scholarly journals Match for Orthopedic Fellowship Programs in the United States: Online Accessibility, Content, and Accreditation Comparison Between Subspecialties and Review of Alternative Resources

Cureus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohit J Jain ◽  
Karthikeyan Chinnakkannu ◽  
Dhavalkumar J Patel ◽  
Sivashanmugam Raju
2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 767-770
Author(s):  
Robert B. Stevens ◽  
John R. Hatzenbuehler ◽  
William W. Dexter ◽  
Amy E. Haskins ◽  
Christina T. Holt

ABSTRACT Background  In 2008, it was shown that 11% of applications to a primary care sports medicine program contained unverifiable citations for publications. In 2009, the American Medical Society for Sports Medicine changed the application requirements, requiring proof that all claimed citations (publications and presentations) be included with the fellowship application. Objective  We determined the rate of unverifiable academic citations in applications to primary care sports medicine fellowship programs after proof of citations was required. Methods  We retrospectively examined all applications submitted to 5 primary care sports medicine fellowship programs across the country for 3 academic years (2010–2013), out of 108 to 131 programs per year. For claimed citations that did not include proof of publication or presentation, we attempted to verify them using PubMed and Google Scholar searches, a medical librarian search, and finally directly contacting the publisher or sponsoring conference organization for verification. Results  Fifteen of 311 applications contained at least 1 unverifiable citation. The total unverifiable rate was 4.8% (15 of 311) for publications and 11% (9 of 85) for presentations. These rates were lower than previously published within the same medical subspecialty. Conclusions  After requiring proof of publication and presentation citations within applications to primary care sports medicine fellowship programs, unverifiable citations persisted but were less than previously reported.


2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. e2014.00402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soorena Fatehchehr ◽  
Ghazaleh Rostaminia ◽  
Michael O. Gardner ◽  
Elisa Ramunno ◽  
Nora M. Doyle

2008 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 664-667 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Ramirez-Schrempp ◽  
David H. Dorfman ◽  
Irene Tien ◽  
Andrew S. Liteplo

2009 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 339-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex J. Auseon ◽  
Stephen F. Schaal ◽  
Albert J. Kolibash ◽  
Rollin Nagel ◽  
Catherine R. Lucey ◽  
...  

Neurology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 94 (11) ◽  
pp. 495-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Z. Obeidat ◽  
Yasir N. Jassam ◽  
Le H. Hua ◽  
Gary Cutter ◽  
Corey C. Ford ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo investigate the current status of postgraduate training in neuroimmunology and multiple sclerosis (NI/MS) in the United States.MethodsWe developed a questionnaire to collect information on fellowship training focus, duration of training, number of fellows, funding application process, rotations, visa sponsorship, and an open-ended question about challenges facing training in NI/MS. We identified target programs and sent the questionnaires electronically to fellowship program directors.ResultsWe identified and sent the questionnaire to 69 NI/MS fellowship programs. We successfully obtained data from 64 programs. Most programs were small, matriculating 1–2 fellows per year, and incorporated both NI and MS training into the curriculum. Most programs were flexible in their duration, typically lasting 1–2 years, and offered opportunities for research during training. Only 56% reported the ability to sponsor nonimmigrant visas. Most institutions reported having some internal funding, although the availability of these funds varied from year to year. Several program directors identified funding availability and the current absence of national subspecialty certification as major challenges facing NI/MS training.ConclusionOur study is the first to describe the current status of NI/MS training in the United States. We found many similarities across programs. We anticipate that these data will serve as a first step towards developing a standard NI/MS curriculum and help identify areas where shared resources could enhance trainee education despite differences in training environments. We identified funding availability, certification status, and nonimmigrant visa sponsorship as potential barriers to future growth in the field.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document