Improving safety by developing trust with a just culture

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah Small ◽  
Robert M Small ◽  
Alice Green
Keyword(s):  
Just Culture

A Just Culture

2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 210-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Vogelsmeier ◽  
Jill Scott-Cawiezell
Keyword(s):  
Just Culture

scholarly journals A Just Culture Approach to Managing Medication Errors

2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 308-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin Rogers ◽  
Emily Griffin ◽  
William Carnie ◽  
Joseph Melucci ◽  
Robert J. Weber
Keyword(s):  
Medication Errors ◽  
Just Culture

scholarly journals Just culture: “Evidence”, power and algorithms

2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sidney W. A. Dekker ◽  
James M. Nyce
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Organizational Justice ◽  
Medical Errors ◽  
Just Culture ◽  
Iatrogenic Harm ◽  
The Creation ◽  
Power Play

Background: The notion of “just culture” has become a way for hospital administrations to determine employee accountability for medical errors and adverse events. Method: In this paper, we question whether organizational justice can be achieved through algorithmic determination of the intention, volition and repetition of employee actions. Results and conclusion: The analysis in our paper suggests that the construction of evidence and use of power play important roles in the creation of “justice” after iatrogenic harm. 

Just culture

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-29
Author(s):  
Jip Kreijns
Keyword(s):  
Just Culture

scholarly journals Just culture

2019 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Linda Paradiso ◽  
Nancy Sweeney
Keyword(s):  
Just Culture

“Just culture”: A better way to learn from mistakes

2010 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 48-49
Author(s):  
Jennifer M. Groszek
Keyword(s):  
Just Culture

“Just Culture”: Is Radiology Ready?

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hani H. Abujudeh
Keyword(s):  
Just Culture

scholarly journals Transnational Feminisms, Nonideal Theory, and “Other” Women’s Power

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Serene J Khader
Keyword(s):  
Amartya Sen ◽  
Gender Justice ◽  
Nonideal Theory ◽  
Epistemic Practices ◽  
Just Culture ◽  
Multiple Strategies ◽  
Women's Power ◽  
Women's Oppression ◽  
The Right ◽  
Key Questions

Postcolonial and transnational feminists’ calls to recognize “other” women’s agency have seemed to some Western feminists to entail moral quietism about women’s oppression. Here, I offer an antirelativist framing of the transnational feminist critiques, one rooted in a conception of transnational feminisms as a nonideal theoretical enterprise. The Western feminist problem is not simple ethnocentrism, but rather a failure to ask the right types of normative questions, questions relevant to the nonideal context in which transnational feminist praxis occurs. Instead of asking which forms of power are gender-justice-enhancing, Western feminists are fixated on contrasting “other” cultures to an idealized Western culture. A focus on ideal theorizing works together with colonial epistemic practices to divert Western feminist attention from key questions about what will reduce “other” women’s oppression under conditions of gender injustice and ongoing imperialism. Western feminists need to ask whether “other” women’s power is resistant, and answering this question requires a focus on what Amartya Sen would call “justice enhancement” rather than an ideal of the gender-just culture. I show how a focus on resistance, accompanied by a colonialism-visibilizing hypothesis and a normative vision that allows multiple strategies for transitioning out of injustice, can guide Western feminists toward more appropriate questions about “other” women’s power.

scholarly journals Instrument for Measuring Patient Safety Culture: Literature Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 158-176
Author(s):  
Yumna Nur Millati Hanifa ◽  
Inge Dhamanti
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Safety Culture ◽  
Quality Care ◽  
Patient Safety Culture ◽  
Health Facilities ◽  
Healthcare Organizations ◽  
Just Culture ◽  
Safety Attitudes ◽  
Four Dimensions

The implementation of safe and quality care with attention to patient safety, requires organization’s effort to create and cultivating patient safety culture. The purpose of this article was to map the instruments used in measuring patient safety culture in healthcare organizations. The method used integrated literature review from various sources of research articles published from 2015 to 2020. The article included if it was available in full text and open access as well as articles described the instruments of patient safety culture or measurement of patient safety culture using one of the instruments of measurement of patient safety culture. The results of the literature review unravel the findings of three instruments such as HSOPSC (Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture), MaPSaF (Manchester Patient Safety Assessment Framework) and SAQ (Safety Attitudes Questionnaire). We concluded all three instruments contained four dimensions of patient safety culture, namely open culture, just culture, reporting culture and learning culture and were widely used to measure patient safety culture in hospitals, primary health facilities and other health facilities.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document