B. Kobrossy ◽  
B. F. El-Rayes ◽  
A. F. Shields ◽  
U. Vaishampayan ◽  
L. Heilbrun ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (14_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4120-4120
Author(s):  
B. Kobrossy ◽  
B. F. El-Rayes ◽  
A. F. Shields ◽  
U. Vaishampayan ◽  
L. Heilbrun ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 357-357
Author(s):  
Xj Xiang ◽  
L Zhang ◽  
Jh Li ◽  
Zy Zhan ◽  
M Feng ◽  
...  

357 Background: The combination regimen of gemcitabine plus S1 (GS) as first-line chemotherapy has shown good efficacy in advanced pancreatic cancer. However, it is inconvenient to deliver gemcitabine on days 1 and 8 within one treatment cycle. In addition, previous studies have demonstrated that the gemcitabine administration by fixed dose rate infusion of 10 mg/m2/min should maximize the rate of intracellular accumulation of gemcitabine triphosphate and might improve clinical efficacy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of biweekly gemcitabine at fixed dose rate infusion combined with S1 (FGS) in chemonaive patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Methods: Forty-three eligible patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer received gemcitabine at a fixed dose of 10 mg/m2/min intravenously over a 2-h period on day 1, together with oral S1 40mg/m2twice daily on days 1 to 10, every 2 weeks. Tumor assessment was performed for every 3 cycles of chemotherapy. Results: All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 42 patients for efficacy. The overall response rate was 35.7% with 1 complete response, 14 partial responses, 17 stable diseases, and 10 progressions. Median time to progression was 5.9 months and median overall survival was 9.6 months. The main grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (30.2%), thrombocytopenia (6.9%), anemia (2.3%), nausea (4.6%), diarrhea (2.3%). Conclusions: The biweekly FGS regimen is active, well tolerated and conveniently delivered as first-line chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 379-385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew H. Ko ◽  
Elizabeth Dito ◽  
Brian Schillinger ◽  
Alan P. Venook ◽  
Emily K. Bergsland ◽  
...  

Purpose Although gemcitabine remains the standard of care for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, additional improvements may be realized by combining therapeutic agents with synergistic activity, and optimizing drug delivery using pharmacokinetic principles such as fixed dose rate (FDR) infusion. The objectives of this study were to determine safety and efficacy in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with FDR gemcitabine in combination with low-dose cisplatin. Patients and Methods Chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were treated with a combination of gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 at 10 mg/m2/min together with cisplatin 20 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Patient follow-up was performed using computerized tomographic scans and serial CA 19-9 measurements. Results A total of 51 patients were enrolled onto the study, with a median follow-up time of 215 days. Twenty-two of 40 patients (55.0%) with a baseline serum CA 19-9 level ≥ 2× the upper limit of normal demonstrated a ≥ 50% biomarker decline during treatment. Nine of 47 patients (19.1%) with measurable disease achieved a partial response, and 28 patients (59.6%) had disease stabilization for at least two treatment cycles. Median time to progression was 3.9 months and median survival was 7.1 months, with an estimated 1-year survival rate of 29%. The most frequently reported grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (52.9%) and thrombocytopenia (15.7%). Most patients were switched to an every-other-week dosing schedule. Conclusion The combination of FDR gemcitabine and cisplatin is well tolerated and appears to be an acceptable, albeit not clearly superior, alternative to other gemcitabine/platinum regimens for the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer.


Pancreas ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 431-432
Author(s):  
T Aimoto ◽  
E Uchida ◽  
Y Nakamura ◽  
A Katsuno ◽  
K Cho ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (33) ◽  
pp. 5506-5512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew H. Kulke ◽  
Margaret A. Tempero ◽  
Donna Niedzwiecki ◽  
Donna R. Hollis ◽  
Hedy L. Kindler ◽  
...  

PurposeThe relative value of gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy therapy and prolonged infusions of gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer remains controversial. We explored the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine administered at a fixed dose rate or in combination with cisplatin, docetaxel, or irinotecan in a multi-institutional, randomized, phase II study.Patients and MethodsPatients with metastatic pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned to one of the following four regimens: gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2on days 1, 8, and 15 with cisplatin 50 mg/m2on days 1 and 15 (arm A); gemcitabine 1,500 mg/m2at a rate of 10 mg/m2/min on days 1, 8, and 15 (arm B); gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2with docetaxel 40 mg/m2on days 1 and 8 (arm C); or gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2with irinotecan 100 mg/m2on days 1 and 8 (arm D). Patients were observed for response, toxicity, and survival.ResultsTwo hundred fifty-nine patients were enrolled onto the study, of whom 245 were eligible and received treatment. Anticipated rates of myelosuppression, fatigue, and expected regimen-specific toxicities were observed. The overall tumor response rates were 12% to 14%, and the median overall survival times were 6.4 to 7.1 months among the four regimens.ConclusionGemcitabine/cisplatin, fixed dose rate gemcitabine, gemcitabine/docetaxel, and gemcitabine/irinotecan have similar antitumor activity in metastatic pancreatic cancer. In light of recent negative randomized studies directly comparing several of these regimens with standard gemcitabine, none of these approaches can be recommended for routine use in patients with this disease.


Oncology ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 76 (5) ◽  
pp. 333-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brett E. Fortune ◽  
Xiaobai Li ◽  
Kavitha V. Kosuri ◽  
Lynn M. Weatherby ◽  
James P. Thomas ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document