scholarly journals Types and automata

1990 ◽  
Vol 19 (316) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael I. Schwartzbach ◽  
Erik Meineche Schmidt
Keyword(s):  
Programming Languages ◽  
Finite Automata ◽  
Type System ◽  
Analogous Problem ◽  
Equivalence Type ◽  
Alternating Automata

A hierarchical type system for imperative programming languages gives rise to various computational problems, such as type equivalence, type ordering, etc. We present a particular class of finite automata which are shown to be isomorphic to type equations. All the relevant type concepts turn out to have well-known automata analogues, such as language equality, language inclusion, etc. This provides optimal or best known algorithms for the type system, by a process of translating type equations to automata, solving the analogous problem, and translating the result back to type equations. Apart from suggesting an implementation, this connection lends a certain naturality to our type system. We also introduce a very general form of extended (recursive) type equations which are explained in terms of (monotone) alternating automata. Since types are simply equationally defined trees, these results may have wider applications.

scholarly journals Subtree matching by pushdown automata

2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 331-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomás Flouri ◽  
Jan Janousek ◽  
Bořivoj Melichar
Keyword(s):  
Programming Languages ◽  
Theorem Proving ◽  
Systematic Approach ◽  
Finite Automata ◽  
Term Rewriting ◽  
Mechanical Theorem Proving ◽  
Pushdown Automaton ◽  
String Pattern ◽  
Pushdown Automata ◽  
Mechanical Theorem

Subtree matching is an important problem in Computer Science on which a number of tasks, such as mechanical theorem proving, term-rewriting, symbolic computation and nonprocedural programming languages are based on. A systematic approach to the construction of subtree pattern matchers by deterministic pushdown automata, which read subject trees in prefix and postfix notation, is presented. The method is analogous to the construction of string pattern matchers: for a given pattern, a nondeterministic pushdown automaton is created and is then determinised. In addition, it is shown that the size of the resulting deterministic pushdown automata directly corresponds to the size of the existing string pattern matchers based on finite automata.

Introduction to the Special Issue on Dependent Type Theory Meets Practical Programming

2004 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
GILLES BARTHE ◽  
PETER DYBJEN ◽  
PETER THIEMANN
Keyword(s):  
Programming Languages ◽  
Type Theory ◽  
Type System ◽  
Type Systems ◽  
Special Issue ◽  
Dependent Type Theory ◽  
Dependent Type

Modern programming languages rely on advanced type systems that detect errors at compile-time. While the benefits of type systems have long been recognized, there are some areas where the standard systems in programming languages are not expressive enough. Language designers usually trade expressiveness for decidability of the type system. Some interesting programs will always be rejected (despite their semantical soundness) or be assigned uninformative types.

scholarly journals Implicit self-adjusting computation for purely functional programs

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
YAN CHEN ◽  
JOSHUA DUNFIELD ◽  
MATTHEW A. HAMMER ◽  
UMUT A. ACAR
Keyword(s):  
Programming Languages ◽  
Type System ◽  
Type Systems ◽  
Type Inference ◽  
Source Program ◽  
Target Program ◽  
Implicit Approach ◽  
Asymptotic Complexity ◽  
Cost Semantics ◽  
Output Behavior

AbstractComputational problems that involve dynamic data, such as physics simulations and program development environments, have been an important subject of study in programming languages. Building on this work, recent advances in self-adjusting computation have developed techniques that enable programs to respond automatically and efficiently to dynamic changes in their inputs. Self-adjusting programs have been shown to be efficient for a reasonably broad range of problems, but the approach still requires an explicit programming style, where the programmer must use specific monadic types and primitives to identify, create, and operate on data that can change over time. We describe techniques for automatically translating purely functional programs into self-adjusting programs. In this implicit approach, the programmer need only annotate the (top-level) input types of the programs to be translated. Type inference finds all other types, and a type-directed translation rewrites the source program into an explicitly self-adjusting target program. The type system is related to information-flow type systems and enjoys decidable type inference via constraint solving. We prove that the translation outputs well- typed self-adjusting programs and preserves the source program's input–output behavior, guaranteeing that translated programs respond correctly to all changes to their data. Using a cost semantics, we also prove that the translation preserves the asymptotic complexity of the source program.

scholarly journals Featherweight generic confinement

2006 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 793-811 ◽  
Author(s):  
ALEX POTANIN ◽  
JAMES NOBLE ◽  
DAVE CLARKE ◽  
ROBERT BIDDLE
Keyword(s):  
Programming Languages ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Type System ◽  
Type Systems ◽  
General Purpose ◽  
Ownership Type ◽  
Essential Change ◽  
Polymorphic Type ◽  
Syntactic Restrictions

Existing approaches to object encapsulation either rely on ad hoc syntactic restrictions or require the use of specialised type systems. Syntactic restrictions are difficult to scale and to prove correct, while specialised type systems require extensive changes to programming languages. We demonstrate that confinement can be enforced cheaply in Featherweight Generic Java, with no essential change to the underlying language or type system. This result demonstrates that polymorphic type parameters can simultaneously act as ownership parameters and should facilitate the adoption of confinement and ownership type systems in general-purpose programming languages.

scholarly journals Type Checking Semantic Functions in ASDF

2004 ◽  
Vol 11 (35) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jørgen Iversen
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Programming Languages ◽  
Type System ◽  
Type Checking ◽  
Semantic Function ◽  
Semantic Framework ◽  
Language Constructs ◽  
Type Check

When writing semantic descriptions of programming languages, it is convenient to have tools for checking the descriptions. With frameworks that use inductively defined semantic functions to map programs to their denotations, we would like to check that the semantic functions result in denotations with certain properties. In this paper we present a type system for a modular style of the action semantic framework that, given signatures of all the semantic functions used in a semantic equation defining a semantic function, performs a soft type check on the action in the semantic equation.<br /> <br />We introduce types for actions that describe different properties of the actions, like the type of data they expect and produce, whether they can fail or have side effects, etc. A type system for actions which uses these new action types is presented. Using the new action types in the signatures of semantic functions, the language describer can assert properties of semantic functions and have the assertions checked by an implementation of the type system.<br /> <br />The type system has been implemented for use in connection with the recently developed formalism ASDF. The formalism supports writing language definitions by combining modules that describe single language constructs. This is possible due to the inherent modularity in ASDF. We show how we manage to preserve the modularity and still perform specialised type checks for each module.

scholarly journals Object Cloning for Ownership Systems

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Paley Guangping Li
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Programming Languages ◽  
Formal Model ◽  
Operational Semantics ◽  
Type System ◽  
Object Oriented ◽  
Object Oriented Programming ◽  
Constraint System ◽  
Existential Quantification ◽  
Ownership Types

<p>Modern object-oriented programming languages frequently need the ability to clone, duplicate, and copy objects. The usual approaches taken by languages are rudimentary, primarily because these approaches operate with little understanding of the object being cloned. Deep cloning naively copies every object that has a reachable reference path from the object being cloned, even if the objects being copied have no innate relationship with that object. For more sophisticated cloning operations, languages usually only provide the capacity for programmers to define their own cloning operations for specific objects, and with no help from the type system.  Sheep cloning is an automated operation that clones objects by leveraging information about those objects’ structures, which the programmer imparts into their programs with ownership types. Ownership types are a language mechanism that defines an owner for every object in the program. Ownership types create a hierarchical structure for the heap.  In this thesis, we construct an extensible formal model for an object-oriented language with ownership types (Core), and use it to explore different formalisms of sheep cloning. We formalise three distinct operational semantics of sheep cloning, and for each approach we include proofs or proof outlines where appropriate, and provide a comparative analysis of each model’s benefits. Our main contribution is the descripSC formal model of sheep cloning and its proof of type soundness.  The second contribution of this thesis is the formalism of Mojo-jojo, a multiple ownership system that includes existential quantification over types and context parameters, along with a constraint system for context parameters. We prove type soundness for Mojo-jojo. Multiple ownership is a mechanism which allows objects to have more than one owner. Context parameters in Mojo-jojo can use binary operators such as: intersection, union, and disjointness.</p>

scholarly journals Conditional Independence by Typing

2022 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-54
Author(s):  
Maria I. Gorinova ◽  
Andrew D. Gordon ◽  
Charles Sutton ◽  
Matthijs Vákár
Keyword(s):  
Programming Languages ◽  
Conditional Independence ◽  
Probabilistic Models ◽  
Type System ◽  
Type Inference ◽  
Practical Application ◽  
Probabilistic Programming ◽  
Variable Elimination ◽  
Gradient Based ◽  
Inference Methods

A central goal of probabilistic programming languages (PPLs) is to separate modelling from inference. However, this goal is hard to achieve in practice. Users are often forced to re-write their models to improve efficiency of inference or meet restrictions imposed by the PPL. Conditional independence (CI) relationships among parameters are a crucial aspect of probabilistic models that capture a qualitative summary of the specified model and can facilitate more efficient inference. We present an information flow type system for probabilistic programming that captures conditional independence (CI) relationships and show that, for a well-typed program in our system, the distribution it implements is guaranteed to have certain CI-relationships. Further, by using type inference, we can statically deduce which CI-properties are present in a specified model. As a practical application, we consider the problem of how to perform inference on models with mixed discrete and continuous parameters. Inference on such models is challenging in many existing PPLs, but can be improved through a workaround, where the discrete parameters are used implicitly , at the expense of manual model re-writing. We present a source-to-source semantics-preserving transformation, which uses our CI-type system to automate this workaround by eliminating the discrete parameters from a probabilistic program. The resulting program can be seen as a hybrid inference algorithm on the original program, where continuous parameters can be drawn using efficient gradient-based inference methods, while the discrete parameters are inferred using variable elimination. We implement our CI-type system and its example application in SlicStan: a compositional variant of Stan. 1

scholarly journals A framework for improving error messages in dependently-typed languages

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Eremondi ◽  
Wouter Swierstra ◽  
Jurriaan Hage
Keyword(s):  
Programming Languages ◽  
Type System ◽  
Higher Order ◽  
Type Checking ◽  
Unification Algorithm ◽  
Implicit Arguments ◽  
Unification Problem ◽  
Heuristic Analysis ◽  
Type Check ◽  
Typed Languages

AbstractDependently-typed programming languages provide a powerful tool for establishing code correctness. However, it can be hard for newcomers to learn how to employ the advanced type system of such languages effectively. For simply-typed languages, several techniques have been devised to generate helpful error messages and suggestions for the programmer. We adapt these techniques to dependently-typed languages, to facilitate their more widespread adoption. In particular, we modify a higher-order unification algorithm that is used to resolve and type-check implicit arguments. We augment this algorithm with replay graphs, allowing for a global heuristic analysis of a unification problem-set, error-tolerant typing, which allows type-checking to continue after errors are found, and counter-factual unification, which makes error messages less affected by the order in which types are checked. A formalization of our algorithm is presented with an outline of its correctness. We implement replay graphs, and compare the generated error messages to those from existing languages, highlighting the improvements we achieved.

scholarly journals Implementing type theory in higher order constraint logic programming

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 1125-1150
Author(s):  
FERRUCCIO GUIDI ◽  
CLAUDIO SACERDOTI COEN ◽  
ENRICO TASSI
Keyword(s):  
Programming Languages ◽  
Programming Language ◽  
Type System ◽  
Theorem Prover ◽  
Type Checking ◽  
Language Extension ◽  
Order Constraint ◽  
Simple Implementation ◽  
Calculus Of Inductive Constructions ◽  
High Level

In this paper, we are interested in high-level programming languages to implement the core components of an interactive theorem prover for a dependently typed language: the kernel – responsible for type-checking closed terms – and the elaborator – that manipulates open terms, that is terms containing unresolved unification variables.In this paper, we confirm that λProlog, the language developed by Miller and Nadathur since the 80s, is extremely suitable for implementing the kernel. Indeed, we easily obtain a type checker for the Calculus of Inductive Constructions (CIC). Even more, we do so in an incremental way by escalating a checker for a pure type system to the full CIC.We then turn our attention to the elaborator with the objective to obtain a simple implementation thanks to the features of the programming language. In particular, we want to use λProlog’s unification variables to model the object language ones. In this way, scope checking, carrying of assignments and occur checking are handled by the programming language.We observe that the eager generative semantics inherited from Prolog clashes with this plan. We propose an extension to λProlog that allows to control the generative semantics, suspend goals over flexible terms turning them into constraints, and finally manipulate these constraints at the meta-meta level via constraint handling rules.We implement the proposed language extension in the Embedded Lambda Prolog Interpreter system and we discuss how it can be used to extend the kernel into an elaborator for CIC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document