scholarly journals Childhood socioeconomic deprivation, but not current mood, is associated with behavioural disinhibition in adults

PeerJ ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. e964 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tünde Paál ◽  
Thomas Carpenter ◽  
Daniel Nettle
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Deprivation ◽  
Behavioural Disinhibition ◽  
Current Mood

scholarly journals Childhood socioeconomic deprivation, but not current mood, is associated with behavioural disinhibition in adults

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tunde Paal ◽  
Thomas Carpenter ◽  
Daniel Nettle
Keyword(s):  
Mood Induction ◽  
Community Sample ◽  
Negative Mood ◽  
Reaction Times ◽  
Stop Signal ◽  
Socioeconomic Deprivation ◽  
Stop Signal Task ◽  
Socioeconomic Background ◽  
Behavioural Disinhibition ◽  
Current Mood

There is evidence to suggest that impulsivity is predicted by socioeconomic background, with people from more deprived backgrounds tending to be more impulsive, and by current mood, with poorer mood associated with greater impulsivity. However, impulsivity is not a unitary construct, and previous research in this area has focused on measures of ‘waiting’ impulsivity rather than behavioural disinhibition. We administered a standard measure of behavioural disinhibition, the stop-signal task, to 58 adult participants from a community sample. We had measured socioeconomic background using participant postcode at age 16, and assigned participants to receive either a neutral or a negative mood induction. We found no effects of mood on behavioural disinhibition, but we found a significant effect of socioeconomic background. Participants with more deprived postcodes at age 16 showed longer stop-signal reaction times, and hence greater behavioural disinhibition. The pattern was independent of participant age and overall reaction time. Greater behavioural disinhibition may be a consequence of experiencing childhood socioeconomic deprivation, and could play a role in maintaining social gradients in outcomes such as addiction.

scholarly journals Childhood socioeconomic deprivation, but not current mood, is associated with behavioural disinhibition in adults

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tunde Paal ◽  
Thomas Carpenter ◽  
Daniel Nettle
Keyword(s):  
Mood Induction ◽  
Community Sample ◽  
Negative Mood ◽  
Reaction Times ◽  
Stop Signal ◽  
Socioeconomic Deprivation ◽  
Stop Signal Task ◽  
Socioeconomic Background ◽  
Behavioural Disinhibition ◽  
Current Mood

There is evidence to suggest that impulsivity is predicted by socioeconomic background, with people from more deprived backgrounds tending to be more impulsive, and by current mood, with poorer mood associated with greater impulsivity. However, impulsivity is not a unitary construct, and previous research in this area has focused on measures of ‘waiting’ impulsivity rather than behavioural disinhibition. We administered a standard measure of behavioural disinhibition, the stop-signal task, to 58 adult participants from a community sample. We had measured socioeconomic background using participant postcode at age 16, and assigned participants to receive either a neutral or a negative mood induction. We found no effects of mood on behavioural disinhibition, but we found a significant effect of socioeconomic background. Participants with more deprived postcodes at age 16 showed longer stop-signal reaction times, and hence greater behavioural disinhibition. The pattern was independent of participant age and overall reaction time. Greater behavioural disinhibition may be a consequence of experiencing childhood socioeconomic deprivation, and could play a role in maintaining social gradients in outcomes such as addiction.

Feel Thine Own Self – Mood Congruency Evaluation of Emotional State Adjectives

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Szczepan J. Grzybowski ◽  
Miroslaw Wyczesany ◽  
Jan Kaiser
Keyword(s):  
Mood Induction ◽  
Semantic Analysis ◽  
Emotional State ◽  
Time Window ◽  
Event Related Potential ◽  
Negativity Bias ◽  
Positive Potential ◽  
Semantic Access ◽  
Current Mood ◽  
Component Time

Abstract. The goal of the study was to explore event-related potential (ERP) differences during the processing of emotional adjectives that were evaluated as congruent or incongruent with the current mood. We hypothesized that the first effects of congruence evaluation would be evidenced during the earliest stages of semantic analysis. Sixty mood adjectives were presented separately for 1,000 ms each during two sessions of mood induction. After each presentation, participants evaluated to what extent the word described their mood. The results pointed to incongruence marking of adjective’s meaning with current mood during early attention orientation and semantic access stages (the P150 component time window). This was followed by enhanced processing of congruent words at later stages. As a secondary goal the study also explored word valence effects and their relation to congruence evaluation. In this regard, no significant effects were observed on the ERPs; however, a negativity bias (enhanced responses to negative adjectives) was noted on the behavioral data (RTs), which could correspond to the small differences traced on the late positive potential.

scholarly journals Who Reports Insomnia? Relationships with Age, Sex, Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Deprivation

SLEEP ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 1163-1169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah-Jane Paine ◽  
Philippa H. Gander ◽  
Ricci Harris ◽  
Papaarangi Reid
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Deprivation

scholarly journals The varying influence of socioeconomic deprivation on breast cancer screening uptake in London

2015 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 330-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth H. Jack ◽  
Tony Robson ◽  
Elizabeth A. Davies
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Breast Cancer Screening ◽  
Socioeconomic Deprivation ◽  
Screening Uptake

scholarly journals Socioeconomic disparities in head and neck cancer survival in Germany: a causal mediation analysis using population-based cancer registry data

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Bedir ◽  
Semaw Ferede Abera ◽  
Ljupcho Efremov ◽  
Lamiaa Hassan ◽  
Dirk Vordermark ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Mediation Analysis ◽  
Cancer Survival ◽  
Socioeconomic Inequality ◽  
Relative Survival ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Socioeconomic Deprivation ◽  
Stage At Diagnosis ◽  
Causal Mediation Analysis

Abstract Purpose Despite recent improvements in cancer treatment in Germany, a marked difference in cancer survival based on socioeconomic factors persists. We aim to quantify the effect of socioeconomic inequality on head and neck cancer (HNC) survival. Methods Information on 20,821 HNC patients diagnosed in 2009–2013 was routinely collected by German population-based cancer registries. Socioeconomic inequality was defined by the German Index of Socioeconomic Deprivation. The Cox proportional regression and relative survival analysis measured the survival disparity according to level of socioeconomic deprivation with respective confidence intervals (CI). A causal mediation analysis was conducted to quantify the effect of socioeconomic deprivation mediated through medical care, stage at diagnosis, and treatment on HNC survival. Results The most socioeconomically deprived patients were found to have the highest hazard of dying when compared to the most affluent (Hazard Ratio: 1.25, 95% CI 1.17–1.34). The most deprived patients also had the worst 5-year age-adjusted relative survival (50.8%, 95% CI 48.5–53.0). Our mediation analysis showed that most of the effect of deprivation on survival was mediated through differential stage at diagnosis during the first 6 months after HNC diagnosis. As follow-up time increased, medical care, stage at diagnosis, and treatment played no role in mediating the effect of deprivation on survival. Conclusion This study confirms the survival disparity between affluent and deprived HNC patients in Germany. Considering data limitations, our results suggest that, within six months after HNC diagnosis, the elimination of differences in stage at diagnosis could reduce survival inequalities.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document