The Importance of Efficient Depression Management in Primary Care

2008 ◽  
Vol 148 (7) ◽  
pp. 562
Author(s):  
Christos G. Theleritis ◽  
Thomas J. Paparrigopoulos ◽  
George N. Papadimitriou
2004 ◽  
Vol 82 (4) ◽  
pp. 631-659 ◽  
Author(s):  
AMY M. KILBOURNE ◽  
HERBERT C. SCHULBERG ◽  
EDWARD P. POST ◽  
BRUCE L. ROLLMAN ◽  
BEA HERBECK BELNAP ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 20-22
Author(s):  
Penny Louch

2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramona S DeJesus ◽  
Kurt B Angstman ◽  
Stephen S Cha ◽  
Mark D Williams

Depression poses a significant economic and health burden, yet it remains underdiagnosed and inadequately treated. The STAR*D trial funded by the National Institute of Mental Health showed that more than one antidepressant medication is often necessary to achieve disease remission among patients seen in both psychiatric and primary care settings. The collaborative care model (CCM), using care managers, has been shown to be effective in numerous studies in achieving sustained outcomes in depression management compared to usual care. This model was adopted in a statewide depression treatment improvement initiative among primary care clinics in Minnesota, which was launched in March 2008. In this study, records of patients who were enrolled in CCM from March 2008 until March 2009 were reviewed and compared to those under usual care. Patients who were followed under the CCM had a significantly greater number of antidepressant medication utilizations when compared to those under usual care. After 6 months, mean PHQ-9 score of patients under CCM was statistically lower than those in usual care. There was no significant difference in both mean PHQ-9 scores at 6 months and antidepressant utilization between the 2 groups among patients aged 65 years and older.


2008 ◽  
Vol 148 (7) ◽  
pp. 562
Author(s):  
Lisa V. Rubenstein ◽  
Kimberly A. Hepner

2005 ◽  
Vol 56 (12) ◽  
pp. 1524-1528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin H. Joo ◽  
Francis X. Solano ◽  
Benoit H. Mulsant ◽  
Charles F. Reynolds ◽  
Eric J. Lenze

2009 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 513-519 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Gensichen ◽  
C. Jaeger ◽  
M. Peitz ◽  
M. Torge ◽  
C. Guthlin ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 191 (3) ◽  
pp. 206-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nagina Khan ◽  
Peter Bower ◽  
Anne Rogers

BackgroundThere is a gap between the supply of trained cognitive – behavioural therapists to treat depression and demand for care in the community. There is interest in the potential of self-help interventions, which require less input from a therapist. However, the design of effective self-help interventions is complex. Qualitative research can help to explore some of this complexity Aims The study aimed to identify qualitative studies of patient experience of depression management in primary care, synthesise these studies to develop an explanatory framework, and then apply this framework to the development of a guided self-help intervention for depression.MethodA meta-synthesis was conducted of published qualitative research.ResultsThe synthesis revealed a number of themes, including the nature of personal experience in depression; help-seeking in primary care; control and helplessness in engagement with treatment; stigma associated with treatment; and patients' understandings of self-help interventions.ConclusionsThis meta-synthesis of qualitative studies provided a useful explanatory framework for the development of effective and acceptable guided self-help interventions for depression.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document