scholarly journals Volumetric analysis of the articular eminence pneumatization using cone beam computed tomography

Author(s):  
Milushka QUEZADA ◽  
Jean PAUCAR ◽  
Roberto LEÓN ◽  
Maria Eugenia GUERRERO
2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Max-Philipp Lentzen ◽  
Ali-Farid Safi ◽  
Maximilian Riekert ◽  
Veerle Visser-Vandewalle ◽  
Andrea Grandoch ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 124 (4) ◽  
pp. 420-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francielle Silvestre Verner ◽  
Gina Delia Roque-Torres ◽  
Laura Ricardina Ramírez-Sotello ◽  
Karina Lopes Devito ◽  
Solange Maria Almeida

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dilhan İlgüy ◽  
Mehmet İlgüy ◽  
Erdoğan Fişekçioğlu ◽  
Semanur Dölekoğlu ◽  
Nilüfer Ersan

Aim. The aim of the present study was to examine the relationship between articular eminence inclination, height, and thickness of the roof of the glenoid fossa (RGF) according to age and gender and to assess condyle morphology including incidental findings of osseous characteristics associated with osteoarthritis (OA) of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).Materials and Methods. CBCT images of 105 patients were evaluated retrospectively. For articular eminence inclination and height, axial views on which the condylar processes were seen with their widest mediolateral extent being used as a reference view for secondary reconstruction. Condyle morphology was categorized both in the sagittal and coronal plane.Results. The mean values of eminence inclination and height of males were higher than those of females (P<0.05). There were significant differences in the RGF thickness in relation to sagittal condyle morphology. Among the group of OA, the mean value of the RGF thickness for “OA-osteophyte” group was the highest (1.59 mm), whereas the lowest RGF values were seen in the “OA-flattening.”Conclusion. The sagittal osteoarthritic changes may have an effect on RGF thickness by mechanical stimulation and changed stress distribution. Gender has a significant effect on eminence height (Eh) and inclination.


2010 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 160-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Liu ◽  
Raphael Olszewski ◽  
Emanuel Stefan Alexandroni ◽  
Reyes Enciso ◽  
Tianmin Xu ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: To determine the accuracy of volumetric analysis of teeth in vivo using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods: The physical volume (Vw) of 24 bicuspids extracted for orthodontic purposes (16 were imaged with the I-CAT and 8 with the CB MercuRay) were determined using the water displacement technique. Corresponding pretreatment CBCT image data were uploaded into Amira 4.0 for segmentation and radiographic volume (Va). All measurements were performed twice by two observers. The statistical difference between Vw and Va was assessed using a paired t-test. The intraobserver and interobserver reliability were determined by calculating Pearson correlation coefficients and intraclass correlation coefficients. Results: The overall mean Vw of teeth specimens was 0.553 ± 0.082 cm3, while the overall mean Va was 0.548 ± 0.079 cm3 (0.529 ± 0.078 cm3 for observer 1 and 0.567 ± 0.085 cm3 for observer 2). There were statistically significant differences between Va and Vw (P &lt; .05). Between observer 1 and observer 2, Va measurements were statistically significantly different (P &lt; .05). The interobserver and intraobserver correlation coefficient for Vw was high. Lastly, surface smoothing reduced the volume by 3% to 12%. Conclusions: In vivo determination of tooth volumes from CBCT data is feasible. The measurements slightly deviate from the physical volumes within −4% to 7%. Smoothing operations reduce volume measurements. Currently, no requirements for accuracy of volumetric determinations of tooth volume have been established.


2012 ◽  
Vol 81 (8) ◽  
pp. 1812-1816 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehmet Bayram ◽  
Saadettin Kayipmaz ◽  
Ömer Said Sezgin ◽  
Murat Küçük

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. 557-562
Author(s):  
M. Gulec ◽  
M. Tassoker ◽  
G. Magat ◽  
B. Lale ◽  
S. Ozcan ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Max-Philipp Lentzen ◽  
Matthias Zirk ◽  
Maximilian Riekert ◽  
Johannes Buller ◽  
Matthias Kreppel

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document