CHAPTER I. American Medicine at the Close of the Eighteenth Century

Germinal ◽  
2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Émile Zola
Keyword(s):  

The Grégoires’ property, La Piolaine, was situated two kilometres to the east of Montsou, on the Joiselle road. It was a large square house of no particular style, built at the beginning of the eighteenth century. Of the vast lands which had originally depended...


Author(s):  
Joan Beal

In this chapter, I present two case studies from my teaching of Late Modern English (roughly covering the period 1700–1900) at two UK universities, chosen on the basis of positive feedback from former students. The first demonstrates how the OED online can be used as a resource for the detailed investigation of lexical innovation in a specific period. The second illustrates the use of databases including ECCO and the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography to present a more nuanced view of eighteenth-century English grammars. In both cases, the emphasis is on student-led research and teamwork, and the case studies are illustrated with successful examples of students’ work.


Author(s):  
Brigitte Sassen

In this chapter, I explore the particular social, religious, and gender pressures faced by eighteenth-century women authors by considering these pressures within the context of three stages of the life of Dorothea Schlegel (born Brendel Mendelssohn): first, in her early life and first marriage, secondly, in her emergence as an intellectual and author during the years in Jena with Friedrich Schlegel and the early Romantics, and thirdly, in her post-Jena years when she was active as a translator and story-teller. The chapter looks at the reasons for her dissatisfaction with her first marriage and considers how women intellectuals and writers were viewed in the eighteenth century.


2020 ◽  
pp. 102-131
Author(s):  
Boaz Huss

The chapter examines phenomena that remained outside the scope of what was considered Jewish mysticism: the topics scholars chose to ignore. It discusses how researchers of Jewish mysticism relate to contemporary Hasidic and Kabbalistic movements and examines why the category was not applied to these movements. The chapter examines the claim of Buber, Scholem, and many of their followers that the Hasidism of the eighteenth century was the final stage of Jewish mysticism. It reveals why later forms of Kabbalah and Hasidism were not regarded as authentic expressions of Jewish mysticism, and why they did not, therefore, receive any scholarly attention but were the object of contempt. In this chapter, I show that the disregard of Scholem and his pupils toward the Kabbalistic formations of their times derived from a national-theological position and an Orientalist ambivalence. The researchers of Jewish mysticism—who viewed themselves as the authorized guardians of the Kabbalah—believed that the authentic continuation of the Jewish mystical tradition was rather to be found in academic research, which would reveal the historical significance of Kabbalah and Hasidism, and their mystical and metaphysical origins.


Author(s):  
Richard J. Kahn

This section begins with a very brief overview of early medical philosophies leading up to Barker’s time, when science was developing an important place in American intellectual life. There was a gradual increase in the cultural authority of “regular” medical education by preceptorship, didactic medical school lectures, and medical licensure, as opposed to self-help or domestic medicine, sectarian medicine, the Thomsonians, homeopaths, and others. William Cullen, Benjamin Rush, and John Brown influenced medicine at the end of the eighteenth century. Pierre Louis in Paris, who had become a major influence on American medicine during the first third of the nineteenth century, believed that “medicine is a science of observation” and a “rigid method” is essential for medicine to improve. Careful case reports, necessary for practice and teaching, were facilitated by the numerical method. The Physician’s Case Book, published by Allen & Ticknor, Boston, in 1832, was an attempt to help physicians to record and organize their case reports. Possible reasons Barker failed to publish his manuscript include finances, competition from other books, and the rapidly changing medical beliefs during the first third of the nineteenth century. A comparison is made to Noah Webster’s 1832 decision to abandon the revised edition of his 1799 book on epidemics.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document