scholarly journals Patient Satisfaction With the Head and Neck Cancer Telephone Triage Service During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Cureus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yinan Zhu ◽  
Zehong Chen ◽  
Anni Ding ◽  
Hannah Walter ◽  
Rachel Easto ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yinan Zhu ◽  
Anni Ding ◽  
Hannah Walter ◽  
Rachel Easto ◽  
Adam Wilde

Abstract Aims A head and neck cancer telephone triage pathway was implemented in March 2020 using the Head and Neck Cancer Risk Calculator as part of the 2 week wait cancer referral pathway. This was in response to the COVID-19 pandemic to stream cancer referrals to minimize unnecessary interactions and appointments with health services. The aim of this study is to assess patient satisfaction with the telephone triage system via a customised patient satisfaction questionnaire in the setting of a district general hospital. Methods A custom designed patient satisfaction questionnaire covering different facets of the patient experience will be used to measure patient satisfaction. These 16 questions (including open ended questions) are adapted from internally validated questionnaires. All continuous new head and neck cancer referrals to Torbay Hospital over two 6 week periods will be analysed, the first at the inception of the telephone triage service and the second several months later. The focus is on patient satisfaction towards the method of delivery of the telephone triage service rather than the content of delivery. Results and Conclusions Data collection is ongoing at the moment and preliminary results suggest that patient satisfaction is mixed, with a proportion of patients being unsatisfied that they did not get an examination, and a larger proportion of patients satisfied with the easier accessibility and safety of the service in the midst of the pandemic.


2017 ◽  
Vol 131 (5) ◽  
pp. 442-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Brammer ◽  
D Dawson ◽  
M Joseph ◽  
J Tipper ◽  
T Jemmet ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectives:This study aimed to assess head and neck cancer patient satisfaction with the use of a touch-screen computer patient-completed questionnaire for assessing Adult Co-morbidity Evaluation 27 co-morbidity scores prior to treatment, along with its clinical reliability.Methods:A total of 96 head and neck cancer patients were included in the audit. An accurate Adult Co-morbidity Evaluation 27 co-morbidity score was achieved via patient-completed questionnaire assessment for 97 per cent of participants.Results:In all, 96 per cent of patients found the use of a touch-screen computer acceptable and would be willing to use one again, and 62 per cent would be willing to do so without help. Patients were more likely to be willing to use the computer again without help if they were aged 65 years or younger (χ2test;p= 0.0054) or had a performance status of 0 or 1 (χ2test;p= 0.00034).Conclusion:Use of a touch-screen computer is an acceptable approach for assessing Adult Co-morbidity Evaluation 27 scores at pre-treatment assessment in a multidisciplinary joint surgical–oncology clinic.


2020 ◽  
Vol Volume 14 ◽  
pp. 859-868
Author(s):  
Yoann Pointreau ◽  
Rene-Jean Bensadoun ◽  
Guillaume Bera ◽  
Christian Sire ◽  
Amandine Ruffier ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Turner ◽  
J Daniels ◽  
A Belloso

Abstract Introduction NHS England sets standards to ensure prompt specialist review, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer. Patients with suspected cancer should receive specialist review within 14 days of referral, diagnosis by day 28 and first treatment by day 62. To reduce transmission during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the NHS recommended telephone triage as the first specialist appointment. The effect of telephone triage on head and neck cancer timeframes in an NHS teaching hospital was assessed. Method Four head and neck cancer telephone triage clinics during July 2020 were selected at random. Clinical correspondence and the electronic patient records were reviewed for each patient and cancer pathway timeframes were analysed. Results 31 patients were referred for telephone triage and 100% received specialist review within 14 days. Subsequently 17 (55%) patients were investigated, 12 (71%) of which received a diagnosis within 28 days. 4 patients received a cancer diagnosis, but none received first treatment within 62 days. 24 (77%) patients were seen in a face-to-face clinic after telephone triage on average 7 days after telephone triage. Conclusions In this sample, telephone triage allowed safe initial specialist review by meeting the 14-day standard. However, the 28-day diagnosis and 62-day treatment standards were not adhered to. Telephone triage does not largely reduce overall patient contact, with 77% of patients subsequently reviewed in a patient-facing setting. The addition of telephone triage delayed first clinical examination by a specialist by an average of 7 days, which may be a contributing factor to the delays seen in diagnosis and treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document