Design, Development and Evaluation of Targeted Discrete-Flame Weeding for Inter-row Weed Control Using Machine Vision

Author(s):  
Reihaneh Loni ◽  
Mohammad Loghavi ◽  
Abbas Jafari
2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 164-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ömer Barış ÖZLÜOYMAK ◽  
Ali BOLAT ◽  
Ali BAYAT ◽  
Emin GÜZEL

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vivek K K ◽  
Sidharth R ◽  
Rohit P ◽  
Vishagan S ◽  
Peeyush K P

Author(s):  
Luisa Martelloni ◽  
Marco Fontanelli ◽  
Lisa Caturegli ◽  
Monica Gaetani ◽  
Nicola Grossi ◽  
...  

Weed control is crucial to ensure that turfgrass is established effectively. Although herbicides are commonly used to control weeds in turfgrasses, environmental and public health concerns have led to limiting or banning the use of synthetic herbicides in urban areas. The species seashore paspalum (Paspalum vaginatumSw.) is susceptible to such herbicides. Flame weeding could be an alternative to the use of synthetic herbicides for selective weed control in seashore paspalum. In this study, five different liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) doses of flaming (0, 61, 91, 157 and 237 kg ha-1) were tested in order to find the optimal dose, in terms of weed control and costs. The aim was to maintain a seashore paspalum (cultivar ‘Salam’) turf free of weeds during spring green-up, and at the same time avoid damaging the turfgrass. Using a self-propelled machine designed and built at the University of Pisa, flaming was applied three times when weeds started growing and the turfgrass started green-up. Our results highlight that an LPG dose of 157 kg ha-1was the most economic dose that led to a significant reduction in initial weed cover and density, enabling the turfgrass to recover three weeks after the third application.


2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 378-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C. Slaughter ◽  
D. Ken Giles ◽  
Steven A. Fennimore ◽  
Richard F. Smith
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Peruzzi ◽  
Luisa Martelloni ◽  
Christian Frasconi ◽  
Marco Fontanelli ◽  
Michel Pirchio ◽  
...  

Intra-row weed control in organic or low-input cropping systems is more difficult than in conventional agriculture. The various mechanical and thermal devices available for intra-row weed control are reported in this review. Low-tech mechanical devices such as cultivators, finger-weeders, brush weeders, and torsionweeders tend to be used in low density crops, while spring-tine harrows are mainly applied in narrow-row high-density crops. Flame weeding can be used for both narrow and wide-row sown crops, provided that the crop is heat-tolerant. Robotic weeders are the most recent addition to agricultural engineering, and only a few are available on the market. Nowadays, robotic weeders are not yet used in small and medium sized farms. In Europe, highincome niche crops are often cultivated in small farms and farmers cannot invest in high-tech solutions. Irrespectively of the choice of low- or high-tech machines, there are several weeders that can be used to reduce the use of herbicides, making of them a judicious use, or decide to avoid them.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document