scholarly journals DNA metabarcoding of littoral hard-bottom communities: high diversity and database gaps revealed by two molecular markers

PeerJ ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. e4705 ◽  
Author(s):  
Owen S. Wangensteen ◽  
Creu Palacín ◽  
Magdalena Guardiola ◽  
Xavier Turon

Biodiversity assessment of marine hard-bottom communities is hindered by the high diversity and size-ranges of the organisms present. We developed a DNA metabarcoding protocol for biodiversity characterization of structurally complex natural marine hard-bottom communities. We used two molecular markers: the “Leray fragment” of mitochondrialcytochrome c oxidase(COI), for which a novel primer set was developed, and the V7 region of the nuclear small subunit ribosomal RNA (18S). Eight different shallow marine littoral communities from two National Parks in Spain (one in the Atlantic Ocean and another in the Mediterranean Sea) were studied. Samples were sieved into three size fractions from where DNA was extracted separately. Bayesian clustering was used for delimiting molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTUs) and custom reference databases were constructed for taxonomic assignment. Despite applying stringent filters, we found high values for MOTU richness (2,510 and 9,679 MOTUs with 18S and COI, respectively), suggesting that these communities host a large amount of yet undescribed eukaryotic biodiversity. Significant gaps are still found in sequence reference databases, which currently prevent the complete taxonomic assignment of the detected sequences. In our dataset, 85% of 18S MOTUs and 64% of COI MOTUs could be identified to phylum or lower taxonomic level. Nevertheless, those unassigned were mostly rare MOTUs with low numbers of reads, and assigned MOTUs comprised over 90% of the total sequence reads. The identification rate might be significantly improved in the future, as reference databases are further completed. Our results show that marine metabarcoding, currently applied mostly to plankton or sediments, can be adapted to structurally complex hard bottom samples. Thus, eukaryotic metabarcoding emerges as a robust, fast, objective and affordable method to comprehensively characterize the diversity of marine benthic communities dominated by macroscopic seaweeds and colonial or modular sessile metazoans. The 18S marker lacks species-level resolution and thus cannot be recommended to assess the detailed taxonomic composition of these communities. Our new universal primers for COI can potentially be used for biodiversity assessment with high taxonomic resolution in a wide array of marine, terrestrial or freshwater eukaryotic communities.

Author(s):  
Owen S Wangensteen ◽  
Creu Palacín ◽  
Magdalena Guardiola ◽  
Xavier Turon

We developed a metabarcoding method for biodiversity characterization of structurally complex natural marine hard-bottom communities. Novel primer sets for two different molecular markers: the “Leray fragment” of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase, COI, and the V7 region of ribosomal RNA 18S were used to analyse eight different marine shallow benthic communities from two National Parks in Spain (one in the Atlantic Ocean and another in the Mediterranean Sea). Samples were sieved into three size fractions from where DNA was extracted separately. Bayesian clustering was used for delimiting molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTUs) and custom reference databases were constructed for taxonomic assignment. We found unexpectedly high values for MOTU richness, suggesting that these communities host a large amount of yet undescribed eukaryotic biodiversity. Significant gaps are still found in sequence reference databases, which currently prevent the complete taxonomic assignation of the detected sequences. Nevertheless, over 90% (in abundance) of the sequenced reads could be successfully assigned to phylum or lower taxonomical level. This identification rate might be significantly improved in the future, as reference databases are updated. Our results show that marine metabarcoding, currently applied mostly to plankton or sediments, can be adapted to structurally complex hard bottom samples, and emerges as a robust, fast, objective and affordable method for comprehensively characterizing the diversity of marine benthic communities dominated by macroscopic seaweeds and colonial or modular sessile metazoans, allowing for standardized biomonitoring of these ecologically important communities. The new universal primers for COI can potentially be used for biodiversity assessment with high taxonomic resolution in a wide array of marine, terrestrial or freshwater eukaryotic communities.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Owen S Wangensteen ◽  
Creu Palacín ◽  
Magdalena Guardiola ◽  
Xavier Turon

We developed a metabarcoding method for biodiversity characterization of structurally complex natural marine hard-bottom communities. Novel primer sets for two different molecular markers: the “Leray fragment” of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase, COI, and the V7 region of ribosomal RNA 18S were used to analyse eight different marine shallow benthic communities from two National Parks in Spain (one in the Atlantic Ocean and another in the Mediterranean Sea). Samples were sieved into three size fractions from where DNA was extracted separately. Bayesian clustering was used for delimiting molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTUs) and custom reference databases were constructed for taxonomic assignment. We found unexpectedly high values for MOTU richness, suggesting that these communities host a large amount of yet undescribed eukaryotic biodiversity. Significant gaps are still found in sequence reference databases, which currently prevent the complete taxonomic assignation of the detected sequences. Nevertheless, over 90% (in abundance) of the sequenced reads could be successfully assigned to phylum or lower taxonomical level. This identification rate might be significantly improved in the future, as reference databases are updated. Our results show that marine metabarcoding, currently applied mostly to plankton or sediments, can be adapted to structurally complex hard bottom samples, and emerges as a robust, fast, objective and affordable method for comprehensively characterizing the diversity of marine benthic communities dominated by macroscopic seaweeds and colonial or modular sessile metazoans, allowing for standardized biomonitoring of these ecologically important communities. The new universal primers for COI can potentially be used for biodiversity assessment with high taxonomic resolution in a wide array of marine, terrestrial or freshwater eukaryotic communities.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan-Niklas Macher ◽  
Till-Hendrik Macher ◽  
Florian Leese

Metabarcoding and metagenomic approaches are becoming routine techniques in biodiversity assessment and ecological studies. The assignment of taxonomic information to sequences is challenging, as many reference libraries are lacking information on certain taxonomic groups and can contain erroneous sequences. Combining different reference databases is therefore a promising approach for maximizing taxonomic coverage and reliability of results. This tutorial shows how to use the “BOLD_NCBI_Merger” script to combine sequence data obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) GenBank and the Barcode of Life Database (BOLD) and prepare it for taxonomic assignment with the software MEGAN.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arne Beermann ◽  
Dominik Buchner ◽  
Florian Leese ◽  
Till-Hendrik Macher ◽  
Miroslav Ocadlik ◽  
...  

The Joint Danube Survey (JDS) is a multinational effort in monitoring Danube’s water quality, including its major tributaries. The Danube river stretches over a distance of 2,800 km and flows through or borders 10 different countries to which it is of utter importance as a source of potable water and hydrodynamic power. The JDS is conducted every 6 years and provides a unique opportunity to collect comprehensive data on both abiotic parameters and organisms and to raise awareness of the importance of water as a natural resource. As part of JDS and as a biological quality element in many monitoring programs worldwide, macroinvertebrates are monitored as indicators for various environmental conditions. However, due to their diverse taxonomic composition, associated difficulties with their morphology-based identification as well as their sheer abundance, macroinvertebrates are often analysed with a low taxonomic resolution (i.e., above species level). As an alternative, DNA metabarcoding offers a promising approach to capture this species diversity more accurately. Here, we used DNA metabarcoding to investigate the macrozoobenthic diversity of 46 sites from the latest JDS sampling campaign in 2019. To analyse macroinvertebrate diversity, bulk samples were taken by kick-net sampling and analysed using two different approaches, analysing the bulk sample fixative and analysing homogenised organisms from complete bulk samples. DNA metabarcoding of the sample fixative revealed 1,146 Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) and 231 species compared to 833 OTUs and 333 species from homogenised sample analysis. While more dipterans, in particular Chironomidae, were detected in fixative (136 species) than homogenised bulk (90 species) analyses, the latter picked up more Trichoptera (19 vs. 2), Amphipoda (10 vs. 4) and Bivalvia species (13 vs. 5). Even though these results of a DNA-based assessment deliver new insights into species richness and composition of Danube’s macroinvertebrate communities from the Danube source to its delta already, it is evident that the majority of OTUs was not assigned to species. While filling this lack of reference sequences poses a major challenge, the JDS consortium also offers a unique opportunity to complement reference databases in a multinational effort towards a more comprehensive Danube assessment and monitoring.


PeerJ ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. e1966 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasco Elbrecht ◽  
Pierre Taberlet ◽  
Tony Dejean ◽  
Alice Valentini ◽  
Philippe Usseglio-Polatera ◽  
...  

Cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) is a powerful marker for DNA barcoding of animals, with good taxonomic resolution and a large reference database. However, when used for DNA metabarcoding, estimation of taxa abundances and species detection are limited due to primer bias caused by highly variable primer binding sites across the COI gene. Therefore, we explored the ability of the 16S ribosomal DNA gene as an alternative metabarcoding marker for species level assessments. Ten bulk samples, each containing equal amounts of tissue from 52 freshwater invertebrate taxa, were sequenced with the Illumina NextSeq 500 system. The 16S primers amplified three more insect species than the Folmer COI primers and amplified more equally, probably due to decreased primer bias. Estimation of biomass might be less biased with 16S than with COI, although variation in read abundances of two orders of magnitudes is still observed. According to these results, the marker choice depends on the scientific question. If the goal is to obtain a taxonomic identification at the species level, then COI is more appropriate due to established reference databases and known taxonomic resolution of this marker, knowing that a greater proportion of insects will be missed using COI Folmer primers. If the goal is to obtain a more comprehensive survey the 16S marker, which requires building a local reference database, or optimised degenerated COI primers could be more appropriate.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasco Elbrecht ◽  
Pierre Taberlet ◽  
Tony Dejean ◽  
Alice Valentini ◽  
Philippe Usseglio-polatera ◽  
...  

Cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) is a powerful marker for DNA barcoding of animals, with good taxonomic resolution and a large reference database. However, when used for DNA metabarcoding, estimation of taxa abundances and species detection are limited due to primer bias caused by highly variable primer binding sites across the COI gene. Therefore, we explored the ability of the 16S ribosomal DNA gene as an alternative metabarcoding marker for species level assessments. Ten bulk samples, each containing equal amounts of tissue from 52 freshwater invertebrate taxa, were sequenced with the Illumina NextSeq 500 system. In comparison to COI, the 16S marker amplified more insect species and amplified more equally, probably due to decreased primer bias. Rough estimation of biomass might thus be less biased with 16S than with COI. According to these results, the marker choice depends on the scientific question. If the goal is to obtain a taxonomic identification at the species level, then COI is more appropriate due to established reference databases and known taxonomic resolution of this marker, knowing that a greater proportion of species will be missed using COI Folmer primers. If the goal is to obtain a more comprehensive survey in a context where it is possible to build a local reference database, the 16S marker could be more appropriate.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan-Niklas Macher ◽  
Till-Hendrik Macher ◽  
Florian Leese

Metabarcoding and metagenomic approaches are becoming routine techniques in biodiversity assessment and ecological studies. The assignment of taxonomic information to sequences is challenging, as many reference libraries are lacking information on certain taxonomic groups and can contain erroneous sequences. Combining different reference databases is therefore a promising approach for maximizing taxonomic coverage and reliability of results. This tutorial shows how to use the “BOLD_NCBI_Merger” script to combine sequence data obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) GenBank and the Barcode of Life Database (BOLD) and prepare it for taxonomic assignment with the software MEGAN.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasco Elbrecht ◽  
Pierre Taberlet ◽  
Tony Dejean ◽  
Alice Valentini ◽  
Philippe Usseglio-polatera ◽  
...  

Cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) is a powerful marker for DNA barcoding of animals, with good taxonomic resolution and a large reference database. However, when used for DNA metabarcoding, estimation of taxa abundances and species detection are limited due to primer bias caused by highly variable primer binding sites across the COI gene. Therefore, we explored the ability of the 16S ribosomal DNA gene as an alternative metabarcoding marker for species level assessments. Ten bulk samples, each containing equal amounts of tissue from 52 freshwater invertebrate taxa, were sequenced with the Illumina NextSeq 500 system. In comparison to COI, the 16S marker amplified more insect species and amplified more equally, probably due to decreased primer bias. Rough estimation of biomass might thus be less biased with 16S than with COI. According to these results, the marker choice depends on the scientific question. If the goal is to obtain a taxonomic identification at the species level, then COI is more appropriate due to established reference databases and known taxonomic resolution of this marker, knowing that a greater proportion of species will be missed using COI Folmer primers. If the goal is to obtain a more comprehensive survey in a context where it is possible to build a local reference database, the 16S marker could be more appropriate.


2021 ◽  
Vol 172 ◽  
pp. 103514
Author(s):  
Brian K. Walker ◽  
Charles Messing ◽  
Jana Ash ◽  
Sandra Brooke ◽  
John K. Reed ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document