II. Public Land Policies and the Public Domain

1968 ◽  
pp. 35-62
1925 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 420
Author(s):  
Louis Bernard Schmidt ◽  
Benjamin Horace Hibbord

1925 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 238
Author(s):  
Joseph Schafer ◽  
Benjamin Horace Hibbard

Author(s):  
Alexandra Coghlan

The old adage says that “you can only manage what you can measure”. Yet, it is also perhaps true that in the tourism space, where the public and private domains collide, perhaps a little more imagination is required, and sustainable tourism management tools may be required to cover the intangible aspects of tourism as well as the more tangible aspects. This is because the public domain, as highlighted in Chapter 2, holds places and spaces in the public trust – the places and spaces that we share with family and friends, that recharge and rejuvenate, that hold aesthetic, recreational, functional and emotional values for us, as residents of those spaces and places. Meanwhile, the private sector sees those same places and spaces as opportunities to generate a return on investment, often transforming them into economically productive areas through processes of urban regeneration or concessions on public land.


1928 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 214
Author(s):  
Langdon White ◽  
Benjamin H. Hibbard

1925 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 837
Author(s):  
Raynor G. Wellington ◽  
Benjamin Horace Hibbard

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 203-231
Author(s):  
Antonio Terrone
Keyword(s):  

The study of Buddhist texts can inform us of the way scriptures were composed, as well as illuminate the reasons behind their production. This study examines the phenomenon of borrowing and reusing portions of texts without attributing them to their ‘legitimate authors’ within the Buddhist world of contemporary Tibet. It shows that not only is such a practice not at all infrequent and is often socially accepted, but that it is used in this case as a platform to advance specific claims and promote an explicit agenda. Therefore, rather than considering these as instances of plagiarism, this essay looks at the practice of copying and borrowing as an exercise in intertextuality, intended as the faithful retransmission of ancient truths, and as an indication of the public domain of texts in Tibet.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document