scholarly journals Socioeconomic disparities in head and neck cancer survival in Germany: a causal mediation analysis using population-based cancer registry data

Author(s):  
Ahmed Bedir ◽  
Semaw Ferede Abera ◽  
Ljupcho Efremov ◽  
Lamiaa Hassan ◽  
Dirk Vordermark ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Despite recent improvements in cancer treatment in Germany, a marked difference in cancer survival based on socioeconomic factors persists. We aim to quantify the effect of socioeconomic inequality on head and neck cancer (HNC) survival. Methods Information on 20,821 HNC patients diagnosed in 2009–2013 was routinely collected by German population-based cancer registries. Socioeconomic inequality was defined by the German Index of Socioeconomic Deprivation. The Cox proportional regression and relative survival analysis measured the survival disparity according to level of socioeconomic deprivation with respective confidence intervals (CI). A causal mediation analysis was conducted to quantify the effect of socioeconomic deprivation mediated through medical care, stage at diagnosis, and treatment on HNC survival. Results The most socioeconomically deprived patients were found to have the highest hazard of dying when compared to the most affluent (Hazard Ratio: 1.25, 95% CI 1.17–1.34). The most deprived patients also had the worst 5-year age-adjusted relative survival (50.8%, 95% CI 48.5–53.0). Our mediation analysis showed that most of the effect of deprivation on survival was mediated through differential stage at diagnosis during the first 6 months after HNC diagnosis. As follow-up time increased, medical care, stage at diagnosis, and treatment played no role in mediating the effect of deprivation on survival. Conclusion This study confirms the survival disparity between affluent and deprived HNC patients in Germany. Considering data limitations, our results suggest that, within six months after HNC diagnosis, the elimination of differences in stage at diagnosis could reduce survival inequalities.

2019 ◽  
Vol 132 ◽  
pp. 23-24
Author(s):  
M.H. Olsen ◽  
P. Lassen ◽  
C. Rotbøl ◽  
T.K. Kjær ◽  
E.A.W. Andersen ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 357
Author(s):  
Lina Jansen ◽  
Josephine Kanbach ◽  
Isabelle Finke ◽  
Volker Arndt ◽  
Katharina Emrich ◽  
...  

Many countries have reported survival inequalities due to regional socioeconomic deprivation. To quantify the potential gain from eliminating cancer survival disadvantages associated with area-based deprivation in Germany, we calculated the number of avoidable excess deaths. We used population-based cancer registry data from 11 of 16 German federal states. Patients aged ≥15 years diagnosed with an invasive malignant tumor between 2008 and 2017 were included. Area-based socioeconomic deprivation was assessed using the quintiles of the German Index of Multiple Deprivation (GIMD) 2010 on a municipality level nationwide. Five-year age-standardized relative survival for 25 most common cancer sites and for total cancer were calculated using period analysis. Incidence and number of avoidable excess deaths in Germany in 2013–2016 were estimated. Summed over the 25 cancer sites, 4100 annual excess deaths (3.0% of all excess deaths) could have been avoided each year in Germany during the period 2013–2016 if relative survival were in all regions comparable with the least deprived regions. Colorectal, oral and pharynx, prostate, and bladder cancer contributed the largest numbers of avoidable excess deaths. Our results provide a good basis to estimate the potential of intervention programs for reducing socioeconomic inequalities in cancer burden in Germany.


Author(s):  
Rosanne C. Schoonbeek ◽  
Dominique V.C. de Jel ◽  
Boukje A.C. van Dijk ◽  
Stefan M. Willems ◽  
Elisabeth Bloemena ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 2500-2507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Cash ◽  
C. Riley Duck ◽  
Courtney Brinkman ◽  
Whitney Rebholz ◽  
Christy Albert ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. e0229266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Evers ◽  
Christian Ostheimer ◽  
Frank Sieker ◽  
Dirk Vordermark ◽  
Daniel Medenwald

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document