Favorable Early-Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma

2006 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 233-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joachim Yahalom

The category of favorable early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) includes patients with Ann Arbor stages I or II disease with no bulky disease or B symptoms. The precise definition of favorable versus unfavorable early-stage disease may vary among American and European cooperative groups. The overall 10-year survival rate of patients with favorable early-stage HL exceeds 90%. Indeed, effective treatments for this group of patients have been available for more than 4 decades. However, treatment strategies have radically changed over the past 15 years and focus now on maintaining the high cure rate while reducing the risk of treatment-related long-term morbidity. The optimal treatment is still evolving, and more recently, reduction in the total amount of chemotherapy and in radiation field and dose has shown excellent results. Combined modality therapy is the preferred treatment for patients with classical favorable early-stage HL (nodular sclerosis or mixed cellularity histology). Patients with early-stage lymphocyte predominance HL are highly curable using involved-field radiation therapy (IFRT) alone and do not require chemotherapy. Classical favorable HL is also curable with radiotherapy alone or with chemotherapy alone, but larger fields and higher-dose radiation or longer chemotherapy is required compared with combined modality. The freedom from treatment failure rate is significantly better with a combination of short chemotherapy and IFRT than with either chemotherapy or radiotherapy alone. Although combined modality is the standard preferred treatment for favorable disease, radiation therapy alone or chemotherapy alone could be considered under special circumstances or as part of an investigational protocol.

Hematology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 (1) ◽  
pp. 135-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew M. Evens ◽  
Lale Kostakoglu

Abstract Given the excellent survival rates for early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), the young age of many patients, and concerns regarding acute and late treatment-related toxicities, there is a desire to have a predictive tool that enables therapy to be tailored toward the individual patient. Early (or interim) 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computerized tomography (FDG-PET/CT), as a test of tumor sensitivity to ongoing/planned therapy, has been shown to be prognostic for survival in HL. Based on results of interim FDG-PET/CT, therapy may be subsequently modified through minimization or via intensification for low- and high-risk patient populations, respectively (ie, response-adapted therapy). Important data have been generated to standardize the interpretability and reproducibility of interim FDG-PET/CT (eg, the Deauville 5-point system), and observational and noncontrolled prospective studies have produced evidence supporting the hypothesis that response-adapted therapy may potentially serve as a predictive tool. Furthermore, results from noninferiority phase 3 clinical trials randomizing early-stage HL patients with negative interim FDG-PET/CT to combined modality therapy versus chemotherapy alone have been reported. The current collective findings from these randomized early-stage HL studies have shown that acute relapse rates are lower with combined modality therapy, even in patients with negative interim FDG-PET/CT. Additional randomized response-adapted studies are ongoing and novel FDG-PET/CT applications involving quantitative techniques and innovative imaging modalities are being investigated to identify more robust imaging biomarkers. Treatment of early-stage HL remains a clinical management choice for physicians and patients to make with consideration of acute and long-term outcomes.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (23) ◽  
pp. 3356-3364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew M. Evens ◽  
Lale Kostakoglu

Abstract Given the excellent survival rates for early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), the young age of many patients, and concerns regarding acute and late treatment-related toxicities, there is a desire to have a predictive tool that enables therapy to be tailored toward the individual patient. Early (or interim) 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computerized tomography (FDG-PET/CT), as a test of tumor sensitivity to ongoing/planned therapy, has been shown to be prognostic for survival in HL. Based on results of interim FDG-PET/CT, therapy may be subsequently modified through minimization or via intensification for low- and high-risk patient populations, respectively (ie, response-adapted therapy). Important data have been generated to standardize the interpretability and reproducibility of interim FDG-PET/CT (eg, the Deauville 5-point system), and observational and noncontrolled prospective studies have produced evidence supporting the hypothesis that response-adapted therapy may potentially serve as a predictive tool. Furthermore, results from noninferiority phase 3 clinical trials randomizing early-stage HL patients with negative interim FDG-PET/CT to combined modality therapy versus chemotherapy alone have been reported. The current collective findings from these randomized early-stage HL studies have shown that acute relapse rates are lower with combined modality therapy, even in patients with negative interim FDG-PET/CT. Additional randomized response-adapted studies are ongoing and novel FDG-PET/CT applications involving quantitative techniques and innovative imaging modalities are being investigated to identify more robust imaging biomarkers. Treatment of early-stage HL remains a clinical management choice for physicians and patients to make with consideration of acute and long-term outcomes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 150 ◽  
pp. 236-244
Author(s):  
Karin Nielsen ◽  
Maja Vestmoe Maraldo ◽  
Anne Kiil Berthelsen ◽  
Annika Loft ◽  
Peter de Nully Brown ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8550-8550
Author(s):  
Shihab Ali ◽  
Adam J. Olszewski

8550 Background: Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a heterogeneous disease, but differences between nodular lymphocyte predominant (NLPHL) and classical (CHL) subtypes were previously studied in small cohorts preventing adjustment for confounders. We studied those differences based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program data. Methods: We analyzed SEER HL cases aged 16 years and over, diagnosed between 1995 and 2009. We studied the following endpoints: crude probability of HL-related death (HLRD), relative survival (using individual data in multivariate flexible parametric models) and risk of secondary malignancies (using competing risk regression). We studied the impact of radiotherapy (RT) in early-stage disease using a propensity score, adjusting for treatment selection and immortal time bias. Results: We identified 25,903 patients, with disparate age, race and stage distributions between subtypes. In a multivariate model, NLPHL demonstrated significantly better crude and net survival outcomes (Table), but in contrast to all CHL subtypes, it showed a steady increase in mortality rate after 2 years. The risk of secondary non-Hodgkin lymphoma was significantly higher in both NLPHL (hazard ratio, HR, 2.28, P=0.002) and lymphocyte-rich (LR) CHL (HR 2.08, P=0.01) than in nodular sclerosis (NS). The risk of other secondary malignancies did not differ between subtypes. After balancing confounding factors in treatment arms, RT in stage I/II was associated with improved survival in NS (HR, 0.78, P=0.001) and LR-CHL (HR 0.36, P<0.001), but not in NLPHL (HR 0.98, P=0.94) or in the remaining CHL subtypes. Conclusions: Studies of NLPHL and CHL subtypes should account for their disparate biology and clinical course. Prospective evaluation of NLPHL treatment strategies without RT is justified. [Table: see text]


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 4672-4672
Author(s):  
Amani Al-Kofide ◽  
Asim F. Belgaumi ◽  
Yasser Khafaga ◽  
Nicey Joseph ◽  
Rubina J. Malik ◽  
...  

Abstract The ABVD protocol is probably the most effective chemotherapy (CTX) regimen for the treatment of Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL), however the dose and volume, and indeed the need for radiation therapy (XRT) in combination remains uncertain. Pediatric patients (0–14 years) at our institution have been treated with ABVD either with or without XRT, based on the treating physician’s decision. Patients receiving XRT were usually given one or two cycles less of CTX than those without. Since 1998 we have used 1500cGy as the dose of XRT, however the field was determined by the radiation oncologist. Between 1990 and 2003, 152 patients were treated according to the ABVD protocol. Of these, 64 were treated with CTX alone, while 88 also received radiation as consolidation therapy (Combined modality therapy; CMT). Of those who received XRT 63 were administered a dose of 1500cGy. The remaining 25 received various higher doses (1655cGy: 1, 2400cGy: 9, 2500cGy: 10, 3500cGy: 3, 3680cGy: 1, 3980cGy:1). Patients who were treated with CMT were older (mean age 9.2 v. 7.4 years; p&lt;0.05), had less B-symptoms (10.2% v. 26.6%; p&lt;0.05), but not more bulky disease (43.2% v. 34.4%; p=0.2). CTX group had more patients with stage III and IV disease, while CMT group had more stage II disease (p&lt;0.05). With a median follow-up of 4 years, the actuarial overall survival (OS) and event free survival (EFS) at 5 years for all the patients is 97.3% and 88.0%, respectively. The OS and EFS for the patients treated with CTX and CMT were 95.3% v. 98.8% (p=0.4) and 85.1% v. 90.2% (p=0.3), respectively. We next looked at the patients who received only 1500cGy of radiation therapy. Of the 63 patients, 29 received extended field radiation (EFXRT) and 34 involved field radiation (IFXRT). Patients who received radiation were administered a median of two cycles of ABVD less than those who did not (median 4 v. 6 cycles; mean 4.3 v. 5.1, p&lt;0.05). OS at 5 years for the patients treated by CTX v. CMT/EFXRT v. CMT/IFXRT is 95.3%, 96.6% and 100%, respectively (p=0.3). The EFS for the same groups is 85.1%, 86.2% and 90.1% (p=0.4). Conclusion: Pediatric patients with HL can be treated successfully with minimal or no XRT. These results need to be confirmed in a prospective clinical trial.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document