scholarly journals Quadratic inequalities for functionals in l^{∞}

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 437
Author(s):  
Gerd Herzog ◽  
Peer Chr. Kunstmann
ECTJ ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 131-140
Author(s):  
Gary J. Anglin ◽  
Thomas M. Schwen ◽  
John B. Anglin

1977 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 379-381
Author(s):  
Phillip M. Eastman ◽  
Merlyn J. Behr

The study reported is directly related to the work of Eastman (1975), which was a continuation of work begun by Carry (1968) and Webb (1971). Eastman obtained a significant interaction when the criterion measure of transfer was regressed on factors of general reasoning and spatial visualization. The Necessary Arithmetic Operations test and the Abstract Reasoning test of the Differential Aptitude Test Battery were used to measure these aptit udes, respectively. Two treatments, one graphical and the other analytical, were used to present methods for finding solution sets of quadratic inequalities. In the graphical treatment, concepts were presented in a symbolic-deductive mode. Eastman observed that factor analytic studies indicated that the measure for spatial visualization used by Carry and Webb (paper folding) had factor loadings on deduction. Conjecturing that the problem of deductive versus inductive presentation of the learning material might have been a confounding variable in the studies by Carry and by Webb, Eastman selected a different measure for spatial visualization, revised the instructional treatments to reflect a figural-inductive mode and a symbolic-deductive mode of presentation, and was successful in isolating an interaction.


1975 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 204-209
Author(s):  
Wayne R. Scott

Frequently I have heard, “That’s not the way we learned to do it. What our teacher did last year was much easier.” And after this easier method has been observed, the solution has either been incomplete or erroneous.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document